Hüsker Dü
DA
See, per these posts you both project your thought process in concerns to this forum. I'm pretty sure E doesn't think about it as much as you two apparently do.
North Korea
- Thread starter tenacious
- Start date
I love when you stick up for you dad.
Loyalty is not as common or as appreciated as it used to be.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Not so much sticking up for him as exposing your hypocrisy, like always.
Sheriff Joe
DA
E is medicated and strapped down.
Hüsker Dü
DA
That would be nono's situation 23 hours a day. He does get an hour a day, when he behaves, to vent.
Medicated, maybe. It's after "working hours".
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close
Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.
By
Hillel Fradkin And
Lewis Libby
July 21, 2015 7:38 p.m. ET
526 COMMENTS
The Obama administration assures Americans that the Iran deal grants access within 24 days to undeclared but suspected Iranian nuclear sites. But that’s hardly how a recalcitrant Iran is likely to interpret the deal. A close examination of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action released by the Obama administration reveals that its terms permit Iran to hold inspectors at bay for months, likely three or more.
Paragraphs 74 to 78 govern the International Atomic Energy Agency’s access to suspect sites. First, the IAEA tells Iran “the basis” of its concerns about a particular location, requesting clarification. At this point Iran will know where the IAEA is headed. Iran then provides the IAEA with “explanations” to resolve IAEA concerns. This stage has no time limit.
Opportunities for delay abound. Iran will presumably want to know what prompted the IAEA’s concern. The suspect site identified by the IAEA is likely to be remote, and Iran will no doubt say that it must gather skilled people and equipment to responsibly allay IAEA concerns. Iran may offer explanations in stages, seeking IAEA clarifications before “completing” its response. That could take a while.
Only if Iran’s “explanations do not resolve the IAEA’s concerns” may the IAEA then “request access” to the suspect site. Oddly, the agreement doesn’t specify who judges whether the explanations resolve concerns. If Iran claims that it has a say in the matter, the process may stall here. Assuming Iran grants that the IAEA can be the judge, might Iran claim that the “great Satan” improperly influenced IAEA conclusions? Let’s assume that Tehran won’t do that.
Now the IAEA must provide written reasons for the request and “make available relevant information.” Let’s assume that even though the IAEA may resist revealing the secret sources or technical means that prompted its suspicions, Iran acknowledges that a proper request has been supplied.
Only then do the supposed 24 days begin to run. First, Iran may propose, and the IAEA must consider, alternative means of resolving concerns. This may take 14 days. Absent satisfactory “arrangements,” a new period begins.
entire article:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/iran-inspections-in-24-days-not-even-close-1437521911
Sheriff Joe
DA
I thought that mayor lady did want Trump's help?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Did you trust Obama? Hillary?
Family values are traditional American values.
(Tear rolls down my face.)
Hüsker Dü
DA
The commander in chief is a great example, he has started at least three families!
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
And your mommy & daddy started one too many.
A (perhaps) meaningless bit of trivia --
In the final FIFA vote today to select the host of the 2026 WC, South Korea voted for the North American combined proposal. North Korea voted for Morocco.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...choose-between-north-america-and-morocco-live
In the final FIFA vote today to select the host of the 2026 WC, South Korea voted for the North American combined proposal. North Korea voted for Morocco.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...choose-between-north-america-and-morocco-live
