Sheriff Joe
DA
Are you stupid?
The media didn't support/root for and try to elect Clinton?
You are truly a dumbass.
Have you heard the one about CNN giving the debate questions to Clinton regime?
The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
The media didn't support/root for and try to elect Clinton?
You are truly a dumbass.
Have you heard the one about CNN giving the debate questions to Clinton regime?
Hüsker Dü
DA
Kinda falls in line with what the misogynist in chief said . . .Rush Limbaugh Has Some Fun With Feminists Going On 'Sex Strike' For Roe V. Wade
"Will anybody notice if these babes stop having sex?"
There are certain topics President Donald Trump, 72, should stay away from an one of those is the #MeToo movement. Over 21 women have come forward to accuse him of sexual misconduct, so it’s not a subject he should be cracking jokes about. But because the bully-in-chief doesn’t know when to quit, he openly mocked the era of #MeToo during a speech in Montana on July 5.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Lighten up Francis, you really need to work on that sense of humor.
You haven't made any jokes since you nominated HRC.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You certainly are deep in that shit, hip waders? Why do you insist on constantly minimalizing yourself ?
Hüsker Dü
DA
It's funny enough watching you nutters writhe in Trump's shit.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Why did brazile get fired?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Laughing through your tears.
Hey!!! Racist Joe!!!! I found a job for you. Like a real job - Trump's looking for cooks and waiters at Margo-Largo!
I'm sure you can overcook at chunk of beef - and even though Trump wants ferners, with all the spanglish cus words you picked up at the Standard Brand parking lot (and the donkey shows you hit-up in TJ) I'm sure you can pass.
Don't thank me. Remember. If it's not good enough for a shoe, it's not good enough for Potus!
I'm sure you can overcook at chunk of beef - and even though Trump wants ferners, with all the spanglish cus words you picked up at the Standard Brand parking lot (and the donkey shows you hit-up in TJ) I'm sure you can pass.
Don't thank me. Remember. If it's not good enough for a shoe, it's not good enough for Potus!
Sheriff Joe
DA
Maybe you can answer why brazile got fired?
Sheriff Joe
DA
I hope she runs, Trump will have a field day with Pocahontas II.
Media
LYING AGAIN! Kamala Harris catches HELL for pushing AP story about immigrant recruits being discharged
Media
LYING AGAIN! Kamala Harris catches HELL for pushing AP story about immigrant recruits being discharged
Sheriff Joe
DA
Telemundo: Trump Against Minorities
"A step backwards"
TIMOTHY A. CLARY / Staff / Getty Images
ByPaul Bois
@PaulBois39
July 6, 2018
3.4k views
Because President Trump plans to revoke the Obama administration's guidelines on affirmative action, he is "against minorities," according to Spanish-speaking Telemundo.
Under the headline "Trump Against Minorities," Telemundo reports that Trump has it out for minorities, when, in fact, his new policy was applauded by Asian-Americans, who have been unfairly discriminated against due to affirmative action.
"This is a triumphant moment for Asian American communities," the Asian American Coalition for Education said in a statement following the Trump administration’s action.
Here's how Telemundo reported it:
President Trump’s administration has put an end to the practice of universities that favor the admission of racial and gender minorities to promote diversity. The suspension breaks with the guidelines that began to be applied in 2011 under the administration of Barrack Obama, in a policy called Affirmative Action. Under the new system, schools will stop considering race as a criteria of admission. Civil rights groups raised their voice against the new measure, that they consider a step backwards.
How exactly is is a "step backwards" for schools to treat everyone as equal, Telemundo did not say
"A step backwards"
TIMOTHY A. CLARY / Staff / Getty Images
ByPaul Bois
@PaulBois39
July 6, 2018
3.4k views
Because President Trump plans to revoke the Obama administration's guidelines on affirmative action, he is "against minorities," according to Spanish-speaking Telemundo.
Under the headline "Trump Against Minorities," Telemundo reports that Trump has it out for minorities, when, in fact, his new policy was applauded by Asian-Americans, who have been unfairly discriminated against due to affirmative action.
