Is DA done?

I have tracked the results for years and the games I saw, the DA teams usually lost/won to non-DA teams according to the expectations of YSR predictions. The only ones that seem skewed are LAFC and many of the MLS DA's around the country. LAFC should be even higher than they are in composite score and I think that is because they play their subs a lot and early on in the game against the lower level DA's. In fact, LAFC has sent their younger squad to play low level DA's and they still won easily. YSR doesn't know that, it just inputs the data. Had they sent their age appropriate team it would have been a massacre. As I have previously noted the disparities between mls and non mls da's outside California are even larger. So< i expect they are doing the same; they are playing their subs more frerquently and maybe sending younger squads against weaker teams. It's all just more proof that the non mls DA's were a poorly executed plan. Don't even get me started on ODP, what a cluster f***.

You are correct, ECNL seems to have a prestige advantage over the other leagues, especially on the girls' side but I only scout on the boys side and honestly, I follow players and teams not leagues and clubs. Club prestige and history means very little to me until it actually translates to real success. SCDSL copied CSL by having one primary place to play and that definitely helps scouting in practical terms. CSL sends out over 2000 premier guides to coaches and scouts and I think the other leagues will follow suit with print or online links to all those teams and players. But to me the promotion/relegation must be the difference in why a CSL team that is frequently regarded as inferior because of a stigma, frequently beats the top teams from the other leagues that claim superiority. Once again, huge difference between girls and boys regarding these leagues.
agreed. interesting... are the premier guides helpful?

with the DA game reports there was a lot of data, if one wanted to drill down on a player but doesn't seem like leagues track the same data at all.
 
I have tracked the results for years and the games I saw, the DA teams usually lost/won to non-DA teams according to the expectations of YSR predictions. The only ones that seem skewed are LAFC and many of the MLS DA's around the country. LAFC should be even higher than they are in composite score and I think that is because they play their subs a lot and early on in the game against the lower level DA's. In fact, LAFC has sent their younger squad to play low level DA's and they still won easily. YSR doesn't know that, it just inputs the data. Had they sent their age appropriate team it would have been a massacre. As I have previously noted the disparities between mls and non mls da's outside California are even larger. So< i expect they are doing the same; they are playing their subs more frerquently and maybe sending younger squads against weaker teams. It's all just more proof that the non mls DA's were a poorly executed plan. Don't even get me started on ODP, what a cluster f***.

You are correct, ECNL seems to have a prestige advantage over the other leagues, especially on the girls' side but I only scout on the boys side and honestly, I follow players and teams not leagues and clubs. Club prestige and history means very little to me until it actually translates to real success. SCDSL copied CSL by having one primary place to play and that definitely helps scouting in practical terms. CSL sends out over 2000 premier guides to coaches and scouts and I think the other leagues will follow suit with print or online links to all those teams and players. But to me the promotion/relegation must be the difference in why a CSL team that is frequently regarded as inferior because of a stigma, frequently beats the top teams from the other leagues that claim superiority. Once again, huge difference between girls and boys regarding these leagues.
So, what age group does your LAFC boy play on?
 
So, what age group does your LAFC boy play on?

I don't have a son that plays for LAFC. I have been to many of their youth matches and scouted many of their players. I'm just making observations on what I have seen from tracking players/teams for many years using stats and real results over hype. Was anything I said about them not true or overly biased? I know for a fact they have been beating up non-mls DA's for the last few years and sometimes with youngers. You can't have a so called uniform DA system when there is a 5-6 goal difference between the top and bottom. It's bad for both ends of the spectrum.
 
Another complaint former MLS DAs had was that they did not want to run U12, U14, U5 programs. They wanted to operate only U17 and U19. Now it sounds like they are running a full league across all ages. If that is the case, will the new USYS league split up the U16 and U17?

I anticipate that ECNL will have U16, U17 and U18.
ECNL currently have 6 age groups starting at 12. I don't think it will change.
 
agreed. interesting... are the premier guides helpful?

with the DA game reports there was a lot of data, if one wanted to drill down on a player but doesn't seem like leagues track the same data at all.

