Hüsker Dü
DA
Anyone with a lick of sense and reasoning scares you . . . and anything that rings true you label fake in an attempt to quash it. You aren't fooling anyone.
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
Sheriff Joe
DA
You get what you pay for.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Funny coming from the ignoring queen.
I think the agreements were legal.If Enquirer promised to publish and then buried it, that may have been a breach.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Lots of fake attorneys around here.
No way. Just me. What do you pretend to do for a living, Joe? Do you leave your house, even though there may be an “illegal” looking to harm you or take your job around every corner? Boo!
Sheriff Joe
DA
I am independently wealthy and it might be a bad decision for an illegal to try and harm me.
NDA and CA are basically one and the same.
The agreement and money are common place.
Congratulations on negotiating agreements for a living.
Contractors negotiate agreements for services rendered almost daily. So?
So my view of confidentiality agreements and this being hush money wrapped up in a confidentiality agreement holds more sway than yours. Although the new Republican thinking is that Americans get to be stupid and opinions from anybody are as valid as opinions from experts, so you keep deciding about Trump’s agreements and I will decide the most durable carpeting.
Trumps agreements?
NDA's & CA's are made daily...doesn't matter if it's Trump, which seemingly is your only bitch.
Good luck with your carpet...
Let’s be clear.
It was hush money for sex.
It was handled through intermediaries so he could continue to deny it, as he still does.
I understand you’re fine with him doing that and lying about it.
Sounds like maybe you’re an evangelical.
So it was hush money.
Does that make the agreement null and void or illegal?
You don't understand shit counselor. I'm not fine with it.The left let Clinton skate and he lied under oath.
The left are the ones that said, but it was only about sex. The left forgave him.
I am Christian but I'm no evangelical.
Sounds like your a typical hypocritical two faced progressive....counselor...
Stick with carpet decisions.
Bruddah IZ
DA
I quoted you.
Clinton was impeached and had his law license stripped, correct? What has happened to Trump, exactly? So what’s your point...(besides being a “Christian” who endorses hush money paid for adulterous relationships and then lying about it, of course...unless that is your point)? I already said it’s legal. Paying someone to have sex with you is illegal but paying someone to keep quiet about sex isn’t.
But this I think brings us to the interesting part... because now two women have gone public despite signing contracts that basically said they would not.
So what happens now? Before becoming president Trump could use his money to threaten them with a stream of unending lawsuits that would bankrupt the women- but of course now that he's president such a move will open the floodgates of both donations to the women's legal defense fund, and also a floodgate of old flings getting called into court to testify under oath about the sex he's paid them to keep quiet about.
Oy vey. I just don't see any good moves for Trump to easily make all the scandal go away. This is going to be front page news for the next two years of his presidency.
I can see lawyers in the future including clauses in contracts for their clients that would expire in a certain time if the publisher doesn't publish.
Happens all the time already. She must have known they were going to bury it, is my guess. That was the deal. Trump gets the Enquirer to call it "life story rights," which is more subtle than the hush money deal with the porn star, and they pay her and bury the story.
"I've known Stormy Daniels a long time, and I'll be honest, she may have mentioned some of this stuff around 10 years ago," Rogen said. "At the time, when you ask a porn star who they've been sleeping with and the answer was Donald Trump, it was like the least surprising thing that she could've said."
Trump didn't lie under oath....Trump hasn't ignored a court order...
Clinton was impeached for both of the above, but he wasn't removed from office.
He wasn't removed from office because the Senate didn't thing lying about sex was reason enough to remove him from office.
Trump hasn't been placed under oath, much less interviewed by special council.
Seems to me you're putting the horse before the cart counselor...
Nope I’m not. Sounds like we agree on the facts, at least. But I do think you have the expression backwards.