"This is a triumphant moment for Asian American communities," the Asian American Coalition for Education said in a statement following the Trump administration’s action.
Here's how Telemundo reported it:
President Trump’s administration has put an end to the practice of universities that favor the admission of racial and gender minorities to promote diversity. The suspension breaks with the guidelines that began to be applied in 2011 under the administration of Barrack Obama, in a policy called Affirmative Action. Under the new system, schools will stop considering race as a criteria of admission. Civil rights groups raised their voice against the new measure, that they consider a step backwards.
How exactly is is a "step backwards" for schools to treat everyone as equal, Telemundo did not say
How many billions of gallons of liberal tears since nov. 8 2016?
Sheriff Joe
DA
I feel like Noah.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Europeans leaders worry Trump wants to fulfill promise to bring American troops home
By Anita Kumar And Franco Ordoñez
July 06, 2018 05:00 AM
Washington
After 18 months of Donald Trump's "America First" presidency, European leaders meeting with him next week fear the United States may change its traditional course and begin to bring American troops home from the continent.
It comes as nations, especially in Eastern Europe, are lobbying the United States to increase the number of troops on the continent as they worry about combating an increasingly aggressive Russia.
Trump has talked about bringing U.S. troops home from around the globe since he was on the campaign trail espousing a strategy he dubbed "America First” but he has yet to act.
Read More
Trump’s UN speech delivers just what his voters wanted
"They are scared to death," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told McClatchy. "They are worried about a very unpredictable president of the United States. They are increasingly worried he is going to do things not based on what's in the best interest..but based solely on his vision of 'America First.' "
The Pentagon is already reviewing the impact of withdrawing some of the 35,000 active-duty American troops in Germany, the Washington Post reported last month.
The fate of American troops in Europe are not expected to be on the agenda of the Brussels meeting of NATO — the alliance formed after World War II to counter a Soviet, now Russian, threat — but will loom large, as it comes just before Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland.
Some worry an unpredictable Trump, at the U.S.-Russia summit, could agree to take the first steps to embolden Russia, such as halting military exercises or agreeing that Crimea, a region of Ukraine annexed by Russia in 2014, belongs to Russia.
Magnus Nordenman, who worked as a defense analyst and a strategic planning consultant for major European defense industry companies, said European allies are "absolutely worried" after hearing Trump disparage allies of the G-7, as well as NATO members' contributions and seeing him eager to meet Putin as well as North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
"There is element of uncertainty in all this," said Nordenman, now the director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. "But we all need to take a bit of a breath here...and hope the president is in a good mood when he goes to Brussels."
A senior administration official with knowledge of the situation but not authorized to speak publicly did not initially answer the question about possible troop withdrawals on a conference call with reporters. But when asked a second time, the official said Trump is not expected to threaten troop withdrawals in Germany or elsewhere.
Congress is likely to oppose troop withdrawals and could pass legislation to prevent Trump from using money to move the military.
Trump has criticized international alliances and organizations, even the United Nations, and European allies fear he is less committed to their security and NATO as previous U.S. presidents. Last month, he abruptly refused to sign a joint statement with the G-7, the world's largest economies following a meeting in Canada.
“At a time when the transatlantic relationship between Europe and the U.S. is under a lot of pressure over disagreements on Iran and trade, NATO is really at the core of this relationship and will Trump — by basically criticizing the Europeans and conditioning American support — bring more disunity within the alliance," said Erik Brattberg, director of the Carnegie Endowment's Europe program who is in touch with a few diplomats who are concerned about Trump’s possible reduction of troops. "It would weaken the alliance and provide new opportunities for countries like Russia to take advantage of that.”
A third of active-duty U.S. military troops overseas — more than 60,000 — are stationed in Europe, including 35,000 in Germany, 12,000 in Italy, 8,500 in the United Kingdom and 3,300 in Spain, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of information from the Defense Manpower Data Center, a statistical arm of the Defense Department. Thousands more rotate into other European countries temporarily.
