OMG

Sheriff Joe said:
Now now now, it will all be over in 5 years.
Click to expand...

I think the legal process and ensuing sentences should be longer than that. Maybe t will get a doctor to certify that he is too ill (perhaps chronic boneitis, an aftereffect of well-documented youthful bone spurs) to withstand prison.

 
espola said:
Even at the basic chromosomal level, there are more than 2 genders - more than just XX and XY. I thought you were educated.
Click to expand...


There are only TWO dumbass Spola....only two.

Try as you may..
Try as you might...
It appears ya ain't got a brain cell in sight....
 
espola said:
I think the legal process and ensuing sentences should be longer than that. Maybe t will get a doctor to certify that he is too ill (perhaps chronic boneitis, an aftereffect of well-documented youthful bone spurs) to withstand prison.

Click to expand...
Who cares? Trump will have another 2 or 3 scotus justices and hundreds federal judges by then and you all will be wearing straight jackets, oxymoronish isn’t it.
 
Not right in the head, but very last one.



Mom Asks SCOTUS to Review the State’s Stripping Her of Parental Rights, Giving Her Son Narcotics, & Changing His Gender

Posted at 9:47 pm on July 26, 2019 by Alex Parker


al









As reported by The Christian Post, a writ of certiorari was filed Wednesday on behalf of a mother whose child’s transgenderism was enabled by his school against her wishes. And more — holy cow, more.

The WOC, incidentally, requests that a lower court deliver its record in a case so a higher court may review it.

Anmarie Calgaro wants the U.S. Supreme Court to evaluate what her local school Minnesota district did in 2016.

At the time of her initial federal lawsuit, she described the situation in a news conference:

“Last year, without my knowledge or consent, without any court hearings or legal process, without any involvement on my part whatsoever, a legal aid group that gives free services to low income people created a notice of emancipation for my 15-year-old son. Suddenly, my son — without any notice to me — was no longer under my supervision.

“Based on that piece of paper alone, he began receiving public assistance, including medical services and housing and food support. The St. Louis County Health and Human Services treated him as an adult. I couldn’t get any information regarding my son. Even the school refused to allow me access to his records.

“It was then brought to my knowledge that my son had begun receiving hormone replacement treatments from Park Nicollet Health Services to transition from male to female with medical assistance paying for this. I was not consulted or informed about this in any way. I had no way to give or receive any information about my son.”

Geez Louise.

She also indicated that narcotics had been prescribed to her son.





In May of 2017, District Court Judge Paul Magnuson ruledagainst Anmarie, stating the following:





“The School District argues that Calgaro has failed to plausibly allege that the execution of a School District policy or custom caused the deprivation of Calgaro’s parental rights. The School District is correct. Calgaro fails to provide any facts that the School District executed a policy or custom that deprived Calgaro of her parental rights without due process.”

The writ notes, in part:

[T]he St. Louis County School District in Minnesota has a custom and practice of barring a parent for more than two years from involvement in the child’s education after a child is deemed by the school principal, not by a court order, to be emancipated. This is an unacceptable situation for any parent and a serious violation of parental and due process rights.

I recently wrote, in another article, “Sometimes — okay, a lot of times — I read a news story and simply can’t believe what’s happening in the world. As it seems to me, there are some really messed up things going on.”

This would definitely be one.





If parents lose their rights to the state, it’s time for a really hard reboot. Despite the pronouncement by some on the Left, America is not made grand by its diversity. The United States became the greatest nation in the world — first and foremost — because of its liberty. And it must continue to possess that greatest of virtues in order to remain so.
 
Victors secret.

The moral decay continues.

REPORT: Victoria’s Secret Hires First Transgender Model
Valentina Sampaio of Brazil
transmodel.jpg

MIGUEL MEDINA / Staff / Getty Images
paul-bois.jpg

By PAUL BOIS
@PAULBOIS39
August 4, 2019
2.1k views


A man presenting himself as a woman will reportedly be modeling for a brand that markets itself exclusively to women.




CLICK TO PLAY

Report: Scientists Are Creating Human-Monkey Embryos


According to Fox News, lingerie empire Victoria's Secret has hired its first transgender model – Valentina Sampaio of Brazil.

"Victoria's Secret has reportedly hired its first-ever transgender model — less than a year after the lingerie company came under fire after an executive made remarks about transgender people walking in its annual fashion show," reports the outlet.

Speculation as to Sampaio's inclusion among the Victoria's Secret roster began when the transgender model posted a photo of himself at a shoot with "VS Pink" on Instagram. Shortly thereafter, the Brazilian model Lais Ribeiro tweeted that she was "so happy" that Sampaio experienced his first photoshoot with Victoria's Secret.

The inclusion of Sampaio comes months after L. Brands’ (parent company of Victoria's Secret) Chief Marketing Officer Ed Razek sparked the ire of social justice leftists when he told Vogue that little interest exists for plus-size and trans models on the runway.

"I think we address the way the market is shifting on a constant basis. If you’re asking if we’ve considered putting a transgender model in the show or looked at putting a plus-size model in the show, we have," Razek said, adding that the sister division, Lane Bryant, was created to fill that consumer need.


"We invented the plus-size model show in what was our sister division, Lane Bryant," he continued. "Lane Bryant still sells plus-size lingerie, but it sells a specific range, just like every specialty retailer in the world sells a range of clothing. As do we."

"We market to who we sell to, and we don’t market to the whole world," he said. "We attempted to do a television special for plus-sizes [in 2000]. No one had any interest in it, still don't."

After significant backlash on social media, Razek later apologized, admitting his comments on trans models were "insensitive."

