Yes! How DARE British born Fiona Hill talk with that English accent!!!! Elitist!!
Impeachment Hearings
- Thread starter Booter
- Start date
Yes! How DARE British born Fiona Hill talk with that English accent!!!! Elitist!!
Listen, because that accent tricked my dd and I in soccer so I have some issues. Sorry, and btw, I'M tired too of all this division......
So just a heads to those who have PM in my in box. First off, I won't out you publicly on here like some dads do just for some hate. I can handle that. Secondly, and take this serious. If any of you make threats to me as some did with EJ, than I will send to the right folks. Talk smack all you want. Call me names all you want just don't threaten me or my kid. Carry on patriots of America.
Last edited:
Libertarians are Republicans every time.
They swing right, no argument there but they will swing left when they want to, they just won't say anything. Independents are switch hitters. My mom bated Right when Reagan was around but went left with Billy. She was born in Arkansas and like his youth and coolness. She did not like his wife, that I can tell you. It's a choice. Win the middle of the self thinkers and those who don't have an agenda and just want everyone to play fair and by the rules and anyone can win next year.
"We are better than that."
After I had given up on being a Republican because they were the party of crooks, and given up on being a Democrat because they were the party of fools., I considered being formally registered as a Libertarian. Alas, I found they were the party of hypocrites.
Now the Tea Party actually had some promise for a while of being a viable alternative party, but in the end they just evolved into a variety of right-wing Republicans. Every politician who claims to be a Tea Party member has been elected as a Republican.
What we need is a rational party, with conservative fiscal and liberal social ideals.
I think you should tell them for me, Douchebag Meth-head (is that it?).
It’s unlikely they wanted anyone jailed and remind yourself that nobody was.
Unlike the Russia hoax, where a WHOLE LOT of Trump people went to jail, right?
I was also talking to my wife today to and telling her, "watch Hill Honey, she will just talk and talk to waste time." Come on, you saw that, right? Rightside attorney was letting her ramble on with that English accent and just talking and talking and talking and talking and talking. That was excellent talking from her. Hire Hill & Holmes whenever you find yourself in a tough situation. There here to save America from a deal maker and his 63,000,000 Trumpist loyalist who shop at Walmart and shoot ak47s for fun in the hills. The others who didn't vote like me are also Trumpist because we didn't vote for Hillary and Bill and his buddy Jefferey. No crime folks, just business as usual.
[/QUOTE]
You're a fraud...............Smoked ya out.
You are projecting again......Scum Bag. The smell of Ammonia Hydroxide permeates
your miserable posts......
Bruddah IZ
DA
Fries U! What a deal?
Bruddah IZ
DA
Fake news
Bruddah IZ
DA
Sucker
Sheriff Joe
DA
Fiona Hill: Obama Denied Weapons to Ukraine for ‘Political’ Reasons
AP Photo/Andrew HarnikJOEL B. POLLAK21 Nov 20192,215
1:55
Former National Security Council official Dr. Fiona Hill testified on Thursday that President Barack Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” on sending weapons to Ukraine for “political” reasons.
Under questioning from Republicans, Hill admitted that she herself had been against giving weapons to Ukraine to help it fight Russian invasion, and that she had written an op-ed in the Washington Post expressing those views.
She also said that the “interagency consensus” had actually been in favor of arming the Ukrainians; she herself was not in government service at the time, but working at the liberal Brookings Institution think tank.
Hill noted that President Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” for what she called “political” reasons. She explained that Obama was concerned that arming the Ukrainians could provoke the Russians.
On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who worked for Hill and remains at the National Security Council, testified that President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold aid from Ukraine temporarily went against the “interagency consensus” on Ukraine, though he also acknowledged that Trump had armed Ukraine while Obama had not.
Democrats say that Trump hurt U.S. national security by jeopardizing American support for Ukraine, and ignoring the “interagency consensus,” for what they claim are political reasons.
1:55
Former National Security Council official Dr. Fiona Hill testified on Thursday that President Barack Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” on sending weapons to Ukraine for “political” reasons.
Under questioning from Republicans, Hill admitted that she herself had been against giving weapons to Ukraine to help it fight Russian invasion, and that she had written an op-ed in the Washington Post expressing those views.
She also said that the “interagency consensus” had actually been in favor of arming the Ukrainians; she herself was not in government service at the time, but working at the liberal Brookings Institution think tank.
Hill noted that President Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” for what she called “political” reasons. She explained that Obama was concerned that arming the Ukrainians could provoke the Russians.
On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who worked for Hill and remains at the National Security Council, testified that President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold aid from Ukraine temporarily went against the “interagency consensus” on Ukraine, though he also acknowledged that Trump had armed Ukraine while Obama had not.
Democrats say that Trump hurt U.S. national security by jeopardizing American support for Ukraine, and ignoring the “interagency consensus,” for what they claim are political reasons.
Bruddah IZ
DA
6 straight years of QE and a near doubling of our National Debt undermines our nation.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Yawn
Wake up. My 30-yrs, $2mm at 3% is good for the country.
Hey Lying Sack of Shit. Soldiers can’t stand you, so keep their names out of your mouth.
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
When it comes to who was responsible for the security lapses that resulted in the death of her brother, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, the ambassador's sister and family spokesperson, Anne Stevens, is not pointing the finger at Hillary Clinton. And it is "inappropriate," she said, to make Benghazi an election issue.
"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta," Stevens said in an interview published Tuesday with The New Yorker's Robin Wright, referring to the former secretaries of State and defense, respectively. "They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."
Instead, Stevens remarked that if any entity had any culpability, it was Congress for the State Department's budget.
"Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted," Stevens told Wright
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
Anne Stevens also said it is "inappropriate" to make Benghazi an election issue.
www.politico.com
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
When it comes to who was responsible for the security lapses that resulted in the death of her brother, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, the ambassador's sister and family spokesperson, Anne Stevens, is not pointing the finger at Hillary Clinton. And it is "inappropriate," she said, to make Benghazi an election issue.
"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta," Stevens said in an interview published Tuesday with The New Yorker's Robin Wright, referring to the former secretaries of State and defense, respectively. "They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."
Instead, Stevens remarked that if any entity had any culpability, it was Congress for the State Department's budget.
"Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted," Stevens told Wright
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
Anne Stevens also said it is "inappropriate" to make Benghazi an election issue.
That's too rational and factual. It won't be the last time someone heare posts "Benghazi!" as if it were an excuse for their continual cluelessness.