T 2.0

espola said:
Showing the video to the class? Perhaps yes, with parental approval.

Claiming he deserved to be shot? No.

Note: My opinions are based on the screenshot of the headline only. I have not reviewed the actual article nor the actual video nor the facts of this case.
Click to expand...
What would be the purpose of showing a man getting assassinated and blood shooting out everywhere?
 
watfly said:
The companies have every right to do this, but this one feels like "cancel culture" to me. He's a late night TV host. He's not an educator, a health care giver or anyone in a position of authority that is subject to a strict code of conduct or professional standards. Plus what he said was pretty tame. Although, he's not funny, I don't think our comedians should be censored.
Click to expand...
It is cancel culture. I remember several republicans suffering from it during the summer of George. Payback's a bitch.
 
espola said:
Kimmel screwed up when he proposed that Kirk's assassin was part of the "maga crowd" without any evidence. And he did it in a way that could not be seen as a parody of t's hate speech as in the way that the Gavinator's support group has been doing.
Click to expand...
Network television is legally obligated to serve the public good. One (or the FCC) could argue that lying about the political affiliation of the shooter because you're of the opposite affiliation doesn't serve the public good. How's that for a rabbit hole to go down?
 
watfly said:
Network television is legally obligated to serve the public good. One (or the FCC) could argue that lying about the political affiliation of the shooter because you're of the opposite affiliation doesn't serve the public good. How's that for a rabbit hole to go down?
Click to expand...
1758240532240.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top