Impeachment Hearings

Fiona Hill: Obama Denied Weapons to Ukraine for ‘Political’ Reasons
Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2019, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump's efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
AP Photo/Andrew HarnikJOEL B. POLLAK21 Nov 20192,215
1:55
Former National Security Council official Dr. Fiona Hill testified on Thursday that President Barack Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” on sending weapons to Ukraine for “political” reasons.
Under questioning from Republicans, Hill admitted that she herself had been against giving weapons to Ukraine to help it fight Russian invasion, and that she had written an op-ed in the Washington Post expressing those views.

She also said that the “interagency consensus” had actually been in favor of arming the Ukrainians; she herself was not in government service at the time, but working at the liberal Brookings Institution think tank.

Hill noted that President Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” for what she called “political” reasons. She explained that Obama was concerned that arming the Ukrainians could provoke the Russians.

On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who worked for Hill and remains at the National Security Council, testified that President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold aid from Ukraine temporarily went against the “interagency consensus” on Ukraine, though he also acknowledged that Trump had armed Ukraine while Obama had not.

Democrats say that Trump hurt U.S. national security by jeopardizing American support for Ukraine, and ignoring the “interagency consensus,” for what they claim are political reasons.
 
. . . and the idiots applaud the undermining of our nation. Anything to spite Democrats and especially Obama the one whose appearance alone lit their fuse. They deny Russian influence, they repeat Russian propaganda. They are naive, low information and have been trained to hate America while wrapping themselves in the flag. This is everything the founders feared might happen.
6 straight years of QE and a near doubling of our National Debt undermines our nation.
 
I am just blown away that people like Mulvaney and Pompeo and Barr and Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Spicer exist. Who can possibly lie this much? And Lindsay Graham saying “show me evidence of quid pro quo outside of the transcript and I will he concerned” and then 2 weeks later saying “I’m not even going to read these reports of the hearings.” WTF is wrong with these lying POS’?
That’s why so many of Trump’s people are in jail.
And the only response from the idiots, ever, is “you can keep your doctor.”
Yawn
 
HEY SCUM BAG....YEAH YOU !

GO PREACH YOUR CRAP IN PERSON TO THE FAMILIES OF THE DECEASED......
SEE HOW LONG YOU REMAIN STANDING......SCUMBAG.
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi

When it comes to who was responsible for the security lapses that resulted in the death of her brother, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, the ambassador's sister and family spokesperson, Anne Stevens, is not pointing the finger at Hillary Clinton. And it is "inappropriate," she said, to make Benghazi an election issue.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta," Stevens said in an interview published Tuesday with The New Yorker's Robin Wright, referring to the former secretaries of State and defense, respectively. "They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."

Instead, Stevens remarked that if any entity had any culpability, it was Congress for the State Department's budget.

"Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted," Stevens told Wright


 
Chris Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi

When it comes to who was responsible for the security lapses that resulted in the death of her brother, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, the ambassador's sister and family spokesperson, Anne Stevens, is not pointing the finger at Hillary Clinton. And it is "inappropriate," she said, to make Benghazi an election issue.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta," Stevens said in an interview published Tuesday with The New Yorker's Robin Wright, referring to the former secretaries of State and defense, respectively. "They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."

Instead, Stevens remarked that if any entity had any culpability, it was Congress for the State Department's budget.

"Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted," Stevens told Wright



That's too rational and factual. It won't be the last time someone heare posts "Benghazi!" as if it were an excuse for their continual cluelessness.
 
6 straight years of QE and a near doubling of our National Debt undermines our nation.
Sounds like Izzy missed another QE rally. Tip: change the channel when the Fox News gold coin commercials come on.
According to Izzy Obama is responsible for starting: Social Security, Medicare, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and for the GW Bush Tax cuts.
Comparing Trump seeking foreign intervention in our elections with monetary policy is indeed idiotic.
 
Back
Top