The premier media guides are cool but I think they would be much more practical if the players that really wanted to be recruited put their email and/or link to their bio on the media guide team page. The way they do it, there isn't much room for player info so it is a team photo, team bio, and head shot of each player. It's mostly used to contact the coach to further inquire about the player.
 
Another important point with most ECNL teams vs CSL and SCDSL teams- most teams hold their kids to a GPA requirement. ECNL is designed for the college going player. They will cut very good players if they can’t do well in school.

I spoke to the Oxnard coach in CRL last season and he only had 1 or 2 NCAA qualifiers on their entire roster. Outstanding players but college isn’t an option for most of those players.

a player on the team I’m familiar with had a DA kid leave and move to his ECNL team and his ECNL team had many more college commits than the DA team he left. 2/3rd of the boys went on to play around the country. Many of those kids went D3 to highly rated academic school
 
If MLS is trying to be like the r

Everyone worries to much about which league your son plays. During league play its when colleges are in season. Coaches are really busy. Get on a good team with a good coach , play major touraments . Remember you are competing now with foreign players that are on every college teams also.

Yes, totally agree. However, take the DA example. You had a league that was supposed to be the best and parents/players bought into that but the players for the non-mls DA's were just like all the club players except they thought they were better because they wore a DA patch. When a kid and parent thinks their kid is much better than they are, it stifles growth and desire. But yes, absolutely, find a team and coach that will push your kid to their limit and extract the very best from them and that kid will go far regardless of what league they are in.
 
Are Albion, LAUFC, Nomads, TFA and Barca traditionally strong boys teams?

I'm not going to tear down individual clubs. Every age group is different. Look those individual age groups up for those clubs on YSR and you will know the answer. With the way teams are aggressively recruiting players today, it's all about the team and coach. TFA's strongest team for years was '04 SFV but politics led them to leave. That team lost two of their top players to LAFC and still managed to win CSL Premier under a different club banner. Coaches and team chemistry matter over individual players and club prestige.
 
Has there been any confirmation yet on which age groups will be featured in the new MLS league?

U17+ for sure, with MLS academies desire to have u12+ I would guess they will be the looking to go u11+ like the nplwest league did in fall but no confirmation or details yet. May be a while since is all fluid at the moment.

With USYS sanctioning I suppose they could be national championships and others involved for multiple age groups.
 
U17+ for sure, with MLS academies desire to have u12+ I would guess they will be the looking to go u11+ like the nplwest league did in fall but no confirmation or details yet. May be a while since is all fluid at the moment.

With USYS sanctioning I suppose they could be national championships and others involved for multiple age groups.


I thought that was exactly what the MLS teams were trying to avoid. We were told they wanted only U17 and U19 and play only amongst themselves. That's why there were blue division for stronger teams and red division for weaker teams for U19 last season.

Now they are doing the opposite. They are partnering up with USYS to create a league for non -MLS clubs and creating teams for young players.
 
I thought that was exactly what the MLS teams were trying to avoid. We were told they wanted only U17 and U19 and play only amongst themselves. That's why there were blue division for stronger teams and red division for weaker teams for U19 last season.

Now they are doing the opposite. They are partnering up with USYS to create a league for non -MLS clubs and creating teams for young players.

I dunno but once USYS was involved seems like things expanded , maybe Mwn can chime in if he's allowed to comment? After 2 years there are some rights & solidarity issues
 
www.socceramerica.com/publications/article/85429/mlss-todd-durbin-on-launching-new-development-lea.html

SA: Who will be the age groups of the league?

TODD DURBIN: "That is an issue we are still trying to finalize, to be perfectly candid with you. What I think is reasonable to say is that we're going to be participating in two age groups, the most likely being the U-17s and U-15s, but we're also considering whether to also participate regionally with the U-19s as well. A lot of that at some level will become a function of how the geography lays out and the ability to move and travel, which I think will have an impact on the total number of teams. Our current thinking and current plan is we have competition and programming for those three age groups."
 
www.socceramerica.com/publications/article/85429/mlss-todd-durbin-on-launching-new-development-lea.html

SA: Who will be the age groups of the league?

