Hüsker Dü
DA
I believe the door was propped open due to the scorching heat.
Massacre Again
- Thread starter Dominic
- Start date
Hüsker Dü
DA
It is Texas law they must wear them and have them on during any investigation, but then there is this: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/so...aw-allows-police-to-withhold-body-cam-footage
Breaking news by the Husler himself.
So much for transparency.
Dont blame me, I wasnt there
Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steven McCraw said Friday, when asked why police at Robb Elementary School didn’t engage the shooter sooner, said “the on-scene commander at the time believed that it had transitioned from an active shooter to a barricaded subject.”
“A decision was made on the scene – I wasn’t there -- that this was a barricaded subject situation, there was time to retrieve the keys and wait for a tactical team with the equipment to go ahead and breach the door and take on the subject,” he continued. “At that point, that was the decision, that was the thought process.”
McCraw later said “from the benefit of hindsight from where I am sitting now, that of course it was not the right decision, it was a wrong decision, very, there was no excuse for that.”
“I wasn’t there but I’m just telling you from what we know, that we believe there should have been an entry as soon as you can,” he added
Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steven McCraw said Friday, when asked why police at Robb Elementary School didn’t engage the shooter sooner, said “the on-scene commander at the time believed that it had transitioned from an active shooter to a barricaded subject.”
“A decision was made on the scene – I wasn’t there -- that this was a barricaded subject situation, there was time to retrieve the keys and wait for a tactical team with the equipment to go ahead and breach the door and take on the subject,” he continued. “At that point, that was the decision, that was the thought process.”
McCraw later said “from the benefit of hindsight from where I am sitting now, that of course it was not the right decision, it was a wrong decision, very, there was no excuse for that.”
“I wasn’t there but I’m just telling you from what we know, that we believe there should have been an entry as soon as you can,” he added
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
I KNOW you do not know the TRUTH.
You have a long history of " Believing " a multitude of LIES spewed from the Left.
Post a statement that is FACT that supports " Your " belief.
Something with both shootings:
A) Buffalo, New York
( It is now KNOWN that a " retired " FBI agent was in communication with the shooter
thirty minutes before the incident.)
B) Uvalde, Texas
( It is now KNOWN that the timeline initially released was filled with either intentional
or pure incompetent misleading statements.)
How did this individual who was supposedly arguing with his Grandmother over
small finances afford a couple of $ 2000.00 + Rifles/Hand Guns/Body Armour/Ammunition
Etc....where did he get the hardware/who sold it to him/who stated that he was mentally
competent to even possess them. Didn't both individuals ( Buffalo/Uvalde ) have known
mental health issues that had been DUCUMENTED with the local School Districts ?
If it is found that the FBI was aware, or in communication with this individual - then a
100% solid case can be made for the COMPLETE DISBANDING OR OVERHAUL of the
Department.
How many times have they been aware/communicating/associated with a volatile suspect ?
Parkland ?
Buffalo ?
Michigan ?
California ? ( Multiple Times )
New York ?
The list is endless.....
It seems like they only protect their own or paycheck.
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
Speaking of Transparency.....how about You !
The news on these two mass shootings is getting crazier by the hour.
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
It is know known that just the city of Uvalde, Texas ( who knows how many others )has been overwhelmed
with RELEASED illegal immigrants, including Felons/Pedos/Rapists......making it almost impossible to keep
up with day to day crimes and potentially violent crimes.
YES, a solid case can be made that DIRECTLY IMPLICATES the current administration as to deliberately
creating the circumstances that led up to this and possibly many many more incidents in the future.
Blood is on their hands once again.
The current administration is a rudderless boat in a storm of it's own creation.
Just pure EVIL.
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
Just some " Food " for thought from a different perspective.
GUNS AND CONTROL
Turkey established gun control in 1911. Soon after, 1.5 million Armenians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
The Soviet Union established gun control in 1929. Soon after, about 20 million dissidents unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. Soon after, 20 million political dissidents unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938. Soon after, a total of 13 million **** and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. Soon after, one million people unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. Soon after, 100,000 Mayan Indians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. Soon after, 300,000 Christians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Austrellia established gun control in 1996. Right now, Australian citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
Venezuela established Desarma La Violencia to disarm citizens in 2010. Once one of the richest countries in Latin America, Venezuela is currently free falling into violent unrest and extreme poverty.
New Zealand expanded gun control in 2019. Right now, New Zealand citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
Canada expanded gun control in 2020. Right now, Canadian citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
WHO’S NEXT?
" US " ?
GUNS AND CONTROL
Turkey established gun control in 1911. Soon after, 1.5 million Armenians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
The Soviet Union established gun control in 1929. Soon after, about 20 million dissidents unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. Soon after, 20 million political dissidents unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938. Soon after, a total of 13 million **** and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. Soon after, one million people unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. Soon after, 100,000 Mayan Indians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. Soon after, 300,000 Christians unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
Austrellia established gun control in 1996. Right now, Australian citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
Venezuela established Desarma La Violencia to disarm citizens in 2010. Once one of the richest countries in Latin America, Venezuela is currently free falling into violent unrest and extreme poverty.
