whatithink
GOLD
Yeah, I'm fine with eliminating waste, but there's so much noise over something so small in relative terms. The goal here apparently is to cut 10% of fed employees, so save $35B annually. That's no small amount, but its also .001% of the federal budget.I've already stated that I'm against the blanket firings. No question that there is a performative element to the request, but when you're dealing with hundred of thousands of employees in our bloated government its a very efficient way to sort through fat. Particularly to identify ghost employees and employees that have completely checked out. It also sends the message that the free lunch is over.
Unfortunately, this is an example of the extremes that our country is facing. On one side you have mass firings and funding freezes. On the other side you have 14 Democrat AG's trying to block the Chief Executive of our country from investigating government agencies by filing completely frivolous lawsuits. Between the two, I will take hyper accountability over protecting widespread political grift.
Meanwhile the Senate is looking to spend another $350B in new spending, and the House is looking to add $50B annually for the next 10 years, while adding $4T to the debt in the next 2.
There's a lot of theatre going on which is being lapped up, but unless someone comes up with a budget at or below $5.5T, this is all clear BS. The budget after that should be $5T and so on down.
Its both parties btw, that's crystal clear, even currently.