Ponderable

You better watch your mouth, because inevitably it’s going to be a person of color taking care of your ass as you get older. I dare you to talk crap to the nurse or hospital team when you’re in a time of need.
Ha, they won't even be able to understand me by then.
Do you know what a Red Chicom even is?
 
Sorry brother but if you support Sheriff Joe accepting his pardon, you lose your anti rule of law card.

Let’s see tough guy, if we deport all of the criminal aliens, and just for arguments sake let’s say there’s 1 million, would you be ok with givin legal status to the remaining 10 million?
He was found in contempt of court...a misdemeanor...
Those who enter the country illegally are also guilty of a misdemeanor the first time.
If someone does it again after being deported it's considered a felony.....what is it, when one supports illegal entry into our country?
 
Muslims

ann-coulter-flickr-13.jpg

Gage Skidmore/Flickr
JOHN BINDER 13 Sep 2018


New York Times best-selling author and populist conservative columnist Ann Coulter says President Trump should be implementing an immigration moratorium 17 years after the September 11, 2001, Islamic terrorist attacks where foreign terrorists flew planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

In an interview with SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, Coulter asked, “What’s it going to take?” for the U.S. to temporarily halt immigration to the country.

“I mean, what’s it going to take? Even 17 years of celebrating diversity day and we’re admitting, as I know from Breitbart, admitting more Muslims from the countries where the 9/11 hijackers came from, than we were before 9/11,” Coulter said. “What kind of country does this?”

Coulter said Trump should stick to his “America First” plan on immigration, as that was the central issue of the 2016 presidential election and continues to be the key focus of GOP midterm voters.

“So build the wall, [implement a] nice little immigration moratorium and I think things will be fine,” Coulter said.
 
Crazy,



Add This to the Questions We Need Answered About Botham Jean’s Killing

Posted at 8:14 pm on September 13, 2018 by Sarah Rumpf


When Botham Jean was shot and killed inside his apartment by Dallas Police Office Amber Guyger on September 7, it sparked national outrage — and rightfully so. Guyger’s defense that she accidentally entered the wrong apartment and Jean failed to follow her verbal commands is a woefully inadequate justification for using deadly force. It took several days to charge Guyger with manslaughter, and many have questioned whether the Dallas Police Department is going too far to protect one of their own officers.





Tonight, new developing news gives additional weight to that question. A story posted by the Dallas Fox affiliate announced, “DEVELOPING: Search warrant: Marijuana found in Botham Jean’s apartment after deadly shooting.”


As the story notes, several search warrants were signed by judges and executed a few hours after the shooting:

The search warrant executed in Jean’s apartment at South Side Flats specifically sought fired cartridge casings, fired projectiles, firearms, ballistic vests, keys, evidence of blood, video surveillance systems, and contraband such as narcotics and other items used in criminal offenses.

The inventory return yielded:
2 fired cartridge casings
1 laptop computer
1 black backpack with police equipment and paperwork
1 insulated lunch box
1 black ballistic vest with “police” markings
10.4 grams of marijuana in ziplock bags
1 metal marijuana grinder
2 RFID keys
2 used packages of medical aid

Let’s be very, very clear about something: whether or not Jean was using or possessing drugs is not relevant under the facts of this case as we currently know them. Guyger’s defense is that she went into the wrong apartment, thinking it was hers, not that she believed there was some sort of crime or dangerous situation happening inside Jean’s apartment and she needed to intervene.

So why was the warrant issued to include searching for drugs? Collecting the fired cartridge casings and other evidence directly related to the shooting makes sense. Investigating the personal life of a victim — who, again, Guyger has made no claims was doing anything illegal or dangerous to justify her entering his apartment — seems not just irrelevant, but potentially an attempt to distract or smear his reputation.
 
He was found in contempt of court...a misdemeanor...
Those who enter the country illegally are also guilty of a misdemeanor the first time.
If someone does it again after being deported it's considered a felony.....what is it, when one supports illegal entry into our country?
Melania?
 
The Dems have lost their collective minds over the SCOTUS nominee. Senator Feinstein claims to have a letter from someone who was told something about Brett Kavanaugh. Maybe E was was right. The left now believes hearsay to be fact. I would embarrassed to call myself a Democrat today or fpr that matter any other day.


Let the parade of clowns continue...
 
The Dems have lost their collective minds over the SCOTUS nominee. Senator Feinstein claims to have a letter from someone who was told something about Brett Kavanaugh. Maybe E was was right. The left now believes hearsay to be fact. I would embarrassed to call myself a Democrat today or fpr that matter any other day.


Let the parade of clowns continue...
They are just playing to their crazy base for the midterms and 2020.
Trying to our crazy each other.
Now that's embarrassing.
 
Back
Top