Sandbagging Fall League Teams

That puts it into perspective, thanks. For everything above U10, refereeing one soccer game is a physically exhausting and mentally challenging endeavor if you are doing it correctly. Now we're being told that there's a bonanza out there where I can ref a mere 6 1/2 games per day, 5 days a week with no vacation year in, year out and earn $100K. I still get to pay for my own insurance, fuel (how far am I driving to find 6 1/2 games on the average Tuesday, for instance?) and wear and tear on my vehicle - and for all that glory, I STILL get to have lunatic parents scream at me while I'm doing my grueling-ass job. We ought to double the pay of refs and remorselessly enforce the new ref abuse policy. Only then would it be worth it economically. Until then, god bless the refs, because it is obvious that they are doing it solely for the benefit of the kids!
If you ever watched a solo CR game in SoCal league you would know it is probably the laziest job in the world. Also the potential for 100k is there. How many hours a referee wants to work, how efficient their travel to and from games is and what their eventual take home $$$ is, all depends on the individuals. As to lunatic parents yelling, that is also up to the referee on how they officiate they game. This is not to blame poor officiating, as people will always have their opinions, it is about learning how to filter noise and managing your crowd. I suggest you go to a league 1 or league 2 game in your england and see what abuse actually means. If you dont feel like travelling that far go to an NHL game and listen to the chants of ref you suck. Being able to distinguish between noise and actual hostility from the sidelines is a skill that most referee ignore to develop.
 
Every parent who has a kid playing youth soccer should be required to ref at least one game and play in at least one competitive game per year. Then those dumb parents might shut up once they see how it is being on the other side.
Those parents believe they are perfect so no matter what it wont change their perspective.
 
Every parent who has a kid playing youth soccer should be required to ref at least one game and play in at least one competitive game per year. Then those dumb parents might shut up once they see how it is being on the other side.
I would second that! And also... every coach who is coaching youth soccer sshould be required to ref at least ten games a year and play in at least one.
 
You are making a lot of assumptions here and naive comments. You dont count travel time in your hourly wage. If you are not smart enough to book games without having to travel that much then you ought to be making minimum wage. Yesterday in SoCal there was a scrimmage day setup by a club where it had 2 games for each of its 2015, 16 and 17s teams played on 2 fields. They hired 2 referees for the 6 games. They were paid 450 in cash for the afternoon. Both the referees were under 24 in age. They walked to the fields were the games were.

So yes you can do mathematical gymnastics and say the referees dont get paid well and that it is not a lot of money, but the fact remains they are still better paid than a lot of jobs and the only reason the mathematical gymnastics works is the referee isnt savvy enough to maximise there time in one place.

With reference to your health insurance jibe. Anyone working solely as a referee and getting their income in cash isnt reporting it. Which in CA qualifies them for Covered CA health insurance which is paid for by the rest of us who pay their taxes. So im sorry, that they not only get paid above $60 an hr if they are smart enough to work the system, they also get free to near free health care at the expense of others and then more often than not do a shoddy job of it because they physically arent capable of better.
so they got $150 per game??
 
I am not disagreeing on your sentiment here but as in any job doesnt the new person have to put in there time to make it up the ladder? I did 18 months of an unpaid internship and many people do more. The fact the new refs are getting paid and should be looked at as a positive. However, i 100% agree with you that the geriatrics who keep the cushy gigs shouldnt have that benefit. The games should be handed out on rotation and performance.

However, in my experience parents seems to rather yell and scream at the referee rather than file the correct paperwork to have the referees sanctioned.
There's a difference between "should" and "is". The "is" is the economics of it all. If you want more quality people, you gotta pay them. Otherwise you've now given the 60 year old who monopolizes the U10 solo center games the excuse to hold onto them...ref shortage. The u10 older guy should be supervising the youngers anyway. But that means drastically upping the $$$ that goes to the pool.

I got to act as my son's supervising ref for AYSO. It took me out of the CR rotation which the assigning ref was frustrated about but it was the trade off of losing my 1 U12/U14 game but having him cover 3 U10 games. Having someone there he can run to ask a question or to run thru the check in process for him has been invaluable (not to mention that can run interference with the parents and give him feedback afterwards). 7 games in and he's ready to fly solo. Every new ref should have that benefit. New centers should be cutting their teeth in U10/U9 games, not reserved for geriatrics who are looking to preserve their payouts. New ARs should be learning in U11/U10 games, not U14 games with teenagers.
 
so they got $150 per game??
450 for 6 games. That's $75 per game.

