OMG

Nice selective view on the world you have there. What of the bots pumping out false information that either changed votes or helped suppress them? Record low turnouts in the 3 key states won by less than 80,000 votes combined.

Not selective at all. Russians never told me to vote for trump. I ignore false information, not that any came across any of my news feeds. The big reason for me and many americans was that Hillary couldn't be trusted. The cheating, the carelessness with classified information. If Russia was hacking the DNC, you better believe they were hacking her home server. Hillary lost the election just as much as Trump won it.
 
You seem not to speak English very well. Are you Russian, perhaps?
The only proven collusion was the DNC favoring and helping Hillary Clinton. Giving her debate questions, limiting democratic party debates since Hillary was in the lead, Positive press for her and negative press for her democrat opponents straight from Debbie Wasserman Shultz, (DNC Chair).
 
The only proven collusion was the DNC favoring and helping Hillary Clinton. Giving her debate questions, limiting democratic party debates since Hillary was in the lead, Positive press for her and negative press for her democrat opponents straight from Debbie Wasserman Shultz, (DNC Chair).
Thanks for sharing.
Bummer Hillary was such a terrible candidate, for sure. That collusion probably did happen. She was beaten for the Presidency, despite winning millions more votes.
They then investigated how the Russians helped Trump (we knew why they helped him) and, despite indicting many people close to Trump who lied about their Russian relationships, the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that Trump’s campaign colluded in the Russian assistance.
Now we learned that Trump withheld aid to an ally pending the ally’s assurances that they would investigate Trump’s political opposition. So he has been impeached.
 
Oh, so we don't want other countries interfering in our elections but it's our place to go after their people? I can see how you liberals would be okay with that. You are the true masters of hypocrisy. But I guess if you really wanted Creepy to get rid of Ukranian corruption, chasing down the coke sniffing son is a good place to start. And "as we know"... there is no evidence of Russian influence on our election... no matter how you wish it true.

And so you know, Biden isn't an opponent. Biden doesn't even know where he is half the time. Maybe too many hits to the head from Corn Pop.
Finally, a post without a false statement! Opinion stated as opinion.
Good job, Outlaw!
But your last paragraph begs the question of why, then, did Trump say “do us a favor, though...” and proceed to request an investigation of Joe Biden? I think it’s because he’s an opponent. If you don’t, that’s ok.
 
Thanks for sharing.
Bummer Hillary was such a terrible candidate, for sure. That collusion probably did happen. She was beaten for the Presidency, despite winning millions more votes.
They then investigated how the Russians helped Trump (we knew why they helped him) and, despite indicting many people close to Trump who lied about their Russian relationships, the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that Trump’s campaign colluded in the Russian assistance.
Now we learned that Trump withheld aid to an ally pending the ally’s assurances that they would investigate Trump’s political opposition. So he has been impeached.

No, they investigated Biden's son... and rightfully so. He had ZERO qualifications for that job. You know, same way you libtards bag on Trump's kids having jobs. Ring familiar, hypocrite?
 
Finally, a post without a false statement! Opinion stated as opinion.
Good job, Outlaw!
But your last paragraph begs the question of why, then, did Trump say “do us a favor, though...” and proceed to request an investigation of Joe Biden? I think it’s because he’s an opponent. If you don’t, that’s ok.

Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.
 
Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.

After the fact, trying to cover his ass. It seems to have worked at least partially - you fell for lit.
 
Trump specifically said, "no... no quid pro quo. Just tell them to do the right thing." Too bad your key witness, Sondland, PRESUMED the President meant something else. Personally, I think it's a bad idea to presume "yes" when the President specifically tells you "NO". And he wasn't referring to Creepy Joe. Creepy wasn't the one working for Ukraine at $80k a month for 5 years. The good news is it was probably harder to get some good coke over there and he couldn't keep banging his dead brother's widow.
Right. And Putin told Trump they didn’t help him with the election.
And OJ said he was positively not guilty. He was right!
Whatever works!
 
After the fact, trying to cover his ass. It seems to have worked at least partially - you fell for lit.

Oh, okay... didn't realize you were in the room. I just remember you clowns badmouthing Sondland until he agreed to change his testimony to favor your 3-year shit show. Man, how badly did THAT backfire? LMAO!
 
After the fact, trying to cover his ass. It seems to have worked at least partially - you fell for lit.
Ukrainian President said he didn't take the request as a quid pro quo. He said he didn't feel threatened. Trump says he asked for a favor, no quid pro quo. Those are the only two parties directly involved in the conversation, plus the transcript. everyone else's testimony was their opinion of the conversation and what they heard from a 3rd party. Investigation for money never happened, so there's nothing to be guilty for. But don't you find it highly suspicious that biden's son was getting all this money from Ukraine with no expertise in the field, the only thing he had to offer was access to the white house through his father. a shady company that was being investigated. I think it warrants an investigation, don't you?
 
Right. And Putin told Trump they didn’t help him with the election.
And OJ said he was positively not guilty. He was right!
Whatever works!

When your boy Mueller spends 2-years digging for dirt and doesn't find any, I know you're disappointed, but live with Trump's re-election and celebrate with us... your mental illness helped him earn it.
 
Right. And Putin told Trump they didn’t help him with the election.
And OJ said he was positively not guilty. He was right!
Whatever works!
And Obama was actually caught on a hot mic and video telling Dmitry Medvedev that he would be more flexible after his re-election. Medvedev said he would relay that to Putin. So whos colluding with who?

 
Right. And Putin told Trump they didn’t help him with the election.
And OJ said he was positively not guilty. He was right!
Whatever works!
And Trump just put new santions on Russia by the way. If hes friendly with Russia, hes certainly not acting like it. If Russia helped Trump get elected, Russia got played.
 
Back
Top