Simple Science

For security and reliability, an average of two months of national demand for hydrocarbons are in storage at any time. Today, barely two hours of national electricity demand can be stored in all utility-scale batteries plus all batteries in one million electric cars in America.
 
If batteries scaled like digital tech, a battery the size of a book, costing three cents, could power a jetliner to Asia. That only happens in comic books.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
If batteries scaled like digital tech, a battery the size of a book, costing three cents, could power a jetliner to Asia. That only happens in comic books.
Click to expand...

www.manhattan-institute.org

The "New Energy Economy": An Exercise in Magical Thinking

A movement has been growing for decades to replace hydrocarbons, which collectively supply 84% of the world’s energy. Energy expert, Mark Mills, explains why replacing hydrocarbons will not meet America's energy demands.
www.manhattan-institute.org www.manhattan-institute.org
 
https://fee.org/articles/solar-panels-produce-tons-of-toxic-waste-literally/
Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally
A closer look at solar panels opens a wide array of questions that need answers.
Monday, November 18, 2019

Stanford Magazine also points out that solar energy has a higher carbon footprint than wind and nuclear energy. Ray Weiss, a professor of Geochemistry at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, explains that a number of solar panels release nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), a chemical compound 17,000 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. As recently as 2015, he explained that many manufacturers were still struggling to figure out how to contain its release into the atmosphere.
 
Question the Narrative

Energy policy is not a place for emotion or action based on instinct. We throw around a lot of buzz words that lead us to the belief that one energy supply is "cleaner" than the other. The reality is that human action and interaction require a constant supply of energy. All forms of energy production have an impact on the environment.

Questioning certain narratives regarding the eco-friendliness of those classified as "renewable" but do not live up to an environmental standard that reasonable people could support is essential to both innovation and environmental protection.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
https://fee.org/articles/solar-panels-produce-tons-of-toxic-waste-literally/
Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally
A closer look at solar panels opens a wide array of questions that need answers.
Monday, November 18, 2019

Stanford Magazine also points out that solar energy has a higher carbon footprint than wind and nuclear energy. Ray Weiss, a professor of Geochemistry at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, explains that a number of solar panels release nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), a chemical compound 17,000 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. As recently as 2015, he explained that many manufacturers were still struggling to figure out how to contain its release into the atmosphere.
Click to expand...

From the Stanford Magazine article you didn't bother to read --

1574740868088.png
 
espola said:
Overall, the Stanford Magazine article was spoke favorably of increasing the solar photovoltaic infrastructure.

Did you think no one was going to read it, or were you just passing along FEE's ignorance?
Click to expand...
“Fee.org...media for the new America. Really dumb but proud of it.”
 
espola said:
Overall, the Stanford Magazine article was spoke favorably of increasing the solar photovoltaic infrastructure.

Did you think no one was going to read it, or were you just passing along FEE's ignorance?
Click to expand...
What did FEE ignore that you obviously did?
 
Bruddah IZ said:
What did FEE ignore that you obviously did?
Click to expand...

Why is fee.org so opposed to the development of the American solar power industry that they are willing to lie to their loyal clients?

An even more personal question (for you) is why you keep on biting on their bait and then displaying your gullibility in public?
 
espola said:
Why is fee.org so opposed to the development of the American solar power industry that they are willing to lie to their loyal clients?

An even more personal question (for you) is why you keep on biting on their bait and then displaying your gullibility in public?
Click to expand...
Your ignorance for one.
 
CalSTRS faces calls to divest from fossil-fuel investments

At CalSTRS' recent investment committee meeting, a large group that included about 40 school children armed with signs, banners and stuffed animals, urged the committee to divest from fossil fuels and to add divestment as a tool in the California State Teachers' Retirement System's governance policy. Speakers, including many of the students whose comments were not broadcast by CalSTRS to protect their privacy, urged CalSTRS to divest, according to videos posted on the website of Fossil Free California.

https://www.pionline.com/esg/calstr...GlyScDiPZIi_OdmLkQ7o57NuHvP3OIztKjHNUvPLZYJb8
 
espola said:
Is there some place you can name in California where the plants need more CO2?
Click to expand...

Everywhere meathead......it's a regulating function of this - 6CO2 + 6H20 + (energy) → C6H12O6 + 6O2

Prove me wrong with a detailed breakdown and explain why a higher % is detrimental at the current levels
of Nitrogen 78 % as opposed to the .03 % of CO2 in the atmosphere....
Remember to calculate the 65 - 80 % dissolving of CO2 into the Oceans of the Earth over multiple years...
Remember to calculate the total output of ALL generators as opposed to losses....

Have at it LIAR.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top