Andy Dukes
PREMIER
Intent, lying afterwards, the how and why. All of those things matter per Director Comey's testimony under oath.What's "not enough" mean?
Intent, lying afterwards, the how and why. All of those things matter per Director Comey's testimony under oath.What's "not enough" mean?
Same could be said for BHO and every President before him.He also seemed enjoying flesh that had a bit more color to it. I doubt I know anyone who has not said a racist thing. I also bet I have never voted for a politician that was not a liar.
We had that figured out for weeks.Whew, glad we cleared that up. So all that is left is facts and the law.
I never said otherwise.Same could be said for BHO and every President before him.
Right, the video covered intent, lying afterwards, how and why has strict rules for handling. Using an unsecured server is not a part of how you handle top secret documents.Intent, lying afterwards, the how and why. All of those things matter per Director Comey's testimony under oath.
I thought we did.We had that figured out for weeks.
Don't put too much emphasis on his political speech. Listen to his testimony. It is much clearer.O
Right, the video covered intent, lying afterwards, how and why has strict rules for handling. Using an unsecured server is not a part of how you handle top secret documents.
Yes it is. Makes a nice case for prosecution. No emphasis on other then the facts and the law.Don't put too much emphasis on his political speech. Listen to his testimony. It is much clearer.
You only came up with one?
LOL.
I know there's more than one, sherlock.Yea, from Breitbart, a site that gives a voice to white Supremacy. You know, the one run by Stephen Bannon, Trump's new campaign manager.
But it doesn't matter what I post, evidence is lost on you. If you don't feel like calling someone a racist, they're magically not one.
That you, like Comey, choose not to act on what you see.
That is an entertaining thought. Trump becomes President, Giuliani becomes AG and decides to go against his FBI Director Comey to prosecute the retired HRC. That would be entertaining.Comey interpreted the law as he thinks it should apply.
Other learned people interpret the statute differently.
Courts do this daily when they interpret & rule on laws and on appeal are many times reversed.
Hillary was lucky that Comey is the head of the FBI & that the AG is part of BHO administration.
Perhaps the next administration will interpret the law differently, & prosecute HRC for the perjuring felon she is.
Why?Has everybody seen '13 Hours' ?
If you haven't you should.
It seems to me that those who see racism everywhere
Has everybody seen '13 Hours' ?
If you haven't you should.
Why?
Why would Giuliani be going against Comey?That is an entertaining thought. Trump becomes President, Giuliani becomes AG and decides to go against his FBI Director Comey to prosecute the retired HRC. That would be entertaining.
Why?
Is it accurate? That depends who you ask. What was wrong with the current security budget?I'll bite too, why? Is it an accurate depiction of the events? Does it shine light on the fact that Republicans voted against increasing the State Dept. security budget?
As opposed to the trusted source, SOS Clinton.It must all be true - he learned that from his trusted sources on the web.