New Zealand expanded gun control in 2019. Right now, New Zealand citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
Canada expanded gun control in 2020. Right now, Canadian citizens are being brutalized and terrorized by their tyrannical government.
WHO’S NEXT?
" US " ?
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
Report: Police Got Own Kids out of School While Subduing Other Uvalde Parents – RedState
Uvalde Shooter Fired Outside School for 12 Minutes Before Entering - WSJ
www.thegatewaypundit.com
nypost.com
Uvalde Shooter Fired Outside School for 12 Minutes Before Entering - WSJ
Uvalde Mother Placed in Handcuffs by Federal Marshals For Attempting to Enter School to Save Her Child While Salvador Ramos Went on Killing Spree | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Regional Director for the Department of Public Safety South Texas, Victor Escalon, Jr.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Cops handcuffed mom amid Texas school shooting before she jumped fence, ran inside to save her kids
Angeli Rose Gomez was among the frantic parents outside Robb Elementary and was handcuffed by officers before she was freed and then ran into the school to retrieve her two kids herself.
nypost.com
The timing of this is sus a little in your brain or just bad luck? I could 100% splain the real truth but at this point in the game of life and lies, no one will believe me. I know how to read the real numbers like no other and like I said before a million times, when the TRUTH is revealed it will shock all of you, even the liars and non-believers. Symbolism will be their down fall. Let's play hang man Husker Du.
FACT
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
"He also said that a teacher propped open the back door at 11:27 a.m., enabling 18-year-old Salvador Ramos to enter the school unimpeded at 11:33 a.m. after crashing his grandmother’s truck outside the building at 11:28 a.m."
Last edited:
Hüsker Dü
DA
This is America . . . this IS who we are.
gulfnews.com
Texas shooting: America’s great gun addiction
Change will not come because we looked into our national heart and found goodness therein
gulfnews.com
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Friday said he was “misled” by authorities and “livid” about the events surrounding the Uvalde school shooting following discrepancies in the timeline surrounding the tragedy.
"I was misled," he said during a news conference, saying he had received "'inaccurate" information. "I am livid by what happened. I was on this very stage two days ago and I was telling the public information that had been told to me."
"I wrote down handnotes in detail about what everybody in that room told me in sequential order about what happened," he added. "As everybody has learned, the information that I was given turned out, in part, to be inaccurate. I'm absolutely livid about that."
The police response to the shooting that killed 19 children and two teachers have come under public scrutiny following contradicting reports from law enforcement and revelations that authorities did not engage the suspected gunman sooner.
Abbott demanded that law enforcement officials "get to the bottom of every fact with absolute certainty."
"I was misled," he said during a news conference, saying he had received "'inaccurate" information. "I am livid by what happened. I was on this very stage two days ago and I was telling the public information that had been told to me."
"I wrote down handnotes in detail about what everybody in that room told me in sequential order about what happened," he added. "As everybody has learned, the information that I was given turned out, in part, to be inaccurate. I'm absolutely livid about that."
The police response to the shooting that killed 19 children and two teachers have come under public scrutiny following contradicting reports from law enforcement and revelations that authorities did not engage the suspected gunman sooner.
Abbott demanded that law enforcement officials "get to the bottom of every fact with absolute certainty."
Multi Sport
DA
If the door was locked, like it was supposed to be, lives would have been spared.
It's like a "hire power" is in charge and knows things that the average human is clueless about. I'm not trying to be a whacko brother. I'm just wondering how one can get the help he needed to carry out his ritual calling of killing 19 ten year olds. Too many things don't add up and too many things came together that makes this mass killing some sort planned event or killing. I also see it's very speculative on my part and it could be like getting hit by lightning a few times.
Did Justice Burger Call Gun Lobby's Take on 2nd Amendment a Fraud on the American Public?
Warren Burger was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Richard Nixon in 1969.
www.snopes.com
District of Columbia v. Heller - 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008)
RULE:
Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. Nothing in the Supreme Court's Heller opinion should be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms. The Supreme Court identifies presumptively lawful regulatory measures only as examples; the list does not purport to be exhaustive.
CONCLUSION:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Court determined that the Second Amendment's prefatory clause announced a purpose but did not limit or expand the scope of the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrated that it connoted an individual right to keep and bear arms, and the Court's reading of the operative clause was consistent with the announced purpose of the prefatory clause. None of the Court's precedents foreclosed its conclusions. The Court held that the Second Amendment right was not unlimited, and it noted that its opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on certain long-standing prohibitions related to firearms.
The SCOTUS ruling
RULE:
Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. Nothing in the Supreme Court's Heller opinion should be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms. The Supreme Court identifies presumptively lawful regulatory measures only as examples; the list does not purport to be exhaustive.
CONCLUSION:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Court determined that the Second Amendment's prefatory clause announced a purpose but did not limit or expand the scope of the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrated that it connoted an individual right to keep and bear arms, and the Court's reading of the operative clause was consistent with the announced purpose of the prefatory clause. None of the Court's precedents foreclosed its conclusions. The Court held that the Second Amendment right was not unlimited, and it noted that its opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on certain long-standing prohibitions related to firearms.
The SCOTUS ruling