Bruddah IZ
DA
Tell us about the economics of San Onofre and why economics is important given the CO2 barrel weʻre looking down.
Simple Science
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
Bruddah IZ
DA
Nuclear not as dangerous as messpola thinks or doesnʻt think. Economics? I canʻt wait for the specifics.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Funny though. Nuclear energy too political for everyone but the government. The U.S. has 82 total nuclear power plants patroling the oceans of the world without a Red October to speak of.
The bungled replacement of the steam generators at San Onofre Units 2 and 3 caused the abandonment of power generation at the facility. Politicians and lawyers are arguing who will pay the cost - ratepayers, shareholders, Mitsubishi (who built the failed replacement parts), insurance companies? Maybe taxpayers will be stuck with bailouts and cleanup costs?
Red October was fiction.
Managerial incompetence = Ignorance
Like the " State " idiots who sent THEIR plans to
Mitsubishi and then closed San Onofre due to
THEIR design flaws and blamed it on Mitsubishi...
A perfectly good generating plant that just needed
upgrades....Oh we can't afford the upgrades because
we have to attempt to fill that bottomless financial hole
in the California Pension Plans that are literally insolvent.
So they couple with the Climate Change/Global Warming/
Green Peace crowd and condemn the Nuclear Power Plant
on pure unadulterated Idiocy and Butt poor financial planning........
Go outside and " Blow " into the wind and help with Warren
and Sanders " Green New Deal " that will ruin the energy
sector for good............Go on " Blow " and contribute...
Bruddah IZ
DA
Thatʻs not economics
Bruddah IZ
DA
So is catastrophic global warming caused by CO2.
Bruddah IZ
DA
The truth is that the U.S. has 82 nuclear power plants on 72 submarines and 10 aircraft carriers without a single accident.
Thresher was lost after a reactor scram, according to the last few messages received. No one knows what happened to Scorpion, although the Navy has been able to determine when and where. NR-1 was built with only partial shielding around the reactor, restricting all personnel to the forward part of the vessel and requiring special handling and docking procedures in port. The SL-1 accident in Idaho killed all three operators present in the building at the time, although that was an Army reactor, not Navy.
Bruddah IZ
DA
CO2 is the more imminent danger. Is it not?
More imminent than what?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Share| Twitter|
November 4, 2019
Another scientist challenges Darwin's theory
By John Dale Dunn
Foresight: How the Chemistry of Life Reveals Planning and Purpose, by Marcos Eberlin 170 pp; softcover, $11.96; ISBN 13-978-1-936599-65-3 (Discovery Institute Press: Seattle); 2019
In the late 1960s, when I went to medical school, the histologists (cellular-level anatomists) had received a great new instrument, the electron microscope, that provided an order of magnitude's improvement on studying and recording the microanatomy of living cells. I still have on my shelf my electron microscopy book, published in 1966, a big picture and text book, Ultrastructural Aspects of Disease: The First Atlas of Fine Structure on Pathology, edited by King (1966) — 22 authors, 100 contributors, an amazing exposition on the ultrastructure of normal and pathological specialized cells of the human body, bone, liver, kidney, brain, muscle, heart, lung. You get the picture. The detail showed that cells of the body are not only diverse, but internally exceptionally complex — much more complex than anything man-made. It's complex anatomy supporting complex functionality.
Dr. Eberlin is involved in spectrometry. He studies the molecules that make up those really small things — one more level down into the make-up of cells, to the biochemical level of anatomy and the level at which atoms and molecules combine to make more complex molecules that have biochemical roles in the physiology of the cell. Is that a mouthful?
Eberlin studies complex chemical chain reactions facilitated by enzymes of amazing size and complexity, and the whole thing managed by the nucleus of the cell that has genetic material essential to manage all the cell's anatomy and physiological/chemical functionality to keep the cell alive and reproducing. Of course, if that cell were a part of a multicellular organism, the genetic material also determined the role of that cell in the larger organism.
As an example, membranes keep the cell intact but also allow nutrients and waste to go in and out, while protecting against toxins. Think of manufacturing and retail "just in time" inventory — a living cell is a "just in time" complex functional unit of life, directed by genetic material, DNA, that Bill Gates said "is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created."
Darwin knew little about cellular anatomical and physiological complexity. Certainly, he knew less about the multicelled and the higher forms of living things that display not only complex cellular functionality, but also incredible cellular diversity.
Dr. Eberlin writes in 172 pages of energetic prose about the artful solutions to major engineering, chemistry, and biology in living cells of living things that are evidence of a factor of foresight and intelligence.
Dr. Eberlin runs through a wonderful series of discussions that make his case for design and not chance (Darwin's theory is built on chance and random events):
- The complex functionality of membranes.
- The ideal components and proportions of the atmosphere.
- The genius make-up of genetic material, DNA and RNA.
- Gene controls — operons.
- The magic of enzymes — they are made to work.
- Chaparones and chaparonins that modify and maximize protein synthesis and benefits.
- The special activities and makeup of bugs, bacteria, and carnivorous plants.
- Birds and their sense of direction.
- The extraordinary nature of bird eggs and bird gestation.
- The special provisions that are essential for human reproduction.
- Special provision for sight.
The evolutionary theory of incrementalism that results in changes that are advantageous assumes too much. The chicken-egg question is an example of the circular causality question: if an advanced function is required, how does the organism get there? Do molecules know what they're doing? Do they know how to improve themselves?
It is magical thinking to propose that random genetic mutations or changes (Darwin knew nothing of genetics) occurring over eons are going to produce essential large complex molecules (Darwin knew nothing of molecules) that arrive at the right place and right time to interact with other large, complex just-right functional molecules when all the molecules have to have all their hundreds of amino acids in the right order and the proper right-left orientation (all amino acids are right or left) to produce functional advantages to survival for the organism.
There is no excuse for ignoring what is apparent, as the author points out: "This book has pointed out many clever mechanisms of life. But they are not merely clever. They are not just advantages. . . they are 'primordial musts,' features needed from the start for the organisms possessing them to survive and thrive. Think about it next time you hear some Darwinist waxing eloquent on how random variations can produce a complex functionality that cannot be duplicated by men."
My horses and dogs prove Darwin's theory a real stab in the dark—we are all, no doubt composed of mostly carbon compounds and water, but we are incredibly complex and yet functional, so it sure isn't something that happens by random chance and luck. No, tornadoes in a junk yard are not going to make a living thing. Such creations must have a really detailed, perfect plan, and then execute it. Even our smartest humans can't even know where to start. My dogs are perfect, so are my horses and also the deer in my pasture, the hummingbirds, the painted buntings -- the evidence of some really remarkable planning is everywhere. Who and how -- don't ask me -- I just know a well planned and executed project when it see it.
Wrong. What a surprise.
Bruddah IZ
DA
non-CO2 producing nuclear energy.
Circle.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Not really. 25 years after serving on the Nimitz and my glow is good. Actually I am right. Not a single accident on any of the 82 nuclear powered submarines or carriers. Your knowledge of the nuclear Navy just like your knowledge of finance. Inert.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Lol!