Many U.S. troops are there to do more than protect those countries. They are strategically located to help in other regions of the world, such as counter Iran or strike the Islamic State.
The Trump administration has been supportive of NATO and European countries at a tactical level — actions generally credited to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. It has sent more military equipment, participated in regional exercises, signed new defense agreements with Sweden and Finland and increased the number of Marines in Norway on a rotational basis by 350 and in Poland by a battalion.
Poland, Romania and the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have been asking the U.S. for additional troops for several years. Poland is willing to spend up to $2 billion to lobby the U.S. to build a permanent military base there, according to a Defense Ministry proposal.
Still, Trump has repeatedly threatened to punish countries if they don't spend enough on defense, even suggesting the U.S. may not protect them if they don't pay their fair share. That's in direct contradiction of NATO's pledge that an attack against one member is considered an attack against all of them.
"That’s the question: Is the U.S. security conditional?" asked Heather Conley, who served as a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau for European and Eurasian Affairs for Bush and is now a senior vice president at the Center for Strategic & International Studies.
Read More
Trump stuns NATO leaders by reverting to scolding campaign message
In June, he sent letters to several allies complaining they are not abiding by a 2014 commitment to spend 2 percent of their gross domestic product on national defense. Kay Bailey Hutchison, U.S. ambassador to NATO, said this week that all 29 NATO members are increasing defense spending with 16 of them on track to meet the 2 percent goal.
Daniel DePetris, a military expert as at Defense Priorities, a D.C.-based foreign policy organization focused on a strong military and restrained foreign policy that is in periodic conversations with the Trump administration, said the countries either don’t believe Russia is a real threat to them or that the U.S. will protect them.
“Either they have to step up and do what’s rational based on their economic power or it is appropriate for us to reduce our contingent over there," he said
By Anita Kumar And Franco Ordoñez
July 06, 2018 05:00 AM
Washington
After 18 months of Donald Trump's "America First" presidency, European leaders meeting with him next week fear the United States may change its traditional course and begin to bring American troops home from the continent.
It comes as nations, especially in Eastern Europe, are lobbying the United States to increase the number of troops on the continent as they worry about combating an increasingly aggressive Russia.
Trump has talked about bringing U.S. troops home from around the globe since he was on the campaign trail espousing a strategy he dubbed "America First” but he has yet to act.
Read More
Trump’s UN speech delivers just what his voters wanted
"They are scared to death," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told McClatchy. "They are worried about a very unpredictable president of the United States. They are increasingly worried he is going to do things not based on what's in the best interest..but based solely on his vision of 'America First.' "
The Pentagon is already reviewing the impact of withdrawing some of the 35,000 active-duty American troops in Germany, the Washington Post reported last month.
The fate of American troops in Europe are not expected to be on the agenda of the Brussels meeting of NATO — the alliance formed after World War II to counter a Soviet, now Russian, threat — but will loom large, as it comes just before Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland.
Some worry an unpredictable Trump, at the U.S.-Russia summit, could agree to take the first steps to embolden Russia, such as halting military exercises or agreeing that Crimea, a region of Ukraine annexed by Russia in 2014, belongs to Russia.
Magnus Nordenman, who worked as a defense analyst and a strategic planning consultant for major European defense industry companies, said European allies are "absolutely worried" after hearing Trump disparage allies of the G-7, as well as NATO members' contributions and seeing him eager to meet Putin as well as North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
"There is element of uncertainty in all this," said Nordenman, now the director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. "But we all need to take a bit of a breath here...and hope the president is in a good mood when he goes to Brussels."
A senior administration official with knowledge of the situation but not authorized to speak publicly did not initially answer the question about possible troop withdrawals on a conference call with reporters. But when asked a second time, the official said Trump is not expected to threaten troop withdrawals in Germany or elsewhere.
Congress is likely to oppose troop withdrawals and could pass legislation to prevent Trump from using money to move the military.
