kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
Agreed. I was only referring to the "gain" economically vs. the loss in life that they may have been able to mitigate by shutting down. My point was that if we get a second wave this fall, all these "numbers" change again. I hope not, but it appears to be the common belief that there will be some sort of 2nd wave of the virus this fall.The point isn't if it's good for Sweden or not. The relevant point is that the waves all eventually expire. The question of the second wave is an open one because we don't know why the waves are expiring on their own (regardless of what governments do, severity of lockdown etc). Some scientists have argued its because of cross coronavirus immunity or T cell immunity. Some scientist have argued the virus has mutated. We just don't know why, but we do know it is happening. The only region so far though that's had a high second wave after having a high first one is Iran, but their data has is unreliable as is their testing so we just don't really know.
You were spot on with the "slow burn" in California when you posted back in May. I can't say I read anything anywhere else predicting that. Maybe it was out there, but I didn't see it. Well done.