I know many gun owners and they are very aware of their rights and the second amendment.Not of topic as we are discussing if the constitution should be taken literally or not.
How do you think our California Militia can take on the US Army without these weapons? Remember, the 2nd amendment purpose is so that our state militia can take on the Federal government if there was ever a need.
Recap. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,.......
It appalls me that nowadays people are thinking of exercising the 2nd amendment in order to hunt....no, it was way bigger than that when it was first thought up.
I know many hunters and can think of none who have mentioned the right to bear arms and hunting in the same sentence,
You seem to be the one talking about if the Constitution should be taken literally....
I'll let SCOTUS, whether I agree or not, determine the constitutionality of federal laws.