Trump has criticized international alliances and organizations, even the United Nations, and European allies fear he is less committed to their security and NATO as previous U.S. presidents. Last month, he abruptly refused to sign a joint statement with the G-7, the world's largest economies following a meeting in Canada.
“At a time when the transatlantic relationship between Europe and the U.S. is under a lot of pressure over disagreements on Iran and trade, NATO is really at the core of this relationship and will Trump — by basically criticizing the Europeans and conditioning American support — bring more disunity within the alliance," said Erik Brattberg, director of the Carnegie Endowment's Europe program who is in touch with a few diplomats who are concerned about Trump’s possible reduction of troops. "It would weaken the alliance and provide new opportunities for countries like Russia to take advantage of that.”
A third of active-duty U.S. military troops overseas — more than 60,000 — are stationed in Europe, including 35,000 in Germany, 12,000 in Italy, 8,500 in the United Kingdom and 3,300 in Spain, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of information from the Defense Manpower Data Center, a statistical arm of the Defense Department. Thousands more rotate into other European countries temporarily.
Many U.S. troops are there to do more than protect those countries. They are strategically located to help in other regions of the world, such as counter Iran or strike the Islamic State.
The Trump administration has been supportive of NATO and European countries at a tactical level — actions generally credited to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. It has sent more military equipment, participated in regional exercises, signed new defense agreements with Sweden and Finland and increased the number of Marines in Norway on a rotational basis by 350 and in Poland by a battalion.
Poland, Romania and the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have been asking the U.S. for additional troops for several years. Poland is willing to spend up to $2 billion to lobby the U.S. to build a permanent military base there, according to a Defense Ministry proposal.
Still, Trump has repeatedly threatened to punish countries if they don't spend enough on defense, even suggesting the U.S. may not protect them if they don't pay their fair share. That's in direct contradiction of NATO's pledge that an attack against one member is considered an attack against all of them.
"That’s the question: Is the U.S. security conditional?" asked Heather Conley, who served as a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau for European and Eurasian Affairs for Bush and is now a senior vice president at the Center for Strategic & International Studies.
Read More
Trump stuns NATO leaders by reverting to scolding campaign message
In June, he sent letters to several allies complaining they are not abiding by a 2014 commitment to spend 2 percent of their gross domestic product on national defense. Kay Bailey Hutchison, U.S. ambassador to NATO, said this week that all 29 NATO members are increasing defense spending with 16 of them on track to meet the 2 percent goal.
Daniel DePetris, a military expert as at Defense Priorities, a D.C.-based foreign policy organization focused on a strong military and restrained foreign policy that is in periodic conversations with the Trump administration, said the countries either don’t believe Russia is a real threat to them or that the U.S. will protect them.
“Either they have to step up and do what’s rational based on their economic power or it is appropriate for us to reduce our contingent over there," he said
The funniest/saddest thing from yesterday is when Trump dumps on Bush and praises Putin and Kim and all the cultist spank their monkeys like "yeah! You tell 'em!" Do these clowns even care or it is just monster truck rallies without the deisel fumes? Could Trump show up and be like "Mike Pence? What is that hair cut? Calls his wife Mother? What does that mean? But Idi Amin, some say he's a murderer, but he was a just another fat guy..." And the Montana Maga would all be like "Yeahhhhh. I-di! I-di!"
Oh, and goodnight Paulie Nobail. I did hear he gets his own shower in solitary, so that's nice. And food is slipped through a slot, so it's like grubhub, for inmates.
Oh, and goodnight Paulie Nobail. I did hear he gets his own shower in solitary, so that's nice. And food is slipped through a slot, so it's like grubhub, for inmates.
When are Paulie and the gang gonna make meatballs and pay off the guards to bring in lobster and red and white 'talian table cloths?
And the nutters here get right in line.
You just wish you knew how to make meatballs like Paulie Nobail.
Bruddah IZ
DA
You Bush loyalist crack me up!
Hüsker Dü
DA
Civility matters, there is no reason to kick a man in failing health who just lost his wife. Only a scumbag like Trump would do such a thing for his own personal aims, and only scumbags would applaud.