TODD DURBIN: "That is an issue we are still trying to finalize, to be perfectly candid with you. What I think is reasonable to say is that we're going to be participating in two age groups, the most likely being the U-17s and U-15s, but we're also considering whether to also participate regionally with the U-19s as well. A lot of that at some level will become a function of how the geography lays out and the ability to move and travel, which I think will have an impact on the total number of teams. Our current thinking and current plan is we have competition and programming for those three age groups."
That makes absolutely no sense if they're only supporting those two age groups. What does an 18 year old high senior in high school do in this case, when he's aged out? Go back to a local club?
 
So the non-MLS clubs will funnel their talented players U12 to U14 to the MLS teams? And then when there in nowhere for an 18 year old high school senior to go, then he goes back to the local club.

What non-MLS club in their right mind would agree to this? Will be VERY expensive for parents with huge travel distances, few games, and second-class citizen status.
 
That makes absolutely no sense if they're only supporting those two age groups. What does an 18 year old high senior in high school do in this case, when he's aged out? Go back to a local club?
This is an MLS league designed to support MLS teams. If the player isn't good enough to get signed by an MLS team or its affiliated USL team by 18, then they probably have no use for you in the league.
 
Not really apples to apples. CSL Premier is pretty strong top to bottom where the bottom of CRL is pretty weak because teams can get a favorable pool or have a lucky weekend and qualify . CRL is also a side league like NPL so I don't really consider it because it draws from all the other leagues. I have analyzed the primary fall leagues (DA, ECNL, CSL Premier, SCDSL Discovery, and Presidio flt 1) and CSL Premier was slightly above DA and ECNL and significantly above SCDSL and Presidio in YSR composite rankings for boys teams at 3 age groups. Interestingly many of the teams that get relegated in CSL Premier are former DA teams that aged out of academy. Instead of earning it over years they get a weak pool in CRL, qualify for premier then struggle. That was a good indicator the DA's were failing in developing quality players.

Aside from all that, people need to stop thinking their letters are better. I am only making a strong statistical and anecdotal case here for CSL because they have been trashed mercilessly by the DA and ECNL snobs when real results painted a different picture. The hard truth is promotion/relegation works because the necessity to win does foster development but it negates the effects of pay to play and politics. Let me say that again, winning and development are NOT mutually exclusive.

What really needs to happen on the boys side is the top 10-15 teams from all the various leagues within a 3-5 hour drive of an MLS team should be invited to compete in a league with that MLS team. It should be a promotion/relegation system with the MLS Academy not ever getting relegated. The other team are there to support the MLS team and they should naturally be near the top because they will constantly be recruiting players from the other teams and bringing them into hopefully a residential academy structure. It's simple and it would work.
Better if MLS only coordinates things and runs the all star team.

We got this mess in part by having clubs decide on league structure. As soon as that happens, they try to use the power to screw each othe over.
 
Another important point with most ECNL teams vs CSL and SCDSL teams- most teams hold their kids to a GPA requirement. ECNL is designed for the college going player. They will cut very good players if they can’t do well in school.

I spoke to the Oxnard coach in CRL last season and he only had 1 or 2 NCAA qualifiers on their entire roster. Outstanding players but college isn’t an option for most of those players.

a player on the team I’m familiar with had a DA kid leave and move to his ECNL team and his ECNL team had many more college commits than the DA team he left. 2/3rd of the boys went on to play around the country. Many of those kids went D3 to highly rated academic school

I have never heard of that and unless it is in their bylaws it's a meaningless anecdote because every team is different and I'll bet you if you surveyed CSL, Presidio and SCDSL coaches, many would tell you that academics are very important to their teams. Do you have a link to the ECNL grade requirements?
 
Better if MLS only coordinates things and runs the all star team.

We got this mess in part by having clubs decide on league structure. As soon as that happens, they try to use the power to screw each othe over.

Totally agree. To me, CSL has the best structure. It's far from perfect but for the most part it works. The reason clubs flee CSL is they are too impatient to put in the time/effort to move through the ranks and earn their spot in the gold/premier levels. Our whole alphabet soup system of leagues and side leagues is such a political mess. Europe is scratching their heads thinking, what a waste of gifted athletes.
 
Back
Top