Yes, it's a culture that statistically understands the consequences of "negligence, absent mindedness, mistakes, and freak circumstances" when it comes to gun safety.
Statistics has nothing to do with it.
Yes, it's a culture that statistically understands the consequences of "negligence, absent mindedness, mistakes, and freak circumstances" when it comes to gun safety.
Easy killer. I like finding disclaimers in your own links after making such strong statements about correlation being causation in regard to gun availability and gun deaths.The funny thing is BIZ, I don't even think you believe your BS, you just like to argue.
Please continue. Wez just posted a 20 year old study chocked full of stats.Statistics has nothing to do with it.
Please continue. Wez just posted a 20 year old study chocked full of stats.
Easy killer. I like finding disclaimers in your own links after making such strong statements about correlation being causation in regard to gun availability and gun deaths.
All accidental deaths are tragic.
Skin cancer is worth worrying about
Accidental shootings are not.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/americas-top-killing-machine/384440/
"Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year."
Statistics prove you wrong Lion.
Which states are non-hunter states?Hunter states have an entirely different gun culture than non-hunter states.
Example - my father said to me in a discussion on magazine size - "If you can't kill it in 3 shots you shouldn't be in the woods."
Right . . .Poopycock!
I'm talking about accidental guns deaths .
ACCIDENTAL ....
And I'm sure the culture generated those stats. Please go on.I was discussing the cultural differences.
At least I support my claims with your evidence.At least I support my claims with evidence.
Hana Ho!Happy one month anniversary to me on the new Forum