OMG
- Thread starter Sheriff Joe
- Start date
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
If they come here to breach our borders, they're illegal. There's a process and their "fault" is seeking it by leapfrogging people doing it the right way. Listen, I get it... liberals are desperate for votes, but it's time we stop rubbing the tummies of criminals and ILLEGAL ALIENS here breaking our laws. I had nothing to do with South America's problems so I'm not going to be financing their "hardship" as they traverse or bypass 8 other countries to get here, but I would, however, be fine with you sending money to them if it somehow alleviates your guilt... or the guilt of your ancestors. That's what libs do best... spend other people's money.
It's bad enough the fucking moron, that is Gavin Newsom, decided to give "free" benefits to these criminals... maybe one day the libtard community will realize nothing is free and wake up from the stupor that is their redass from losing in 2016.
South America?
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Central America... South America... Mexico... what's the difference? You want to help everyone less fortunate, right? Might as well include African countries because they're waiting at our borders, too.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Talk about continuing to display ignorance and proud of it. Epitomized.
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Any ass clown can tell someone they're stupid. That's usually the last card played when you've lost an argument. An articulate response would be presented, instead... but I like yours better. "talk about continuing to display ignorance..."
LMAO!
Please continue.
An articulate response is something you will rarely, if ever, get from huckster....
Or you.
From the wanker with more two word responses than anybody on the forum...
F'n Magoo, nice of you to chime in for your boy Daffy.
Isn't it nap time for you?
Yes, but the WWC is on and I'm eating lunch. And how is that relevant to your usual empty blather, for which my 1 or 2 words is usually enough to summarize my response?
Your usual two word responses are hardly articulate, so for you to point your lead less pencil and accuse me of such, is relevant.
To those not on meds, drunk, suffering dementia or delusions of grandeur it makes perfect sense....
Which of those are you implying in my direction? I admit to the "meds" which keep my lungs open, treat patchy excema, and guard against a possible infection for the next few days. Which of those do you think degrades my judgment?
Multi Sport
DA
None of the above. It's just your brain...
Sheriff Joe
DA
Male Hurdler Competing in the NCAA Women’s Division Tells ESPN It’s the Women Who Have the Advantage
Posted at 12:00 pm on June 15, 2019 by Alex Parker
Screenshot from Outside the Lines, https://twitter.com/OTLonESPN/status/1139224819009052674?]
As RedState’s Kira Davis covered at the end of May, a man named CeCe Telfer raked track-runnin’ ladies over the coals as he leapt to victory in the NCAA DII women’s 400-meter hurdles on May 25th.
CeCe ran for Franklin-Pierce University as “Craig” last year, competing against men. But now, CeCe’s dustin’ the girls.
Some people thought it was great that CeCe did his thang. Parker Molloy, for example:
Parker characterized conservative media that recounted CeCe’s win as suffering from an irrational fear and doing a bit of fit-pitching:
Parker posted this to sock it to right-wingers:
So goes the culture war, I suppose.
As for the war on the track, CeCe says the battle was indeed unfairly fought — women had the advantage over him:
“If anything, me competing against cisgender females is a disadvantage because my body is going through so many medical implications, like it’s going through biochemistry changes.”
Such was told to ESPN’s Outside the Lines Thursday.
He explained that his strength is all messed up:
“So being on hormone replacement therapy, your muscle depletion, your muscle is deteriorating, you lose a lot of strength because testosterone is where you get your strength and agility and all that athletic stuff, so I have to work twice as hard to keep that strength. And if I slack a day that’s like three days set behind.”
In case your’e wonderin’, the NCAA now lets dudes compete against chicks if they suppress their testosterone levels for a full year.
Does that make them shorter? CeCe’s over six feet tall. And it’s…hurdles.
I spotlighted CeCe’s trajectory in February. Please check out my article, “Sad Sack: Man Sets Record In NCAA Women’s Track — And He’s Headed For The March Championships.”
I think it’s great CeCe’s competing in sports, and he looks like an impressive athlete. And I believe he should present himself however he chooses.
Also, the girl who placed 2nd in the championship would’ve won, and #3 would’ve come in 2nd, and so on, just a few years ago. In effect, the NCAA is making a move against female athletes — men are bigger, faster, stronger. If women want to give up some athletic career potential and compete against the men, it’s their prerogative. But what about the ones who don’t? Not everyone does. Olympic medalist Sharron Davies, for instance:
Thanks Joe. Great story. Next time post the long version. We need to know more. It’s good that they have media sites for this stuff. I know it’s important to you.
Male Hurdler Competing in the NCAA Women’s Division Tells ESPN It’s the Women Who Have the Advantage
Posted at 12:00 pm on June 15, 2019 by Alex Parker
Screenshot from Outside the Lines, https://twitter.com/OTLonESPN/status/1139224819009052674?]
As RedState’s Kira Davis covered at the end of May, a man named CeCe Telfer raked track-runnin’ ladies over the coals as he leapt to victory in the NCAA DII women’s 400-meter hurdles on May 25th.
CeCe ran for Franklin-Pierce University as “Craig” last year, competing against men. But now, CeCe’s dustin’ the girls.
Some people thought it was great that CeCe did his thang. Parker Molloy, for example:
Parker characterized conservative media that recounted CeCe’s win as suffering from an irrational fear and doing a bit of fit-pitching:
Parker posted this to sock it to right-wingers:
So goes the culture war, I suppose.
As for the war on the track, CeCe says the battle was indeed unfairly fought — women had the advantage over him:
“If anything, me competing against cisgender females is a disadvantage because my body is going through so many medical implications, like it’s going through biochemistry changes.”
Such was told to ESPN’s Outside the Lines Thursday.
He explained that his strength is all messed up:
“So being on hormone replacement therapy, your muscle depletion, your muscle is deteriorating, you lose a lot of strength because testosterone is where you get your strength and agility and all that athletic stuff, so I have to work twice as hard to keep that strength. And if I slack a day that’s like three days set behind.”
In case your’e wonderin’, the NCAA now lets dudes compete against chicks if they suppress their testosterone levels for a full year.
Does that make them shorter? CeCe’s over six feet tall. And it’s…hurdles.
I spotlighted CeCe’s trajectory in February. Please check out my article, “Sad Sack: Man Sets Record In NCAA Women’s Track — And He’s Headed For The March Championships.”
I think it’s great CeCe’s competing in sports, and he looks like an impressive athlete. And I believe he should present himself however he chooses.
Also, the girl who placed 2nd in the championship would’ve won, and #3 would’ve come in 2nd, and so on, just a few years ago. In effect, the NCAA is making a move against female athletes — men are bigger, faster, stronger. If women want to give up some athletic career potential and compete against the men, it’s their prerogative. But what about the ones who don’t? Not everyone does. Olympic medalist Sharron Davies, for instance:
Sheriff Joe
DA
What can I say?
I’m a giver too.
Giving is its own reward.
Sheriff Joe
DA
These commies should try it.
You tell us Magoo.
Your two word responses?
Inability to carry on a conversation?
Your meds?
Dementia?
You're just any angry old man?
You lack any semblance of humor or humility?
All of the above?