Great question.
I defer to the folks who make a living figuring out those matters...
There appears to be lots of information on line regarding watershed locations from the Tijuana River through Ventura County.
Enjoy!
Sierra and coastal range foothills, mostly. It’s also possible to use early spring runoff to do groundwater recharge.Where would one build a reservoir to capture that rainwater runoff?
I'm going up to Mount Shasta with the family to celebrate Mothers Day later this week. I hear the lake is real low. I'll takes some pics and report back.CA has not done any major work on its reservoirs (by that I mean adding any real capacity) since the 1960s when the state had half the population it currently does.
It needs to build more. And I suspect that if that doesn't work or they don't do it in a timely fashion, they will move to desalination. The state is still growing and the demand for water will increase.
My question was addressed to the proposal to capture rainwater in urban Southern California. Dams in the mountains won't help with that.Sierra and coastal range foothills, mostly. It’s also possible to use early spring runoff to do groundwater recharge.
We used to store our summer water as snowpack. With climate change, that isn’t an option anymore. If we want to use the same water as before, we have to find another place to store it.
Not cost free. Building dams has serious impacts on fisheries. But you have to weigh that against the fuel use and brine discharge of desalination plants. Those aren’t cost free either.
That is a bandaid solution. The population will continue to grow. CA and other western states need to start working on actual plans to keep/store more water.My question was addressed to the proposal to capture rainwater in urban Southern California. Dams in the mountains won't help with that.
The obvious solution to me is to reduce consumption. As a first step, restrict outdoor watering of anything but food sources unless using water reclaimed from wastewater or from private wells on the property where it is being consumed. That allows public parks and golf courses to keep green while sacrificing suburban ego lawns.
That is a bandaid solution. The population will continue to grow. CA and other western states need to start working on actual plans to keep/store more water.
Well, I guess that desalination plants or perhaps floating icebergs down here are are only options...or come up with "new technology"??This is already being done to the limits of the available technology. Read this and get back to us --
Amazon.com
www.amazon.com
Population control technology....?"Start working"? You don't think that they aren't already doing that.
You hit on a key metric there -- population growth. Try solving that first; it would be more effective than building empty reservoirs.
Well, I guess that desalination plants or perhaps floating icebergs down here are are only options...or come up with "new technology"??
Collecting billions of gallons of water going into the Pacific should be a top priority here in SoCal.
Mathematical/biological fact -- if every woman limited herself to producing no more than one female child, the population growth puzzle would be solved in one generation.Population control technology....?
When one does any preliminary research one finds multiple references to expanding current reservoirs (many were expanded a decade ago) and of course there is this: https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/big-california-reservoir-track-22b-federal-loan-83507679"Start working"? You don't think that they aren't already doing that.
You hit on a key metric there -- population growth. Try solving that first; it would be more effective than building empty reservoirs.
When one does any preliminary research one finds multiple references to expanding current reservoirs (many were expanded a decade ago) and of course there is this: https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/big-california-reservoir-track-22b-federal-loan-83507679
Then of course there is the depletion of ground water.
Rainy years can’t make up for California’s groundwater use
And without additional restrictions, they may not recover for several decades.arstechnica.com
We could call that the China Syndrome and enforce it with more abortions...Mathematical/biological fact -- if every woman limited herself to producing no more than one female child, the population growth puzzle would be solved in one generation.
We could call that the China Syndrome and enforce it with more abortions...
Okay...In America, we enforce such restrictions with taxes.
While I'm not proposing it, population control is the only "Green New Deal" that will have a substantial impact on our "carbon footprint". Most other proposed strategies are simply virtue signaling. We can be successful at improving water and air quality, but not much else with the environment if the population continues to grow.Mathematical/biological fact -- if every woman limited herself to producing no more than one female child, the population growth puzzle would be solved in one generation.
Our dear Brother Gates wants to drop population by 15% and control the population all at the same time.While I'm not proposing it, population control is the only "Green New Deal" that will have a substantial impact on our "carbon footprint". Most other proposed strategies are simply virtue signaling. We can be successful at improving water and air quality, but not much else with the environment if the population continues to grow.
We could learn to live a less wasteful existence? Lol! “Not in ‘murica!”While I'm not proposing it, population control is the only "Green New Deal" that will have a substantial impact on our "carbon footprint". Most other proposed strategies are simply virtue signaling. We can be successful at improving water and air quality, but not much else with the environment if the population continues to grow.
bullshit. we reward welfare recipients more money for more children.In America, we enforce such restrictions with taxes.