Simple Science

So shut down happens when there is not enough wind or too much wind. That's a lot of windmills to shut down. It's a good thing non- CO2 producing Nuclear Power plants on 82 naval warships are accident free and provide perfect models for the U.S. That is if we are serious about CO2 reduction. You know? Food for the plants?

Is there some place you can name in California where the plants need more CO2?
 
If solar power scaled like computer-tech, a single postage-stamp-size solar array would power the Empire State Building. That only happens in comic books.
 
For security and reliability, an average of two months of national demand for hydrocarbons are in storage at any time. Today, barely two hours of national electricity demand can be stored in all utility-scale batteries plus all batteries in one million electric cars in America.
 
If batteries scaled like digital tech, a battery the size of a book, costing three cents, could power a jetliner to Asia. That only happens in comic books.
 
If batteries scaled like digital tech, a battery the size of a book, costing three cents, could power a jetliner to Asia. That only happens in comic books.

 
https://fee.org/articles/solar-panels-produce-tons-of-toxic-waste-literally/
Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally
A closer look at solar panels opens a wide array of questions that need answers.
Monday, November 18, 2019

Stanford Magazine also points out that solar energy has a higher carbon footprint than wind and nuclear energy. Ray Weiss, a professor of Geochemistry at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, explains that a number of solar panels release nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), a chemical compound 17,000 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. As recently as 2015, he explained that many manufacturers were still struggling to figure out how to contain its release into the atmosphere.
 
Question the Narrative

Energy policy is not a place for emotion or action based on instinct. We throw around a lot of buzz words that lead us to the belief that one energy supply is "cleaner" than the other. The reality is that human action and interaction require a constant supply of energy. All forms of energy production have an impact on the environment.

Questioning certain narratives regarding the eco-friendliness of those classified as "renewable" but do not live up to an environmental standard that reasonable people could support is essential to both innovation and environmental protection.
 
https://fee.org/articles/solar-panels-produce-tons-of-toxic-waste-literally/
Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally
A closer look at solar panels opens a wide array of questions that need answers.
Monday, November 18, 2019

Stanford Magazine also points out that solar energy has a higher carbon footprint than wind and nuclear energy. Ray Weiss, a professor of Geochemistry at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, explains that a number of solar panels release nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), a chemical compound 17,000 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. As recently as 2015, he explained that many manufacturers were still struggling to figure out how to contain its release into the atmosphere.

From the Stanford Magazine article you didn't bother to read --

1574740868088.png
 
Overall, the Stanford Magazine article was spoke favorably of increasing the solar photovoltaic infrastructure.

Did you think no one was going to read it, or were you just passing along FEE's ignorance?
“Fee.org...media for the new America. Really dumb but proud of it.”
 
Overall, the Stanford Magazine article was spoke favorably of increasing the solar photovoltaic infrastructure.

Did you think no one was going to read it, or were you just passing along FEE's ignorance?
What did FEE ignore that you obviously did?
 
What did FEE ignore that you obviously did?

Why is fee.org so opposed to the development of the American solar power industry that they are willing to lie to their loyal clients?

An even more personal question (for you) is why you keep on biting on their bait and then displaying your gullibility in public?
 
Why is fee.org so opposed to the development of the American solar power industry that they are willing to lie to their loyal clients?

An even more personal question (for you) is why you keep on biting on their bait and then displaying your gullibility in public?
Your ignorance for one.
 
Back
Top