"My remark regarding the inclusion of transgender models in the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show came across as insensitive," he said in a statement. "I apologize. To be clear, we absolutely would cast a transgender model for the show. We've had transgender models come to castings ... and like many others, they didn't make it. ... But it was never about gender. I admire and respect their journey to embrace who they really are."

Shortly thereafter, People confirmed that Victoria's Secret's CEO Jan Singer would be leaving the company, though no details were provided as to why. A week later, L Brands’ chairman and chief executive officer Leslie H. Wexner released a statement saying, "I wish Jan well. I greatly appreciate her passion and know she will succeed in whatever she pursues next. We appreciate all that she brought to the brand."


In 2017, Playboy broke barriers when the magazine introduced their first-ever transgender playmate — Ines Rau. The move drew immediate criticism on social media, with former porn star Jenna Jameson leading the way.

"I have a problem with it just like I have a problem with a transgender competing against biological women in sports," Jameson tweeted. "I think it’s setting fire to an iconic brand and pandering to this ridiculous PC world we live in."

Deflecting the criticism, Playboy went as far to compare Ines Rau to the magazine's first black playmate in 1965.

The magazine Vanity Fair, of course, helped spark the trend by featuring Caitlyn Jenner on its cover in 2015.

READ MORE: PROGRESSIVISM TRANSGENDER
 


Victoria’s Secret Grants Your Wish: Its New Underwear Angel is a Man

Posted at 4:49 pm on August 04, 2019 by Alex Parker












In 1995, while talking about the famed underwear catalog, Jeff Foxworthy remarked, “That underwear they make now — it’s so skimpy, Victoria doesn’t have a whole lotta secrets left.”

Well, she’s gonna be trying to keep one…

According to Fox News, Victoria’s Secret has enlisted its first man to be its first woman being represented by its first man.

Brazil’s Valentina Sampaio — a guy identifying as a gal — will soon be front and center for any males wanting to get a look at a female in skimpy clothes.

And for any woman looking for someone like her in their drawers — they’ll get a dude.

Curiously — as in sports as of late — men continue their takeover of women in the role of being women. And the feminists are all crickets.





Maybe this is just the new shift — we’re living in the Era of Men; society’s decided it’s time for a renewed male domination.

Or perhaps, in the case of the bra brand, it’s a bit of damage control: VS got in some trouble a while back with regard to size and sirs.

As reported by The Daily Wire:

The inclusion of Sampaio comes months after L. Brands’ (parent company of Victoria’s Secret) Chief Marketing Officer Ed Razek sparked the ire of social justice leftists when he told Vogue that little interest exists for plus-size and trans models on the runway.

“I think we address the way the market is shifting on a constant basis. If you’re asking if we’ve considered putting a transgender model in the show or looked at putting a plus-size model in the show, we have,” Razek said, adding that the sister division, Lane Bryant, was created to fill that consumer need.

“We invented the plus-size model show in what was our sister division, Lane Bryant,” he continued. “Lane Bryant still sells plus-size lingerie, but it sells a specific range, just like every specialty retailer in the world sells a range of clothing. As do we.”

“We market to who we sell to, and we don’t market to the whole world,” he said. “We attempted to do a television special for plus-sizes [in 2000]. No one had any interest in it, still don’t.”

Ed ended up apologizing. Here’s how that went:

“My remark regarding the inclusion of transgender models in the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show came across as insensitive. I apologize. To be clear, we absolutely would cast a transgender model for the show. We’ve had transgender models come to castings … and like many others, they didn’t make it. … But it was never about gender. I admire and respect their journey to embrace who they really are.”

Ever wish you had a nickel for every time someone in the public eye uttered the word “insensitive”?

Victoria’s move is a logical cultural step — in 2017, Playboy debuted its first male Playmate, Ines Rau. That way, men could get exactly what they were looking for when cracking open the bunny-eared mag: a half-nekkid man.










Outspoken pro-life porn star Jenna Jameson was unimpressed:






But the beat (women) goes on:






media



-ALEX


 
Make Your Mark: The Pasadena Rose Parade Invites Men Who Identify as Women to Be Its Next Queen

Posted at 6:40 pm on August 08, 2019 by Alex Parker












If you’re a man who’s always wanted to lead the New Year’s Day Tournament of Roses Parade in Pasadena, your time has come.

That’s right: The iconic extravaganza has opened up its title of Rose Queen to dudes.

Why not just have a Rose King, too? They’ve had a few, since 1905.

But this is different. Who doesn’t wanna be queen for a day?

There is a catch, though; you can be a man, but you’ve gotta conform to the social construct of female: It seems you’ll have to dress like a lady.

As reported by Pasadena Now, the Parade’s changed its rules so the royal court now invites any and all candidates who “identify as female.”





Once again, men swoop in to unseat a girl who would’ve otherwise gotten an opportunity. First sports (here, here, and here), then Playboy, then Victoria’s Secret (here), now a Rose is a ruse — I mean, rose. Get outta the way, chicks, and let Ethel Merman sing it to ya — anything you can do, men can do better. Or at least, they’ll try to.

From Pasadena Now:

A change to the Tournament of Roses application for the Royal Court could allow transgender applicants the opportunity to enter the process. Requirements previously required that applicants “must be female,” but this year the requirement has changed to “must identify as female.”

Actually, the local outlet specifies that men aren’t welcome:

As before, men still are not allowed to enter the process.

So no men, but any people who identify as female. But also not just women.

Sounds like in Pasadena, they’ve got their own kinds of people walkin’ around.





But the important thing is the important thing that’s always the important thing, as stated by Tournament of Roses Chief Executive Officer David Eads:

“We have always tried to be very inclusive and embrace diversity.”

But not so inclusive as to allow men.

And this new diversity began over half a year ago:


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top