The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Friesland said:
Yes. You are full of it. You just make crap up to argue. You haven't even characterized the entire discussion correctly - it started over Racist Joe's "question" whether the Dow falling off the cliff at the moment Trump announced tariffs wasn't due to "omnibus spending..."

Here's the exchange cut and pasted from just above your post:

Friesland said: ↑
Are you really claiming that tariffs and QE distort price and markets in the same way at the same rate? Ok.

Bro IZ:
I’ve actually said the exact opposite from the very beginning. Which is why you got all spooled up in the first place. Remember?

Fries said:
Uh, no. Now you're just lying.

Bruddah IZ said: ↑
Show me.

Friesland said: ↑
Uh... you just wrote it. Verbatim.

BRO IZ: "Are you really doubting that tariffs and QE effects prices and supply and demand in exactly the same way? Especially, since you consider it "first week econ 101a". You seem conflicted. I don't remember any epidemiological analogies in that first week of economics either. I somewhat agree that my point might be too broad for most. But F.A. Hayek said it best in describing economics. "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to man how little he knows about what he imagines he can design". Both QE and tariffs have repeatedly shown us how our government becomes the "con" in economics. I assume that you'll default to the, "but we need government to protect us from the ill effects of the market". That's fine, I'm for private property rights, easy taxes, and the rule of law. Both QE and tariffs obscure the law and rob the citizen of their hard earned savings and property. There is a broad explanation for what I just posted. It goes beyond fir. st we
ek econ but I started this thread with money and interest rates. You should start there and I'll be happy to provide further explanations if you require them. Laced and I had a very good conversation concerning money and how it really works.

There is not a single national economic policy that even comes close to distorting the markets like QE does. A broader conversation is needed but since you find it "too broad to be interesting or informative" you remain uninformed while some of the basics are discussed and solidified in the initial post of this thread.

Pure markets become fantasy whenever QE or tariffs are employed. The history of the negative effects of QE type monetary policy and tariffs are well documented for those who don't find economics "too broad to be interesting or informative".......in the real world that is."

Friesland said:
I think maybe you're just crazy.

I was right earlier - you have some weird oppositional disorder and just argue to argue... Which is fine, but I'm not really interested in the runaround.

Anyway, I'll be on the road for a while so you can argue with yourself now...
Click to expand...

Enjoy the road and watch CNN/MSNBC melt down over the next five to seven days....

And ....wash your hands.
 
Friesland said:
Yes. You are full of it. You just make crap up to argue. You haven't even characterized the entire discussion correctly - it started over Racist Joe's "question" whether the Dow falling off the cliff at the moment Trump announced tariffs wasn't due to "omnibus spending..."

Here's the exchange cut and pasted from just above your post:

Friesland said: ↑
Are you really claiming that tariffs and QE distort price and markets in the same way at the same rate? Ok.

Bro IZ:
I’ve actually said the exact opposite from the very beginning. Which is why you got all spooled up in the first place. Remember?

Fries said:
Uh, no. Now you're just lying.

Bruddah IZ said: ↑
Show me.

Friesland said: ↑
Uh... you just wrote it. Verbatim.

BRO IZ: "Are you really doubting that tariffs and QE effects prices and supply and demand in exactly the same way? Especially, since you consider it "first week econ 101a". You seem conflicted. I don't remember any epidemiological analogies in that first week of economics either. I somewhat agree that my point might be too broad for most. But F.A. Hayek said it best in describing economics. "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to man how little he knows about what he imagines he can design". Both QE and tariffs have repeatedly shown us how our government becomes the "con" in economics. I assume that you'll default to the, "but we need government to protect us from the ill effects of the market". That's fine, I'm for private property rights, easy taxes, and the rule of law. Both QE and tariffs obscure the law and rob the citizen of their hard earned savings and property. There is a broad explanation for what I just posted. It goes beyond fir. st we
ek econ but I started this thread with money and interest rates. You should start there and I'll be happy to provide further explanations if you require them. Laced and I had a very good conversation concerning money and how it really works.

There is not a single national economic policy that even comes close to distorting the markets like QE does. A broader conversation is needed but since you find it "too broad to be interesting or informative" you remain uninformed while some of the basics are discussed and solidified in the initial post of this thread.

