OMG

My technique? We're talking about your idiotic, liberal hypocrisy. "Hey, we know Creepy Joe did it as VP and he wants to be the man, now, but Trump doing this IS JUST OUTRAGEOUS!"
You just don't know about how things work, so you listen to t for advice eh? Let that sink in.
 
My technique? We're talking about your idiotic, liberal hypocrisy. "Hey, we know Creepy Joe did it as VP and he wants to be the man, now, but Trump doing this IS JUST OUTRAGEOUS!"
Joe went after a corrupt prosecutor (who everyone acknowledged was corrupt who was not investigating his son, no matter how many times you lie and say he was).
The President went after his main opponent in the next election by asking a foreign government to help us.
But why not? The Russians had helped him last time...as we know.
I get that these facts are confusing to you, so it becomes one big jumble.
Trump is very successful that way, too.
Yes, these are techniques, as I said.
 
Joe went after a corrupt prosecutor (who everyone acknowledged was corrupt who was not investigating his son, no matter how many times you lie and say he was).
The President went after his main opponent in the next election by asking a foreign government to help us.
But why not? The Russians had helped him last time...as we know.
I get that these facts are confusing to you, so it becomes one big jumble.
Trump is very successful that way, too.
Yes, these are techniques, as I said.
The unknowing don't know what they don't know and that's exactly what those that would hope to influence them count on.
 
Joe went after a corrupt prosecutor (who everyone acknowledged was corrupt who was not investigating his son, no matter how many times you lie and say he was).
The President went after his main opponent in the next election by asking a foreign government to help us.
But why not? The Russians had helped him last time...as we know.
I get that these facts are confusing to you, so it becomes one big jumble.
Trump is very successful that way, too.
Yes, these are techniques, as I said.

Russian didn't vote for trump. They did reveal how corrupt the DNC was, staging protests with paid interns, giving Hillary the questions ahead of time during for an upcoming debate, then hiring the DNC chair for her campaign. If Russians helped trump by making the DNC more transparent, that's helping the common voter.
 
Russian didn't vote for trump. They did reveal how corrupt the DNC was, staging protests with paid interns, giving Hillary the questions ahead of time during for an upcoming debate, then hiring the DNC chair for her campaign. If Russians helped trump by making the DNC more transparent, that's helping the common voter.
Nice selective view on the world you have there. What of the bots pumping out false information that either changed votes or helped suppress them? Record low turnouts in the 3 key states won by less than 80,000 votes combined.
 
Russian didn't vote for trump. They did reveal how corrupt the DNC was, staging protests with paid interns, giving Hillary the questions ahead of time during for an upcoming debate, then hiring the DNC chair for her campaign. If Russians helped trump by making the DNC more transparent, that's helping the common voter.
You seem not to speak English very well. Are you Russian, perhaps?
 
Joe went after a corrupt prosecutor (who everyone acknowledged was corrupt who was not investigating his son, no matter how many times you lie and say he was).
The President went after his main opponent in the next election by asking a foreign government to help us.
But why not? The Russians had helped him last time...as we know.
I get that these facts are confusing to you, so it becomes one big jumble.
Trump is very successful that way, too.
Yes, these are techniques, as I said.

Oh, so we don't want other countries interfering in our elections but it's our place to go after their people? I can see how you liberals would be okay with that. You are the true masters of hypocrisy. But I guess if you really wanted Creepy to get rid of Ukranian corruption, chasing down the coke sniffing son is a good place to start. And "as we know"... there is no evidence of Russian influence on our election... no matter how you wish it true.

And so you know, Biden isn't an opponent. Biden doesn't even know where he is half the time. Maybe too many hits to the head from Corn Pop.
 
Nice selective view on the world you have there. What of the bots pumping out false information that either changed votes or helped suppress them? Record low turnouts in the 3 key states won by less than 80,000 votes combined.

