Andy Dukes
PREMIER
Every poll I saw had him losing. Without looking at them, I bet most if not all the major polls were within the margin of error.By design.
Every poll I saw had him losing. Without looking at them, I bet most if not all the major polls were within the margin of error.By design.
I guess the 20 million the Repubs spent was money well spent.When a loss is considered a win by the losers....
SANDY SPRINGS, Ga. - Democrats spent more than $30 million but still came up short in Georgia's runoff election Tuesday, marking the fourth consecutive special election where a Democratic candidate fell short of winning a Republican-leaning seat.
With the political world watching Georgia, some Democratic strategists say the party failed to manage expectations ahead of a red-district race where a close margin for a losing Democratic candidate should have been celebrated as a win of its own.
entire article:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...eorgia-defeat/ar-BBD1ELM?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp
The Democrats don't believe that for a second....I guess the 20 million the Repubs spent was money well spent.
The dems don't believe what for a second?The Democrats don't believe that for a second....
How much money came from California in this election in Georgia?
"I guess the 20 million the Repubs spent was money well spent."The dems don't believe what for a second?
I bet the Dems believe it was well spent since it helped hold the seat for the Repubs."I guess the 20 million the Repubs spent was money well spent."
When did you look at them?Every poll I saw had him losing. Without looking at them, I bet most if not all the major polls were within the margin of error.
I was watching MSNBC and WP. I just remember them with him behind by 1% or so.When did you look at them?
Ossoff was leading according to some polls, then as the election neared, they tightened, and it became "too close to call" the day before the election.
It's not like you not to look, unless of course you are afraid of what you might find.Every poll I saw had him losing. Without looking at them, I bet most if not all the major polls were within the margin of error.
I would have to care to look. I don't live in Georgia. This is a red district in a red state. Again, if the Dems want to win, they have to be better than the Repubs. They are not in most of the important ways.It's not like you not to look, unless of course you are afraid of what you might find.
It's easy to google, remember?
I watched MSNBC last night for an our and then again this morning, no wonder you people are the way you are, talk about demented. That network is far more left than Fox News and Breitbart are right.I was watching MSNBC and WP. I just remember them with him behind by 1% or so.
Sure it is.I watched MSNBC last night for an our and then again this morning, no wonder you people are the way you are, talk about demented. That network is far more left than Fox News and Breitbart are right.
Proof that the dems have a spending problem despite the polls you say you saw.Every poll I saw had him losing. Without looking at them, I bet most if not all the major polls were within the margin of error.
If you don't care, why post on it?I would have to care to look. I don't live in Georgia. This is a red district in a red state. Again, if the Dems want to win, they have to be better than the Repubs. They are not in most of the important ways.
Not a bad guess.I guess the 20 million the Repubs spent was money well spent.
I watched 2 hours of MSNBC and it's just a big Trump blanket party. At least on Fox they bring some lefty nuts in to defend themselves.Sure it is.