Pure markets become fantasy whenever QE or tariffs are employed. The history of the negative effects of QE type monetary policy and tariffs are well documented for those who don't find economics "too broad to be interesting or informative".......in the real world that is."

Friesland said:
I think maybe you're just crazy.

I was right earlier - you have some weird oppositional disorder and just argue to argue... Which is fine, but I'm not really interested in the runaround.

Anyway, I'll be on the road for a while so you can argue with yourself now...
Click to expand...
Got it. No broad arguments for you. Just unrelated face saving analogies and a poor understanding of prices and supply and demand.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Got it. No broad arguments for you. Just unrelated face saving analogies and a poor understanding of prices and supply and demand.
Click to expand...


Slinger has " Ping Pong " logic.....
When contained it's scatter affect is minimal.
When let loose from the DNC " Shoe Box " of Fantasy it's dangerous.
That's how " manipulated " Civil Wars start !
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Got it. No broad arguments for you. Just unrelated face saving analogies and a poor understanding of prices and supply and demand.
Click to expand...

You completely reversed youself in 3 posts. A complete 180. It's right there in black and white, and you still want to pretend you didn't. It's a joke and you're a clown.
 
Is the letter really that big, or is it just t's tiny hands that make it look that way?

trumpkimletter_060118wh.jpg
 
Friesland said:
You completely reversed youself in 3 posts. A complete 180. It's right there in black and white, and you still want to pretend you didn't. It's a joke and you're a clown.
Click to expand...
No. You presumed that I meant something that I did not. Both policies do increase prices because of how supply is limited. But youʻre not a big fan of broader discussions. At least I thought you werenʻt until you locked in to the exactness of the magnitudes of tariffs, ex ante, vs. QE, ex post. But make no mistake, both policies increase prices as opposed to reducing prices via non-protectionist policies like QE and tariffs. That is not a 180. Thatʻs just a broader discussion. Lol
 
Bruddah IZ said:
No. You presumed that I meant something that I did not. Both policies do increase prices because of how supply is limited. But youʻre not a big fan of broader discussions. At least I thought you werenʻt until you locked in to the exactness of the magnitudes of tariffs, ex ante, vs. QE, ex post. But make no mistake, both policies increase prices as opposed to reducing prices via non-protectionist policies like QE and tariffs. That is not a 180. Thatʻs just a broader discussion. Lol
Click to expand...

I figured it out: you're not a liar. Your recollection just keeps changing...
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure I'm able to deem myself king of the world if I want . . . won't do any good, but if it makes you feel better . . .
Click to expand...

It can be done....but it won't be done, because of the destruction it will
bring upon our long standing principals....Moral Principals.
Now you will say Trump has no Morals, but you and other Liberals are
wrong......The group at present that lacks any Morals is the Clown
Show run by the Ring leader Robert Mueller and authorized by RR....
This June 5th IG report might not cover his sorry ass, but it will cover all
those who have surrounded him and created the present Criminal
Operation that HE is investigating....His ass is on the BBQ for the
Uranium One Scandal and what he's done to people with
his " Special " Council....
 
Erections have consequences,
SCOTUS Throws Out Case on Illegal Alien Teenager Right to Abortion
500EmailGoogle+Twitter

ultrasound-afp-640x480.jpg

AFP/File FRED DUFOUR
4 Jun 2018Washington, DC20
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday unanimously threw out a lower court’s decision that had held that when the U.S. government has a pregnant illegal alien teenager in custody, the government must facilitate the teenager’s obtaining an abortion if she wants one. The nation’s highest court held that the case was moot, and struck the lower court’s decision from the books.
 
Supreme Court Sides with Masterpiece Cakeshop in Same-Sex Wedding Ruling
2522EmailGoogle+Twitter

AP_17293510046223-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley
4 Jun 2018274
The Supreme Court granted a narrow victory to people of faith on Monday, holding 7-2 that the Constitution did not allow the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to order Christian baker Jack Phillips to bake a wedding cake for same-sex weddings because a commissioner said Phillips’ Christian beliefs on marriage were “despicable.”


The Court left open for another case the broader question of whether the government can force people of faith to participate in same-sex weddings when the government does not openly show open hostility to their religious beliefs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top