I'm aware of that, explain it to the Duck.The First Amendment protects one from prior censorship (most of the time). There is no guarantee of protection from consequences.
I'm aware of that, explain it to the Duck.The First Amendment protects one from prior censorship (most of the time). There is no guarantee of protection from consequences.
I might be.You're not into eliminating racists from public employment?
I might be.
What do you think about those who teach at public universities?
Who decides which are racist and which are not?
I don't say that. I didn't say that. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy on the left.
The left wing progressives say it and allow like minded progressives to practice it.
"He only lied about sex". " She only erased 30,000 "personal" emails, that by the way, were ender subpoena".
8900o children separated from their parents at the border. Hardly a peep.
1900 children separated from their parents at the border. Outrage & disgust.
Harry Reid changing Senate rules to allow a simple majority to confirm federal judges. Hardly a peep.
Now, using Reid's rule change, the Republican's are going to confirm SCOTUS appointees the same way. Outrage and disgust.
What goes around comes around. Unfortunately, you apparently don't get it.
Go for a bike ride duck, might do you well.
Lets see you figure that out.For example?
Lets see you figure that out.
You pass this test, and I may be on board.
I didnt think so.Is this one of your "all of them" responses? (think Palin)
I didnt think so.
Dumb old dog on the front porch.
So, for you, pointing out the hypocrisy from the left is an avoidance tactic? Does it absolve the sins of the right? . . . or do you just want to ignore that?I don't say that. I didn't say that. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy on the left.
The left wing progressives say it and allow like minded progressives to practice it.
"He only lied about sex". " She only erased 30,000 "personal" emails, that by the way, were ender subpoena".
8900o children separated from their parents at the border. Hardly a peep.
1900 children separated from their parents at the border. Outrage & disgust.
Harry Reid changing Senate rules to allow a simple majority to confirm federal judges. Hardly a peep.
Now, using Reid's rule change, the Republican's are going to confirm SCOTUS appointees the same way. Outrage and disgust.
What goes around comes around. Unfortunately, you apparently don't get it.
Go for a bike ride duck, might do you well.
From the "snopes" page.
From the "snopes" page.
Official figures are not available for the number of children taken from families while their parents underwent criminal prosecution after being detained at the border during Obama’s tenure as president. We asked the Department of Homeland Security for those numbers and received no response.
sucker.
I dont need no stinking badges.Are you contending that that justifies the picture you posted?
Anyone who thinks "snopes" is some kind of scientific truthiness standard is a herd animal.
Anyone who thinks snopes plays it down the middle is a tool.
They report the meme as "false" then turn around and say they dont know.
They dont have the numbers.What did they get wrong about the immigrant children separation situation?
All I see when you post is, "Baaaaah,....baaaaaaaahh,....baaaaaah.."Did you decide that before you read it?
They dont have the numbers.
They readily admit that in their "fact" check.
If they had integrity, they would have concluded something like, "not proven".
All I see when you post is, "Baaaaah,....baaaaaaaahh,....baaaaaah.."