They should have kept DA but changed it to include high school soccer. It was a better development process than what we currently have.what do you mean "accommodate"? where is the money? No NWSL team currently has an Academy. The boys do but they can be sold and in America that is still a rarity but getting better. That is how they can pay for academies or like Barcelona.. they charge the players for tuition. They may have a "relationship" with a club but I really doubt the are subsidizing anything, they can't afford to.
I really doubt SD Surf ECNL is going to change their tactics to "develop" players that will drop them in any sort of ranking or jeopardize their competitiveness as seen in the SW conf. Its just not how ECNL and club soccer works here. Top Girls go to top clubs. Maybe at younger ages but not from U14 up. Also who is considered "home grown"? Is any female player out of San Diego considered homegrown to Wave? How about LA? Surf is literally a franchise so is it geographic or per club? Would Wave get homegrown for New England Surf? All this sounds good but the implementation has giant holes. DA was a great idea when it started and look how that went.
They were planning to have high school soccer the year following its demise. What they don’t publicly say is that Parlow hated DA.They should have kept DA but changed it to include high school soccer. It was a better development process than what we currently have.
Definitely a vengeful move that only harmed the girls and their soccer development.They were planning to have high school soccer the year following its demise. What they don’t publicly say is that Parlow hated DA.
Definitely a vengeful move that only harmed the girls and their soccer development.
We're going to see the impact of this decision in the next 5 years through our inability to compete in international competition and a large increase of international soccer players in NWSL and college soccer.
The recipe and vision was to be better than what we currently have because we saw that the girls overseas were starting to catch up and surpass the US if the training system remained the same.I'm curious about the DA comment.
Was the recipe and vision the DA had expected to be on par or better than a girls programs overseas?
100% about the vision. I'm sure many had good intentions. We were told by the head boss of the GDA from the Netherlands that "The World is Watching" and so they came in heavy handed, slapped us with so many rules that most clubs were confused, changed to calendar year, told every Doc and club owner to offer fully funded teams for each of the clubs three top teams (it was 3 combo teams to start, like 98/99, 00/01 and 02/03), have "B" and "A" licensed coaches, state of the art fields, top DOCs, 10 months of soccer, no high school soccer and no other sports allowed or you were regulated to the second tier league ECNL. I bought in early on and drank so much of this Kool aid I got sick. The truth? This was a money grab, a power grab, destroy high school and college soccer and make sure the Blues get their business destroyed because Tad and others were 100% against this Gestapo take over because of the mental abuse this took on the girls.The recipe and vision was to be better than what we currently have because we saw that the girls overseas were starting to catch up and surpass the US if the training system remained the same.
Sounds like you had a bad experience and many parents from ECNL probably are going through the same experience you had too.100% about the vision. I'm sure many had good intentions. We were told by the head boss of the GDA from the Netherlands that "The World is Watching" and so they came in heavy handed, slapped us with so many rules that most clubs were confused, changed to calendar year, told every Doc and club owner to offer fully funded teams for each of the clubs three top teams (it was 3 combo teams to start, like 98/99, 00/01 and 02/03), have "B" and "A" licensed coaches, state of the art fields, top DOCs, 10 months of soccer, no high school soccer and no other sports allowed or you were regulated to the second tier league ECNL. I bought in early on and drank so much of this Kool aid I got sick. The truth? This was a money grab, a power grab, destroy high school and college soccer and make sure the Blues get their business destroyed because Tad and others were 100% against this Gestapo take over because of the mental abuse this took on the girls.
Money & Power Grab at the very top, not for the clubs. ECNL was 100% regulated. We agree to disagree. Regarding Blues, let me be frank. My dd played for Tad and won a state championship. Our 03/04 team was #1 in the country and was only going to get better. Parents, Docs, coaches, players that were loyal at Beach FC, & Legends FC were pissed off that Blues would poach their top players for ECNL and the college connections. College connection is and still the bait. Crazy Larry had the great OM and other top 04/05s. I was approached in 2016 by 3 of the top Docs in Socal to leave the Blues Kickball Program or my dd would get left behind. I was told that the Blues work on a very tight budget, had no fields (lost the Ranch) and their coaches were not supporting the US Soccer Training Centers (100% true) and had no real "Licence" to coach girls. Blues had no way to offer "fully funded" and would be out of business soon. Strikers OC and Blues were offered bags of cash by one of the richest clubs in the Nation to go away. The reason Blues struggled in the GDA is because their players were poached (bought) and offered 100% free rides, free uniforms, free travel and in some cases a spending Per Diem. Blues did NOT offer free rides to the stars and when all this went down and the age change came, most of the top players left for greener pasture and a chance for the invite to the Training Centers (new ODP) and through the TC, an invite to YNT List was promised. The Doc of these clubs was also the Training Center Director and "The Man." He had what the parents and kids wanted and that my friend was a big problem. He now had all the power one needs to poach players from the Blues and other clubs and boy did he. Blues did help some of the poor families and parents would offer free rides in their car to get that player to practice and to the games because most of the poor parents had two jobs to pay their bills and no stay home mommy.As for the money grab, it wasn't. DA was more expensive for clubs to run than ECNL because the coaching requirements were higher and the training/development requirements were higher.
As for Blues, I'm not sure why you would say that. Blues was a part of DA. Your daughter could have chosen to be part of Blues DA program. Blues started struggling more in DA because there was more competition OC because DA admitted more clubs. Blues still did great until Baker left and took a lot of top ECNL age players. Even after that, Blues is getting better again.