Why do you have a problem with political propaganda? You idiot liberals wrote the book on it. Or do you never read yahoo, Huffington Post, CNBC, MSNBC, Esquire, Politico, The New York Times, Bloomberg, etc? It's amazing how you chastise the very shit you pull on a daily basis. Maybe, just MAYBE, Americans came to their senses and realized your liberal bullshit doesn't work anywhere in the world and it was time for a real man in the White House.
 
Nice selective view on the world you have there. What of the bots pumping out false information that either changed votes or helped suppress them? Record low turnouts in the 3 key states won by less than 80,000 votes combined.

Not selective at all. Russians never told me to vote for trump. I ignore false information, not that any came across any of my news feeds. The big reason for me and many americans was that Hillary couldn't be trusted. The cheating, the carelessness with classified information. If Russia was hacking the DNC, you better believe they were hacking her home server. Hillary lost the election just as much as Trump won it.
 
You seem not to speak English very well. Are you Russian, perhaps?
The only proven collusion was the DNC favoring and helping Hillary Clinton. Giving her debate questions, limiting democratic party debates since Hillary was in the lead, Positive press for her and negative press for her democrat opponents straight from Debbie Wasserman Shultz, (DNC Chair).
 
The only proven collusion was the DNC favoring and helping Hillary Clinton. Giving her debate questions, limiting democratic party debates since Hillary was in the lead, Positive press for her and negative press for her democrat opponents straight from Debbie Wasserman Shultz, (DNC Chair).
Thanks for sharing.
Bummer Hillary was such a terrible candidate, for sure. That collusion probably did happen. She was beaten for the Presidency, despite winning millions more votes.
They then investigated how the Russians helped Trump (we knew why they helped him) and, despite indicting many people close to Trump who lied about their Russian relationships, the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that Trump’s campaign colluded in the Russian assistance.
Now we learned that Trump withheld aid to an ally pending the ally’s assurances that they would investigate Trump’s political opposition. So he has been impeached.
 
Oh, so we don't want other countries interfering in our elections but it's our place to go after their people? I can see how you liberals would be okay with that. You are the true masters of hypocrisy. But I guess if you really wanted Creepy to get rid of Ukranian corruption, chasing down the coke sniffing son is a good place to start. And "as we know"... there is no evidence of Russian influence on our election... no matter how you wish it true.

And so you know, Biden isn't an opponent. Biden doesn't even know where he is half the time. Maybe too many hits to the head from Corn Pop.
Finally, a post without a false statement! Opinion stated as opinion.
Good job, Outlaw!
But your last paragraph begs the question of why, then, did Trump say “do us a favor, though...” and proceed to request an investigation of Joe Biden? I think it’s because he’s an opponent. If you don’t, that’s ok.
 
Thanks for sharing.
Bummer Hillary was such a terrible candidate, for sure. That collusion probably did happen. She was beaten for the Presidency, despite winning millions more votes.
They then investigated how the Russians helped Trump (we knew why they helped him) and, despite indicting many people close to Trump who lied about their Russian relationships, the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that Trump’s campaign colluded in the Russian assistance.
Now we learned that Trump withheld aid to an ally pending the ally’s assurances that they would investigate Trump’s political opposition. So he has been impeached.

No, they investigated Biden's son... and rightfully so. He had ZERO qualifications for that job. You know, same way you libtards bag on Trump's kids having jobs. Ring familiar, hypocrite?
 
Finally, a post without a false statement! Opinion stated as opinion.
Good job, Outlaw!
But your last paragraph begs the question of why, then, did Trump say “do us a favor, though...” and proceed to request an investigation of Joe Biden? I think it’s because he’s an opponent. If you don’t, that’s ok.

Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.
 
Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.

After the fact, trying to cover his ass. It seems to have worked at least partially - you fell for lit.
 
Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.
Right. And Putin told Trump they didn’t help him with the election.
And OJ said he was positively not guilty. He was right!
Whatever works!
 
Back
Top