Still trying to get an answer from you.
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
Still trying to get an answer from you.
"Rooted in fact but presented inaccurately"is how your cite described the article...
You took that and turned it into "sucker".
Typical priggish commentary from you e, thanks for being consistently arrogant.
You apparently did the same thing with the set of facts mentioned in this article:
https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/blacks-civil-war
How does the Russian Government spy on every foreigner as you claim? Do tell.
Multi Sport
DA
Multi Sport
DA
Espola probably thinks they use Badgers..
Asked and answered.
The totalitarian Communist Soviet Union had it down decades ago - every movement by foreign visitors was noted, and they endeavored to record every hotel stay, every meal, everyone they met with, every ruble spent.
They don't claim to be Communists any more, but they are still totalitarians, and now they have all the computers they want to help out with keeping track of the details.
Consistently truthful.
Don't need to follow when I am a step ahead.
What kind of dirt do you think they have on Bernie sanders?
He spent his honeymoon in the Soviet Union.
Im not going to be the one to say it but,
people may laughing at you, and might be laughing at you for the rest of your life.
Just something I heard, so I thought id give you a heads up.
I'm watching History of Comedy on CNN right now, so I'm not offended.
They only have dirt if he did something dirty (other than the usual honeymoon stuff, of course).
Fake News.
Multi Sport
DA
Oh look! How cute! You're trying.. you're failing but at least you're trying.
Please continue...
Oh, and please feel free to back up your post that Russia spies on all foreigners.
Not reading the thread? (Or is it the other thread?)
Where?
Articles that you missed have been reprinted for you...please do the same.
Arrogantly delusional.
Sacramento Democrats hosing SoCal...
California's bullet train is 11 years behind schedule. Lawmakers want to know when L.A. will benefit from it
Rep. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) broached the topic at a House rail subcommittee hearing on Thursday, asking state rail officials and other witnesses how he can justify the project to his constituents.
“What do I tell people in Los Angeles,” said Lowenthal, the former chairman of the state Senate transportation committee. “We talk about the [rail’s benefits] to Silicon Valley and the Central Valley, but … when are we going to see things going on in Los Angeles? We are the population center.”....
...The hearing was called by Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Turlock), chairman of the House rail subcommittee and an early supporter of the project as a state senator.
In opening remarks at the Sacramento hearing, Denham said the project was based on “confusing business plans that are not grounded in reality” and that it was becoming “a poster child for mismanagement.”
Denham noted that in 2008, the $33 billion price tag included track that would reach from Sacramento to San Diego by 2020, whereas now the project aims to connect San Francisco to Los Angeles by 2033. What voters approved in 2008 “is unrecognizable today,” he said.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-high-speed-rail-hearing-20180810-story.html
California's bullet train is 11 years behind schedule. Lawmakers want to know when L.A. will benefit from it
Rep. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) broached the topic at a House rail subcommittee hearing on Thursday, asking state rail officials and other witnesses how he can justify the project to his constituents.
“What do I tell people in Los Angeles,” said Lowenthal, the former chairman of the state Senate transportation committee. “We talk about the [rail’s benefits] to Silicon Valley and the Central Valley, but … when are we going to see things going on in Los Angeles? We are the population center.”....
...The hearing was called by Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Turlock), chairman of the House rail subcommittee and an early supporter of the project as a state senator.
In opening remarks at the Sacramento hearing, Denham said the project was based on “confusing business plans that are not grounded in reality” and that it was becoming “a poster child for mismanagement.”
Denham noted that in 2008, the $33 billion price tag included track that would reach from Sacramento to San Diego by 2020, whereas now the project aims to connect San Francisco to Los Angeles by 2033. What voters approved in 2008 “is unrecognizable today,” he said.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-high-speed-rail-hearing-20180810-story.html
Do tell Comrade Magoo...