North Korea

espola said:
Have you decided whether or not you trust the reporting of the NY Times? It seems you are on both sides of that question.
Click to expand...
Keep trying Sunshine... just try reading the post. It's not like it's encrypted. While you're at it, clue TD in on how to do that as well since you two represent "everyone".
 
Nonononono said:
Founded in 1851, still the major national newspaper of record, and the paper has won 125 Pulitzer Prizes. Seems like a reputable source for accurate reporting, to any rational and reasonable person of average intelligence.

Unless you have an ulterior motive to seek to discredit it’s record of 167 years of reporting truth to power.

At least one person in this country presently has a personal vendetta to seek to undermine the paper’s credibility due to so many accurate yet humiliating stories exposing his criminal enterprises. Surely you’re not supportive of such an ongoing effort, true?
Click to expand...


NOTHING accurate comes from the NYT.....NOTHING.
 
espola said:
Do you trust the reporting of NYT or not?
Click to expand...
Obviously you trust the NYY so by extension you trust they vetted the "article" in question.

So when they post an a piece that states that North Korea is dismantling a missiles facility it must be true because the NYT posted it.
 
nononono said:
Damn knucklehead, after four times of having their noses
rubbed in it even my dogs know what's being implied......
Click to expand...
Ah. So maybe your avatar is not based on a pedophilia Japanese cross-dressing anime series. It’s based on your cruelty to your animals by pressing their poop into their noses while saying “no” four times.

Thus your constant references to excrement. It’s all unraveling for you this week. “ SAD !!! ”
 
Wow.....The Fat Slob Bob just expressed his affinity for
two Asian subcultures of a very disgusting variety....

The fat old pasty has moved from the Reno subculture to Asian..
What's next Bob.....HRC's NXIVM....
 
I will admit, in not sure where things go with NK. At this point going on the offensive isn't a good option because they have South Korea as a hostage.
Likewise it will be tough to hit them with sanctions, if China doesn't play along. And it's hard to see China playing along in a trade war.

It will be interesting to see Trumps next move, as from what I see we really don't have any good options.
 
tenacious said:
I will admit, in not sure where things go with NK. At this point going on the offensive isn't a good option because they have South Korea as a hostage.
Likewise it will be tough to hit them with sanctions, if China doesn't play along. And it's hard to see China playing along in a trade war.

It will be interesting to see Trumps next move, as from what I see we really don't have any good options.
Click to expand...
Backed into a corner by his own great negotiating skills and lack of historical reference.
 
The point of course being that if we attack the Rocket Man, we will have to get all the wives and soldiers kids of the US soldiers living in South Korea out first.
Idk if I believe Trump or any President would make the first move there? Just too costly when sanctions have already proven effective. But of course without China of board, sanctions would have no teeth.

Graham: Trump came 'really close' to moving U.S. dependents out of South Korea
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/16/trump-south-korea-dependents-graham-825858

Sen. Lindsey Graham confirmed on Sunday “there was a point in time” when he and President Donald Trump seriously discussed pulling U.S. military dependents out of South Korea — a move that would have been widely seen as a precursor to military action on the peninsula.

The South Carolina Republican said that at the time, “it looked like nothing was going to happen, there was no dialogue going” with North Korea about its nuclear program, adding that “once you start moving dependents out of South Korea, that is a signal to everybody that we're running out of time.”


Graham cautioned on CBS' "Face the Nation" that “we're not out of the woods yet when it comes to North Korea,” but he said the Trump administration’s renewed diplomatic talks have de-escalated the situation and bought time for denuclearization to be achieved peacefully.

CBS host John Dickerson asked Graham whether that discussion, described in journalist Bob Woodward’s new White House expose, "Fear," was portrayed accurately, Graham responded that “we were really close to having to make that hard decision” but that “now we have some time.”

When Dickerson noted that Woodward reports in his book that the Pentagon read Trump’s readiness to announce the removal of dependents as a potential act of war, Graham responded only that Trump was “very frustrated with North Korea saying one thing and doing another.”

The senator said he warned the president that moving dependents “is the last decision you make” when preparing for war.
Click to expand...
 
tenacious said:
The point of course being that if we attack the Rocket Man, we will have to get all the wives and soldiers kids of the US soldiers living in South Korea out first.
Idk if I believe Trump or any President would make the first move there? Just too costly when sanctions have already proven effective. But of course without China of board, sanctions would have no teeth.
Click to expand...


And your point is........ha...you have no point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top