Multi Sport
DA
But try to go back and read the thread...So why did you bring up the NYT article?
But try to go back and read the thread...So why did you bring up the NYT article?
Did you read your post just before mine yet?So why did you bring up the NYT article?
I thought you were smart? Guess not if you can't figure that one out..
Keep trying Sunshine... just try reading the post. It's not like it's encrypted. While you're at it, clue TD in on how to do that as well since you two represent "everyone".Have you decided whether or not you trust the reporting of the NY Times? It seems you are on both sides of that question.
Keep trying Sunshine... just try reading the post. It's not like it's encrypted. While you're at it, clue TD in on how to do that as well since you two represent "everyone".
Founded in 1851, still the major national newspaper of record, and the paper has won 125 Pulitzer Prizes. Seems like a reputable source for accurate reporting, to any rational and reasonable person of average intelligence.
Unless you have an ulterior motive to seek to discredit it’s record of 167 years of reporting truth to power.
At least one person in this country presently has a personal vendetta to seek to undermine the paper’s credibility due to so many accurate yet humiliating stories exposing his criminal enterprises. Surely you’re not supportive of such an ongoing effort, true?
Did you find it or not?Do you trust the reporting of NYT or not?
Obviously you trust the NYY so by extension you trust they vetted the "article" in question.Do you trust the reporting of NYT or not?
@espolaObviously you trust the NYY so by extension you trust they vetted the "article" in question.
So when they post an a piece that states that North Korea is dismantling a missiles facility it must be true because the NYT posted it.
The spelling and grammar is ok, and they almost always get the date right.NOTHING accurate comes from the NYT.....NOTHING.
Do you trust the reporting of NYT or not?
Absolutely. They published a completely fabricated fictional set of stories, historically called the “Pentagon Papers” that were proven to be a complete fraud.NOTHING accurate comes from the NYT.....NOTHING.
Ah. So maybe your avatar is not based on a pedophilia Japanese cross-dressing anime series. It’s based on your cruelty to your animals by pressing their poop into their noses while saying “no” four times.Damn knucklehead, after four times of having their noses
rubbed in it even my dogs know what's being implied......
Backed into a corner by his own great negotiating skills and lack of historical reference.I will admit, in not sure where things go with NK. At this point going on the offensive isn't a good option because they have South Korea as a hostage.
Likewise it will be tough to hit them with sanctions, if China doesn't play along. And it's hard to see China playing along in a trade war.
It will be interesting to see Trumps next move, as from what I see we really don't have any good options.
Graham: Trump came 'really close' to moving U.S. dependents out of South Korea
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/16/trump-south-korea-dependents-graham-825858
Sen. Lindsey Graham confirmed on Sunday “there was a point in time” when he and President Donald Trump seriously discussed pulling U.S. military dependents out of South Korea — a move that would have been widely seen as a precursor to military action on the peninsula.
The South Carolina Republican said that at the time, “it looked like nothing was going to happen, there was no dialogue going” with North Korea about its nuclear program, adding that “once you start moving dependents out of South Korea, that is a signal to everybody that we're running out of time.”
Graham cautioned on CBS' "Face the Nation" that “we're not out of the woods yet when it comes to North Korea,” but he said the Trump administration’s renewed diplomatic talks have de-escalated the situation and bought time for denuclearization to be achieved peacefully.
CBS host John Dickerson asked Graham whether that discussion, described in journalist Bob Woodward’s new White House expose, "Fear," was portrayed accurately, Graham responded that “we were really close to having to make that hard decision” but that “now we have some time.”
When Dickerson noted that Woodward reports in his book that the Pentagon read Trump’s readiness to announce the removal of dependents as a potential act of war, Graham responded only that Trump was “very frustrated with North Korea saying one thing and doing another.”
The senator said he warned the president that moving dependents “is the last decision you make” when preparing for war.
The point of course being that if we attack the Rocket Man, we will have to get all the wives and soldiers kids of the US soldiers living in South Korea out first.
Idk if I believe Trump or any President would make the first move there? Just too costly when sanctions have already proven effective. But of course without China of board, sanctions would have no teeth.