Hi, I think this is a really good piece of information. The different approaches to dealing with Covid-19 will definitely have different results. My biggest issue, and this is just an observation, is much of the data and analysis is so binary. Meaning its mortality rate, its this, or that...its singular. I'm guilty of it. This is a multi faceted situation and if you focus on only one area only, you will disregard others that make an impact to society, country, commerce, well being, etc.. Think of weather...which area of the world is best? If you focus on just temperature, you are eliminating, humidity, wind, precipitation, elevation, etc. from the equation and may leave out a better place. My vote is San Diego...used to live there...I think this is the same in terms of the many factors that need to be determined to figure out the right course of action for dealing with this. It is so multi-faceted that there are so many variables to consider. We can all focus on one area, spin a narrative one way or the other (not blaming or pointing fingers at anyone...just replied to
@espola 's post because I thought the data point was intriguing), but there are a combination of variables that are in play to come up with the best solution for our country in terms of how to deal with this and move forward. It is very dynamic. Lots of perspectives and views. Nobody and I mean nobody wants people to die. Nobody wants others to be in financial ruin, distress, without food, shelter, lose their livelihoods, homes, etc. People have different perspectives based on their experiences, and some feel more strongly than others regarding guidance provided, freedoms, choice, data, etc. There is a balance or Goldilocks Zone here somewhere. I just hope our elected leaders can find it before we all beat the shit out of each other. Its getting ugly out there and on here.