Let Them Play CA

Good rebuttal. You spend a bunch of time on that? Another cop died today because another thug was on the street and shouldn’t have been. Maybe you libtards will get it when you’re victimized.

Nooooboooodyyyyy carrreeessssss whaaaaattttt yyooooouuuuu hhaaaaaavveeeeee tooooooo saaaaaaaaayyyyyyy Scooooooootttttt....
 
"The working class"?

The reason I am no longer working is that I retired (and I would probably be judged to be disabled if back in the workforce anyway).

Let me pull a hypothetical out of thin air -- you really can't help yourself. Let's discuss that.

Meh...to my knowledge you haven't said you are in a home (which given you've been pro-lockdown you think you would lead with since it would be a powerful rhetorical tool)....we know you have progressive views, have a mixed race family, know enough to be on the computer, know your kids care about you and have been looking in on you, read primary source history so you aren't a dumb dumb or completely destitute....you aren't exactly out there bagging groceries so maybe check your privilege a little?
 
Then all HR is....which is fine...kind of agree with you, but it is very helpful in understanding people and what drives them.

This particular quackery starts from unsupported judgments and then uses them to prove themselves. And not very well, at that - if a measure of a given population satisfies the original premise, then it is declared by the adherents to be a success, even if the level of success is less than 50%.
 
This particular quackery starts from unsupported judgments and then uses them to prove themselves. And not very well, at that - if a measure of a given population satisfies the original premise, then it is declared by the adherents to be a success, even if the level of success is less than 50%.

a. it doesn't try to prove anything. It just measures where you are on 5 scales. It's a way to sort people....it's not seeking to prove anything.
b. Guess you must feel the same way about implicit bias testing, which unlike MB actually sets out to prove something (e.g., that people are systemically racist),
 
Meh...to my knowledge you haven't said you are in a home (which given you've been pro-lockdown you think you would lead with since it would be a powerful rhetorical tool)....we know you have progressive views, have a mixed race family, know enough to be on the computer, know your kids care about you and have been looking in on you, read primary source history so you aren't a dumb dumb or completely destitute....you aren't exactly out there bagging groceries so maybe check your privilege a little?

My "home" is where I live with my wife. I can take care of myself but I am only good for an hour or two of vigorous labor at a time.

And my first paying job (other than picking produce or delivering papers) included bagging groceries, stocking the shelves, sweeping the floor, etc.
 
I see you've settled into a an explanation for why masks aren't working in Los Angeles. We all knew eventually you would (because you can't fathom the idea hey maybe masks don't work that much).
That's because most of the published data says masks do work. Anomalies are interesting.

Data guy, remember?
 
Wow...they really got you all wrapped up. Not sure where the conspiracy theory exist, but you have shown me through your deep and quantitative research on how he has made our state better...and now I am convinced, you must be right...he does it for everyone else...he is selfless and is working hard for the people. How could I have been so blinded by all the good he does for others. I feel better now that I know Newsom wants what best for me and you. I’m sure he will continue to make our lives great. Thank you for showing me so many ways he has made our State great. You must be so proud to be a follower of his.

Wow that’s some serious passive aggressive
tail between the legs. I do understand why you would try to mock actual facts. Magats never acknowledge when they are wrong; they lack the self-esteem needed for such a thing.

Of course you do not see as a conspiracy theory Gavin Newsom benefited personally from a marijuana law he signed because he had a birthday dinner at the French Laundry with a lobbiest who apparently lobbies for the marijuana industry, and he also signed a marijuana bill at some point, which we know is shockingly rare in CA. For you it isn’t a conspiracy theory at all. It’s “alternative facts” aka “contextualizing”, aka a bald-faced lie that weak-minded people like you lap up from the likes of Parler.

The best part of all this is you have no idea what those laws are even about.
 
a. it doesn't try to prove anything. It just measures where you are on 5 scales. It's a way to sort people....it's not seeking to prove anything.
b. Guess you must feel the same way about implicit bias testing, which unlike MB actually sets out to prove something (e.g., that people are systemically racist),

It leads to semi-educated people spouting words like "he is high on the e scale" as if that actually meant something.
 
My "home" is where I live with my wife. I can take care of myself but I am only good for an hour or two of vigorous labor at a time.

And my first paying job (other than picking produce or delivering papers) included bagging groceries, stocking the shelves, sweeping the floor, etc.

My first paying job (other than baby sitting or delivering papers) was serving drinks to people, doing inventory, sweeping up. Doesn't tell much about how you ended up. All the more impressive though given the breadth of your knowledge.
 
It leads to semi-educated people spouting words like "he is high on the e scale" as if that actually meant something.

It does. It's a descriptive of one aspect of his personality.

And if you think I'm semi-educated....wow....there must only be a handful of the truly educated for you out in the country (with 95% of us being ignorant to you)....nice.
 
My first paying job (other than baby sitting or delivering papers) was serving drinks to people, doing inventory, sweeping up. Doesn't tell much about how you ended up. All the more impressive though given the breadth of your knowledge.

I graduated from high school in 1965 and got my ABCS in 1980. I had a broad education, and I didn't stop learning then.
 
How many of us have been perfect in following the covid rules?

I agree he messed up. I don't want to recall someone over a dinner, though.

The bigger problem is botching the vaccine rollout.
Recall not only a dinner, the refusal to get military hospitals set up for this surge, leaving his winery open while closing down everyone else business, flee to montana house instead of staying and suffering the restrictions he imposed. Failure to have a vax plan despite being told to prepare. So ya RECALL
 
I graduated from high school in 1965 and got my ABCS in 1980. I had a broad education, and I didn't stop learning then.

That was during Vietnam. Did you serve? My father came over the same year during the medical recruitment program to take care of all the boys who came back injured during those times.
 
Good rebuttal. You spend a bunch of time on that? Another cop died today because another thug was on the street and shouldn’t have been. Maybe you libtards will get it when you’re victimized.

I guess too many posts in a row had gone by without a racist blaming black people for something.

I totally see why that justifies overthrowing the government of the U.S. and, in so doing, beating a cop to death with the American flag. I can also see why it justifies killing more Americans of Covid at an even higher rate than we already are. Totally relevant if you’re in an online Klan forum. Oh wait, you are.
 
I'm much more sure of the J now. ISFJ....am I right? Close at least?
Remember what I said about not liking deconstructivism?

It's dehumanizing. I am not simply a cishet white male INTJ FUMB.

I am a person whose opinions can stand or fall based on the arguments I can muster. As are you.

So like my arguments, or don't. But don't ask for my help putting me into a box.
 
Remember what I said about not liking deconstructivism?

It's dehumanizing. I am not simply a cishet white male INTJ FUMB.

I am a person whose opinions can stand or fall based on the arguments I can muster. As are you.

So like my arguments, or don't. But don't ask for my help putting me into a box.

O.k. I totally get the T (I was torn on that)....but an N really? Intuition is not data. If you really are a data guy it can't be an N! How does that reconcile? Data guy who thinks he's a data guy but isn't really (would also explain your political tendencies)?

In reality, truth is actually very fluid and subjective. The box doesn't prove anything about you. It does though help understand your tendencies and where you come from (such as predicting you'd settle on an explanation for Los Angeles and masks as opposed to being comfortable with maybe there isn't an explanation and I don't really need to have one) It help understand the argument, because the argument itself is at best superficially only 50% of the answer.
 
Back
Top