I’m not comparing male and female paths. I’m comparing environments that improves a players development to environments that maximize a players development potential. I used an example from the male side to illustrate. I have no idea what you are talking about.
What part of OM was playing up for top club in DA for U15 and still kicking ass don’t you understand? That was why she was considered. Playing with 14 year olds on the top level. Nothing more, nothing less.
You are absolutely correct sir. My player began distinguishing herself at 10.
I’ve been following this thread. I can’t comment on the path to uswnt. I can tell you that your player should focus on track to help her soccer skills. cross country will bring more knee issues for your player. She can do the 1 mile and 800m in track. Running every day on cross country will not help her soccer development. These kids run so much and those 8 mile training days are too much for any soccer player
His dad moved to Germany to coach.
I see what your saying. I was responding to earlier in life. But, he signed a pro contract with a Borussia Dortmund. His family only moved to be there with him.
Thanks for following the thread bro. We went from, "why top dog clubs can reschedule a big game anytime they want" to Dre feeling his kid was not given the same opportunity as the great one. My dd practiced and scrimmaged for years against the great one and Turner, Rodman and Jackson every week and based on what my eyes can see, three of the four are top top players, moo!!
Good morning homie. For the past few days the focus has been on my small equal opportunity claim against USSF. I think today we should begin the discussion about the big equal opportunity claim that I have against USSF.
Easy on crush Dre and I am not a scary little punk, I am a papa bear. I'm shocked you would lump me in with all the rest but that's you being you. It hurts like hell homie. BTW, I was told & sold that the GDA was 100% going to be fully funded in early 2016 and my dd was offered fully funded free rides from four clubs bro. This was way before the GDA was even started. Keep in mine originally slated to start with 03 and 04s were regulated to ECNL and that is a hole never story.Good morning homie. For the past few days the focus has been on my small equal opportunity claim against USSF. I think today we should begin the discussion about the big equal opportunity claim that I have against USSF.
In short USSF getting rid of the GDA because of Covid was a pre-text because I was on them like a fly on shit. Covid was a convenient excuse to get out of dodge but I already had their lame asses in my sights.
So, I have a question for you and the rest of the scary punk ass dads of the 10,000 ballers in US Soccer.
Why were y’all okay with boys having fully funded academies and not girls? Why are y’all okay with USSF only offering Nike Project 40/Generation Adidas contracts to males and not females? Discuss.
Generation Adidas - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
My bad. My intent was not to hurt; I’m just heckling.
Well, it hurt me because I a Hawk dad bro, not a punk, ass kissing pops looking for his 3 to be invited to virtual camp so look good on email to college coach. There lies the problem with this dad. I have eyes that see and no 3 should be anywhere near a real Camp.
Also, to all you losers who used to PM Ellejustus threats with where I live, where my dd better not attend school and to those who tell me to watch my back at Silver Lakes, you all can kiss my ass This is me just talking smack with words. Dont get all huffy & puffy today. These are going to be epic days soon where fairness & merit rule the nest, not pay to play so my 3 can look like a 5....lolFrom the wiki page, Generation Adidas is a joint venture between the MLS & USSF. The MLS is a male league, so that would explain to me why it doesn't apply to females. I thought the women's league is sponsored by Nike, so maybe Nike don't want to sponsor a project 40 for the women, which would be their prerogative. Have at it though.Good morning homie. For the past few days the focus has been on my small equal opportunity claim against USSF. I think today we should begin the discussion about the big equal opportunity claim that I have against USSF.
In short USSF getting rid of the GDA because of Covid was a pre-text because I was on them like a fly on shit. Covid was a convenient excuse to get out of dodge but I already had their lame asses in my sights.
So, I have a question for you and the rest of the scary punk ass dads of the 10,000 ballers in US Soccer.
Why were y’all okay with boys having fully funded academies and not girls? Why are y’all okay with USSF only offering Nike Project 40/Generation Adidas contracts to males and not females? Discuss.
Generation Adidas - Wikipedia
Based on the conversations at the time there were multiple camps of parents during GDA, I'm sure I'm missing a few others:
Good stuff homie but you are moving way too fast. Consider this. Nike/Adidas has given USSF a fuckton of money to develop the game in the US. USSF has unilaterally decided that money is only for the development of men in the MLS and not women in the NWSL; why? USSF also paid Beasley, Dempsey etc. to train and live at IMG; they paid for their flights around the world; they paid for male players to make weekly flights from various locations for league games in the USL; why?
NWSL wouldn't exist without US soccer. They spend millions every year subsidizing it. NWSL want to be independent while still taking millions annually from US soccer.
Owner funding and player development money are separate and distinct. Obviously, one is money for owners and the other is money for players.