Games started at 915 and the referees were asked to get there by 9am. All games were wrapped up 1pm. Looking at that hourly they made just under $60 per hour, however a full lunch was also provided for the referees and coaches on the field.

Now if you compare that to a regular job, in california you are only guaranteed 2x 10 minute break if you are working a full 8 hr shift alongwith with an additional 30 minutes lunch break. These refs worked 3x 50 minute games, 2 hours and 30 minutes total but were on the field for 4 hours. Which equates to 36 minutes break for every hour they worked plus a free lunch.

So yes you can say they didnt make the $60 per hour i claimed earlier or you could also say they made $90 per hour they actually worked.
 
There's a difference between "should" and "is". The "is" is the economics of it all. If you want more quality people, you gotta pay them. Otherwise you've now given the 60 year old who monopolizes the U10 solo center games the excuse to hold onto them...ref shortage. The u10 older guy should be supervising the youngers anyway. But that means drastically upping the $$$ that goes to the pool.
If you want more quality people you have to start by setting a standard and holding those in place accountable. The economics of it would actually trend the other way and reduce the hourly. If the individuals couldnt monopolise the easy games and they were given out to the youth referees trying to cut the mustard there would be more opportunity and better officiating overall. Currently there are no expected standards because they are so low and parents/coaches/players would right yell at the ref than follow the tedious process of making sure the referees get the adequate training/sanction/termination (i am pretty sure you read the other ref thread). Until the sideline puts in the effort to force the change the right way the league/ref assigning body have no reason to change.
I got to act as my son's supervising ref for AYSO. It took me out of the CR rotation which the assigning ref was frustrated about but it was the trade off of losing my 1 U12/U14 game but having him cover 3 U10 games. Having someone there he can run to ask a question or to run thru the check in process for him has been invaluable (not to mention that can run interference with the parents and give him feedback afterwards). 7 games in and he's ready to fly solo. Every new ref should have that benefit. New centers should be cutting their teeth in U10/U9 games, not reserved for geriatrics who are looking to preserve their payouts. New ARs should be learning in U11/U10 games, not U14 games with teenagers.

i have to say though i applaud your dedication to your son and making sure that he is both getting the direction as well as support he needs to grow in the sport. I dont know if i completely agree with your breakdown on the age groups and where to break in new refs. I can say that you can tell you have given it a fair amount of thought and in your case have a working scenario with your son to support as well. I believe i would rather have all referees looking to become a CR have completed at least 15 to 20 games as an AR if not more and then based on their performance and understanding of that position move to be given the opportunity to CR. Once that is done i believe new CRs should be starting out in u10/11 before moving to younger. The u10/11 parents have been around the block a bit and are less prone to out burst because little johhny fell down and the only one they can vent at is the ref. Also most leagues games dont have ARs until u13 when the games go 11 a side. ayso is different in that regard but not SoCal soccer league. i cannot personally comment a lot on the ayso ref system as my interaction/involvement with it has been minimal. I was unable to justify refereeing ayso in our region as i fundamentally disagreed with the head ref's directives and approach to how to referee the game.
 
Every parent who has a kid playing youth soccer should be required to ref at least one game and play in at least one competitive game per year. Then those dumb parents might shut up once they see how it is being on the other side.
Our little league (baseball) started doing this. While it hasn't wiped out the bad behavior, it has shifted things in the right direction. Overall, there's a better appreciation of what it's like to be on the other side of the fence.

Another option short of requiring folks to be a ref is to require parents to sit behind other parents at a game your kid isn't playing in. When you don't have a dog in the fight, its more eye-opening how some crazy parents can get.
 
You are making a lot of assumptions here and naive comments. You dont count travel time in your hourly wage. If you are not smart enough to book games without having to travel that much then you ought to be making minimum wage. Yesterday in SoCal there was a scrimmage day setup by a club where it had 2 games for each of its 2015, 16 and 17s teams played on 2 fields. They hired 2 referees for the 6 games. They were paid 450 in cash for the afternoon. Both the referees were under 24 in age. They walked to the fields were the games were.

So yes you can do mathematical gymnastics and say the referees dont get paid well and that it is not a lot of money, but the fact remains they are still better paid than a lot of jobs and the only reason the mathematical gymnastics works is the referee isnt savvy enough to maximise there time in one place.

With reference to your health insurance jibe. Anyone working solely as a referee and getting their income in cash isnt reporting it. Which in CA qualifies them for Covered CA health insurance which is paid for by the rest of us who pay their taxes. So im sorry, that they not only get paid above $60 an hr if they are smart enough to work the system, they also get free to near free health care at the expense of others and then more often than not do a shoddy job of it because they physically arent capable of better.

