How’s the 2024-2025 season going?

You need to get caught up, Legends 2010
has a fly in from Texas . Solar used to have a fly in . It’s just one player …. These singular players do not make or break any of these teams in my opinion.
If they don’t, then why bring them in? They must be good and impact a team to do it right?
 
With the Socal teams like Pats that just barely made the playoffs I agree with you. Even if they get seeded against some superteam from another part of the nation I'd give them a chance because of who they play during the season.

But other "just barelys" don't stand a chance. For them it's just going to be an expensive weekend that ends in the first round.
Oh I didn't realize Pats barely made the playoffs. Were they not in the top 5 most of the entire year? I remember seeing them in a playoff spot most of the season. They definitely didn't perform as well in the second half as they did the first though and almost messed it up. I would say a team like Blues barely made it as they were not in a playoff spot all season until the end. Slammers and Breakers took their spots with an amazing second half. Surf/Koge/Legends were always locks although Legends started to have some questionable scores. Beach locked in early second half too with that win over Pats. We always said 4-8 was going to go to the last week of the season.
 
Last edited:
You need to get caught up, Legends 2010
has a fly in from Texas . Solar used to have a fly in . It’s just one player …. These singular players do not make or break any of these teams in my opinion.
ahh ok my bad. Does this superstar play regular season or just come in for showcases and playoffs? I don't know. The midfielder the Legends bring in for their big games makes a pretty big difference on their team.
 
Last edited:
A couple things to add:
1. @Carlsbad7 the ECNL playoffs have teams split into 12 groups of 4. you play each of the other 3 teams in a round robin, and the group winners plus four wildcards advance to the round of 16. So, although losing your 1st game would put you behind the 8-ball, in no way are you out of it.
2. For a team like the Pats, I think it is a huge accomplishment to make it into the playoffs. This is only the club's 3rd year in ECNL, so it's part of the growing process. I think back to Jordan's Bulls who made incremental steps in the late 80's before becoming a dynasty in the 90's. In no way will the Pats become a dynasty, just saying sometimes you need baby steps.
 
A couple things to add:
1. @Carlsbad7 the ECNL playoffs have teams split into 12 groups of 4. you play each of the other 3 teams in a round robin, and the group winners plus four wildcards advance to the round of 16. So, although losing your 1st game would put you behind the 8-ball, in no way are you out of it.
2. For a team like the Pats, I think it is a huge accomplishment to make it into the playoffs. This is only the club's 3rd year in ECNL, so it's part of the growing process. I think back to Jordan's Bulls who made incremental steps in the late 80's before becoming a dynasty in the 90's. In no way will the Pats become a dynasty, just saying sometimes you need baby steps.
Surf and MVLA were in the same 2010 group last year. Its also interesting that out of the 11 groups last year only 2 group leaders won their 3 group games. 8 had 2 wins and one of the group leaders only won 1 game! Wild stuff can definitely happen in group play at Champions League.
 
Last edited:
A couple things to add:
1. @Carlsbad7 the ECNL playoffs have teams split into 12 groups of 4. you play each of the other 3 teams in a round robin, and the group winners plus four wildcards advance to the round of 16. So, although losing your 1st game would put you behind the 8-ball, in no way are you out of it.
2. For a team like the Pats, I think it is a huge accomplishment to make it into the playoffs. This is only the club's 3rd year in ECNL, so it's part of the growing process. I think back to Jordan's Bulls who made incremental steps in the late 80's before becoming a dynasty in the 90's. In no way will the Pats become a dynasty, just saying sometimes you need baby steps.
Well that's good to hear. I wasn't paying attention very closely.

All I was pointing out is that usually no matter what league or tournament. Top teams tend to play the bottom teams first. If there's a potential second option for extending the action that's great.
 
These 2010s are about to enter a critical year for recruiting. IMO, I'd be thrilled if my kid's team "barely" made playoffs (Champions league) and had the chance to play the top teams in the country - because coaches show up to those games!
 
It’s totally allowed. With the roster rules and and discovery rules you can get anyone needed at any point during the season or before playoffs to help your team. It’s definitely within the rules. My point is it’s crazy clubs are going to those lengths to win. Also for any non Southwest club I mean Southwest already has ECNL on lock anyway but now with doing that I don’t see any non Southwest team ever winning a championship.
I'm well aware it's allowed, in the rules and all the good stuff. I just have always thought it was unfair and speaks volumes as to what coaches/clubs will do to win a natty. Kind of sad, really.
I do agree with you as to Southwest will win it again this year, and from here on out from the 2010 group.
 
You really think SW is going to sweep all 6 championships this year, and every year going forward?

Seems unlikely, even with the top teams adding a couple ringers.

You need to get caught up, Legends 2010
has a fly in from Texas . Solar used to have a fly in . It’s just one player …. These singular players do not make or break any of these teams in my opinion.

You need to get caught up, Legends 2010
has a fly in from Texas . Solar used to have a fly in . It’s just one player …. These singular players do not make or break any of these teams in my opinion.
I agree I've first hand have seen 2 fly in players (2 separate times) and my thought was "really", not knocking those players but the over hype was real. I was expecting to see a GOAT, and could only shake my head those 2 times.
 
I agree I've first hand have seen 2 fly in players (2 separate times) and my thought was "really", not knocking those players but the over hype was real. I was expecting to see a GOAT, and could only shake my head those 2 times.
I agree with you. The GOATS are already on the top teams, not to say these fly in players arent talented. These top teams would still make a deep run in playoffs without the fly in.
 
Spring by Az showcase had Penn Fusion defeating surf 2-1 with surf having their fly in.

R U certain east coast teams need SoCal players?
based on overall results of SoCal vs the rest of the country yeah I feel top level SoCal girls' could definitely improve a non SoCal team. I just think its funny how the fly in kids are treated so that's why I made that statement.
 
Back
Top