This is still happening.Money & Power Grab at the very top, not for the clubs. ECNL was 100% regulated. We agree to disagree. Regarding Blues, let me be frank. My dd played for Tad and won a state championship. Our 03/04 team was #1 in the country and was only going to get better. Parents, Docs, coaches, players that were loyal at Beach FC, & Legends FC were pissed off that Blues would poach their top players for ECNL and the college connections. College connection is and still the bait. Crazy Larry had the great OM and other top 04/05s. I was approached in 2016 by 3 of the top Docs in Socal to leave the Blues Kickball Program or my dd would get left behind. I was told that the Blues work on a very tight budget, had no fields (lost the Ranch) and their coaches were not supporting the US Soccer Training Centers (100% true) and had no real "Licence" to coach girls. Blues had no way to offer "fully funded" and would be out of business soon. Strikers OC and Blues were offered bags of cash by one of the richest clubs in the Nation to go away. The reason Blues struggled in the GDA is because their players were poached (bought) and offered 100% free rides, free uniforms, free travel and in some cases a spending Per Diem. Blues did NOT offer free rides to the stars and when all this went down and the age change came, most of the top players left for greener pasture and a chance for the invite to the Training Centers (new ODP) and through the TC, an invite to YNT List was promised. The Doc of these clubs was also the Training Center Director and "The Man." He had what the parents and kids wanted and that my friend was a big problem. He now had all the power one needs to poach players from the Blues and other clubs and boy did he. Blues did help some of the poor families and parents would offer free rides in their car to get that player to practice and to the games because most of the poor parents had two jobs to pay their bills and no stay home mommy.
You might want to read some of the comments she’s said about her dad. (Very dismissive)) it might change your opinion. Apparently he’s a super fan of hers and travels to watch every game she’s ever played.HUGE Alex Morgan fan! Hopefully she can stay on the team and play indefinitely like a Pete Rose player/coach arrangement- last night showed she's still 'got it' and is just as fiery and effective as ever!
Yes, it was an uphill battle, like any beginning. 5/70 is 13 clubs per person. That's tough but I think 15 scouts/technical advisors would have worked and on a rotating basis. However, I think they should have banned those scouts from working for Clubs and their affiliates/tournaments for 5 years after working as a Scout/advisor to prevent a conflict of interest.The Technical advisors that were hired by the DA in 2017 were supposed to set the tone for clubs to follow. They were also supposed to double as scouts. The Tech Adv. are now the Talent ID managers, but spread pretty thin since it's not just for DA they focus on.
US Soccer has known the womens/youth side was in trouble as far back as 2006. Tony DiCicco was very vocal about this and after he finished the U20 World Cup in early 2009 and he focused his World Cup report on the fact that we were already behind. I recall he had a section in the report of some of the basic technical skills lacking as well as some of the basics the coaches had to spend time teaching.
The Girls DA came on the scene in fall '17. 8 years of US Soccer either sitting on the problem or unaware of how to address it.
The DA had 5 Tech advisors and 70 something teams. Crush's reference earlier to 'the netherlands' wasn't just a SoCal experience. It was an uphill battle from the start.
The so-called "scouts" were former ODP scouts and some of the Docs. My dd Doc was a National YNT Scout, Head Training Center Director in San Diego and had too much power, MOO!Yes, it was an uphill battle, like any beginning. 5/70 is 13 clubs per person. That's tough but I think 15 scouts/technical advisors would have worked and on a rotating basis. However, I think they should have banned those scouts from working for Clubs and their affiliates/tournaments for 5 years after working as a Scout/advisor to prevent a conflict of interest.
You might want to read some of the comments she’s said about her dad. (Very dismissive)) it might change your opinion. Apparently he’s a super fan of hers and travels to watch every game she’s ever played.
What's off is the idea that it's business as usual, at least until the newly appointed coach takes the team. We will see if she does or is allowed to do what she feels best. There are now contractual restrictions and politics still embedded. Essentially US soccer as a whole is stagnant in many of the key areas. Such as picking the same players or the same kind of players that offer very little difference in how they play (i.e. most of the forward line from last nights game).I did not watch the game but based on what Alex Morgan ("Mexico brought it tonight") said and what Carli Lloyd said is troublesome. It seemed that Mexico had Ganas and we did not. The win against the Dominican Republic was all praise about this and that and how the USA was back. Something is off with this team.
"Mexico was exceptional. Best I've seen from them in a long time. Confident, brave, relentless, organized and hungry!" (= Ganas) Lloyd said.
During a criticism of the USWNT, Lloyd stated that a "lack of motivation crept in during 2020, giving other teams the confidence that they can beat the US team."
I think the competition to make the US team needs to be more intense and cutthroat with no politics, no guarantees and no contracts and big sponsor to be on the team. Pro, yes on the guaranteed contracts. I would suggest putting together a college all-star team of players who are knocking on the door for a call up to get this team ready for Spain and England. 2 shots on goal against a team that didn't make the World cup is no bueno. I love our country and want us to win. No spot should be safe. The new coach has her work cut out for her, but she can do it. The school of hard knocks.
I agree 100% with youWhat's off is the idea that it's business as usual, at least until the newly appointed coach takes the team. We will see if she does or is allowed to do what she feels best. There are now contractual restrictions and politics still embedded. Essentially US soccer as a whole is stagnant in many of the key areas. Such as picking the same players or the same kind of players that offer very little difference in how they play (i.e. most of the forward line from last nights game).