I invite you to check this out ...


It's a small sample size but nobody in the thread has reffing income anywhere near what you claim.

Is that because they aren't smart enough? Or because this isn't as lucrative as you think it is? Your supposed potential of $100K / year just isn't reality.
 
I invite you to check this out ...


It's a small sample size but nobody in the thread has reffing income anywhere near what you claim.

Is that because they aren't smart enough? Or because this isn't as lucrative as you think it is? Your supposed potential of $100K / year just isn't reality.
I appreciate the share and i am part of the reddit group. I invite you to look closely at the locations of the people that are sharing. Additionally the 100k potential is also based on working full time. Most of the individuals posting on that reddit are ones working as seasonal, part time and or hobbyist referees.

My posts and my numbers have repeatedly stated they are in reference to the group this forum is about - SoCal Soccer. I can quote ref fees from BFE where they make a dollar and buggar all for a 90 minute game but that DOESNT change what referees are being paid and making in Southern California, especially in the the Orange County area.

I also invite you to look at the below attached picture:
1760388258386.png

I underlined in red the area that i am talking about. Hopefully that helps clarify the potential. If you are going to come back to say ref's arent paid well, please share some actual facts or even anecdotes about the SoCal Soccer scene otherwise you point is moot. A no dont quote AYSO referees as its a volunteer position.

Furthermore, here are some facts from the reddit group you shared:

1760388516993.png
He is making 85 dollars a game and 10k a year working only December and Febraury. I can post the whole conversation if you have trouble finding it.

Here is another one working 2 season and less than 8 hours a week that makes 10k to 15k a year.
1760388723559.png

I can keep posting these all day long.

Hopefully, this helps you understand the difference between full time and part time work, along with the difference in ability to make (potential) X sum of money if you work full time vs part time.
 
If you want more quality people you have to start by setting a standard and holding those in place accountable. The economics of it would actually trend the other way and reduce the hourly. If the individuals couldnt monopolise the easy games and they were given out to the youth referees trying to cut the mustard there would be more opportunity and better officiating overall. Currently there are no expected standards because they are so low and parents/coaches/players would right yell at the ref than follow the tedious process of making sure the referees get the adequate training/sanction/termination (i am pretty sure you read the other ref thread). Until the sideline puts in the effort to force the change the right way the league/ref assigning body have no reason to change.


i have to say though i applaud your dedication to your son and making sure that he is both getting the direction as well as support he needs to grow in the sport. I dont know if i completely agree with your breakdown on the age groups and where to break in new refs. I can say that you can tell you have given it a fair amount of thought and in your case have a working scenario with your son to support as well. I believe i would rather have all referees looking to become a CR have completed at least 15 to 20 games as an AR if not more and then based on their performance and understanding of that position move to be given the opportunity to CR. Once that is done i believe new CRs should be starting out in u10/11 before moving to younger. The u10/11 parents have been around the block a bit and are less prone to out burst because little johhny fell down and the only one they can vent at is the ref. Also most leagues games dont have ARs until u13 when the games go 11 a side. ayso is different in that regard but not SoCal soccer league. i cannot personally comment a lot on the ayso ref system as my interaction/involvement with it has been minimal. I was unable to justify refereeing ayso in our region as i fundamentally disagreed with the head ref's directives and approach to how to referee the game.
He had completed 20 games as an AR. AYSO switched to allowing parents to AR their own non-championship games (each side can put forward an AR) under a neutral ref. Those parents have priority (so they can watch the kids play and have child care as a result instead of having to have their kids sit while they handle a game before/after). It's been VERY successful in getting parents to sign up (we don't have any begging for AR problems). We CRs rather have a parent who has gone through the training and a few games than a club linesman, and if they are partisan or we have problems they'll be told they can't use the privilege anymore and have to do their games elsewhere. So he was sort of forced into the CR role (even though he didn't want to do it) because that was the only way for him to get his hours since the AYSO parents have priority for those AR slots. Edited to add: best part of supervising has been I can supervise new ARs too by standing behind them and assisting with their questions so the AR benefits as well.

It's ridiculous that those younger than u13 don't have ARs. To start an AR at U13 is asking for trouble. They need to cut their teeth at U10 (where the build out line is in place) and then move up. We were told it was due (even before COVID) due to the referee shortage. But your information seems to indicate it's not just that-- it's some individuals jealously guarding their perogative to the heftier youngers fees they don't have to share for less running. That's just not right, but as always with youth soccer, the kid players are usually at the bottom of the priority list, after the clubs, Docs, coaches, referees, and parents.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top