I have heard no denials anywhere about the “rumors” - only silence if anything on it not being true. When you have this many rumors swirling around from several different sources and no categorical denial then I have found it usually to be true.
I have heard no denials anywhere about the “rumors” - only silence if anything on it not being true. When you have this many rumors swirling around from several different sources and no categorical denial then I have found it usually to be true.
Yep, we got out early as well as soon as we found it to be a bad situationLet's not forget about parents who were promised their Sally would become "world-Class." I got out early but I have friends who have played three years and Sally is still the same player. Dad spent $30,000+.........for what?
Guess what else goes away if GDA goes away??? DPL! YES!So if girls DA goes away what will ElleJustus have to complain about? We might kill 2 birds with 1 stone.
I'm a Hawk, what kind of bird was GDA?So if girls DA goes away what will ElleJustus have to complain about? We might kill 2 birds with 1 stone.
Except that US Soccer is not likely self-insured. Depending on the policy, insurance could cover much of any settlement. Cone has said she wants to settle and move on. The lawsuit is about unequal pay for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are only women on the USWNT. Nothing re the lawsuit has anything to do with the youth teams etc. There are lawyers on this forum. They have made some valid arguments in favor of the federation's case. Public opinion may be with the women but don't be so sure that their legal footing is as firm as their pop culture appeal.The settlement is going to be big and cost US Soccer most of its reserves on top of needing to cut a hefty amount out of their budget. What a better way to do this than cut an unsuccessful program
Except that US Soccer is not likely self-insured. Depending on the policy, insurance could cover much of any settlement. Cone has said she wants to settle and move on. The lawsuit is about unequal pay for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are only women on the USWNT. Nothing re the lawsuit has anything to do with the youth teams etc. There are lawyers on this forum. They have made some valid arguments in favor of the federation's case. Public opinion may be with the women but don't be so sure that their legal footing is as firm as their pop culture appeal.
I just can't get past the following: why on earth would Kate Markgraf---recently hired by the federation and well respected by most--be announcing new DA club additions in middle March (after Cordeiro already resigned in February and Cone installed) if they know they are trashing the entire thing only 3 weeks later? Either the rumor is complete BS or Kate Markgraf is just a talking head without any meaningful purpose and this makes her look foolish or conniving. For now, I think the former (BS).
One of the tweets early on this thread said an announcement was forthcoming today. Obviously, that is wrong.
Except that US Soccer is not likely self-insured. Depending on the policy, insurance could cover much of any settlement. Cone has said she wants to settle and move on. The lawsuit is about unequal pay for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are only women on the USWNT. Nothing re the lawsuit has anything to do with the youth teams etc. There are lawyers on this forum. They have made some valid arguments in favor of the federation's case. Public opinion may be with the women but don't be so sure that their legal footing is as firm as their pop culture appeal.
I just can't get past the following: why on earth would Kate Markgraf---recently hired by the federation and well respected by most--be announcing new DA club additions in middle March (after Cordeiro already resigned in February and Cone installed) if they know they are trashing the entire thing only 3 weeks later? Either the rumor is complete BS or Kate Markgraf is just a talking head without any meaningful purpose and this makes her look foolish or conniving. For now, I think the former (BS).
One of the tweets early on this thread said an announcement was forthcoming today. Obviously, that is wrong.
If all this is true, maybe a Dodo.I'm a Hawk, what kind of bird was GDA?
I think the new CEO Wilson is at the root of this to a degree. He probably did all financial number upon being hired and said, 9 million for what? We are likely going to have to pay the WNT how much more? umm, yeah no DA and give us that 9 million every year. Ok, done.Except that US Soccer is not likely self-insured. Depending on the policy, insurance could cover much of any settlement. Cone has said she wants to settle and move on. The lawsuit is about unequal pay for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are only women on the USWNT. Nothing re the lawsuit has anything to do with the youth teams etc. There are lawyers on this forum. They have made some valid arguments in favor of the federation's case. Public opinion may be with the women but don't be so sure that their legal footing is as firm as their pop culture appeal.
I just can't get past the following: why on earth would Kate Markgraf---recently hired by the federation and well respected by most--be announcing new DA club additions in middle March (after Cordeiro already resigned in February and Cone installed) if they know they are trashing the entire thing only 3 weeks later? Either the rumor is complete BS or Kate Markgraf is just a talking head without any meaningful purpose and this makes her look foolish or conniving. For now, I think the former (BS).
One of the tweets early on this thread said an announcement was forthcoming today. Obviously, that is wrong.
Plus the COVID situation and not making much money this spring. That combined with 9m a year and lawsuits made this a easier decision I bet....assuming all true of courseI think the new CEO Wilson is at the root of this to a degree. He probably did all financial number upon being hired and said, 9 million for what? We are likely going to have to pay the WNT how much more? umm, yeah no DA and give us that 9 million every year. Ok, done.
I thought it was odd that ECNL hadn’t announced any new defections since Real Colorado & Texans on 3/11 and NC Courage & United on 3/23, because there are more.
Wondering if whatever new clubs are admitted after the DA folds will all be announced as a group?
Copa9 what was funny about this post?Yep, we got out early as well as soon as we found it to be a bad situation
Which clubs are you referring to?
It wouldn't surprise me if they leveraged DPL into the new "Socal DA". All those clubs aren't getting into ECNL.Guess what else goes away if GDA goes away??? DPL! YES!
Formal announcement should come next Wednesday, 4/15.Except that US Soccer is not likely self-insured. Depending on the policy, insurance could cover much of any settlement. Cone has said she wants to settle and move on. The lawsuit is about unequal pay for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are only women on the USWNT. Nothing re the lawsuit has anything to do with the youth teams etc. There are lawyers on this forum. They have made some valid arguments in favor of the federation's case. Public opinion may be with the women but don't be so sure that their legal footing is as firm as their pop culture appeal.
I just can't get past the following: why on earth would Kate Markgraf---recently hired by the federation and well respected by most--be announcing new DA club additions in middle March (after Cordeiro already resigned in February and Cone installed) if they know they are trashing the entire thing only 3 weeks later? Either the rumor is complete BS or Kate Markgraf is just a talking head without any meaningful purpose and this makes her look foolish or conniving. For now, I think the former (BS).
One of the tweets early on this thread said an announcement was forthcoming today. Obviously, that is wrong.
According to who?Ann
Formal announcement should come next Wednesday, 4/15.