From Russia With Love

I'm once again pointing out the hypocrisy of the left...
They all but ignored the women who accused Clinton of rape...
Look at how they treat the SCOTUS nominee, no evidence, no eyewitness, no one to corroborate the "assault"...
Don't expect Tenacious 'derp to believe that evidence is required, that would require actual detective work. T'd is more of the imaginary fact sleuth just like his fellow Dems.
 
Yes.
Its everyone else who is stupid.

Listen... I know I'm not the only one who notices the smart people have left the Republican party. Or at the least are in hiding. So I'm not saying everyone else is stupid. Just the few Republicans left here in the forum who still bother to try and defend the Republican Party.

Just offering my opinion. Sorry is your offended that I'm pointing out stupid. I know Post-Sarah Palin, you guys get mad but I'm done being PC. Lion's tirades against political correctness inspired me.
 
I'm once again pointing out the hypocrisy of the left...
They all but ignored the women who accused Clinton of rape...
Look at how they treat the SCOTUS nominee, no evidence, no eyewitness, no one to corroborate the "assault"...

Playing the hypocrisy card huh? First of all, I wasn't in high school when Clinton was in office. I didn't vote for him...
And also before you call me a hypocrite... let me ask, you certainly have never ignored the "Clinton Women." You fine with Trump getting the same treatment; or are you yelling about hypocrites, while being a hypocrite? lol (I hope that makes sense)

As for how "they" treat the SCOTUS nominee. Let's just take a moment to remember Merck Garland, and how the Republicans wouldn't even bring him up for a vote. This accusing the other guy while doing the same shit is getting old. That all Ima say about that.
 
Listen... I know I'm not the only one who notices the smart people have left the Republican party. Or at the least are in hiding. So I'm not saying everyone else is stupid. Just the few Republicans left here in the forum who still bother to try and defend the Republican Party.

Just offering my opinion. Sorry is your offended that I'm pointing out stupid. I know Post-Sarah Palin, you guys get mad but I'm done being PC. Lion's tirades against political correctness inspired me.
You people are the smart people, right?
 
Playing the hypocrisy card huh? First of all, I wasn't in high school when Clinton was in office. I didn't vote for him...
And also before you call me a hypocrite... let me ask, you certainly have never ignored the "Clinton Women." You fine with Trump getting the same treatment; or are you yelling about hypocrites, while being a hypocrite? lol (I hope that makes sense)

As for how "they" treat the SCOTUS nominee. Let's just take a moment to remember Merck Garland, and how the Republicans wouldn't even bring him up for a vote. This accusing the other guy while doing the same shit is getting old. That all Ima say about that.

Don't think Einstein here knows what hypocrisy means. Hey dim bulb go look up the word and then apply it to the Kavanaugh ordeal. If you're still having trouble, then please do us all a favor STFU.

You're welcome.
 
Playing the hypocrisy card huh? First of all, I wasn't in high school when Clinton was in office. I didn't vote for him...
And also before you call me a hypocrite... let me ask, you certainly have never ignored the "Clinton Women." You fine with Trump getting the same treatment; or are you yelling about hypocrites, while being a hypocrite? lol (I hope that makes sense)

As for how "they" treat the SCOTUS nominee. Let's just take a moment to remember Merck Garland, and how the Republicans wouldn't even bring him up for a vote. This accusing the other guy while doing the same shit is getting old. That all Ima say about that.
I don't give a flying rats ass if you even attended high school...
The left is full of hypocritical ass wipes...
The Republicans didn't smear Garlands name, never, ever.
The Republicans on the judiciary committee, while disagreeing with Sotomayer & Kagen never tried to destroy their reputations or drag them through the gutter.
Those Republicans then voted to confirm both of them.
This shit is definitely getting old....
 
I don't give a flying rats ass if you even attended high school...
The left is full of hypocritical ass wipes...
The Republicans didn't smear Garlands name, never, ever.
The Republicans on the judiciary committee, while disagreeing with Sotomayer & Kagen never tried to destroy their reputations or drag them through the gutter.
Those Republicans then voted to confirm both of them.
This shit is definitely getting old....

As I recall, the Republicans did not let anyone say anything about Garland.

Did Sotomayor and Kagan have anything in their pasts that would have put them in the gutter?
 
I don't give a flying rats ass if you even attended high school...
The left is full of hypocritical ass wipes...
The Republicans didn't smear Garlands name, never, ever.
The Republicans on the judiciary committee, while disagreeing with Sotomayer & Kagen never tried to destroy their reputations or drag them through the gutter.
Those Republicans then voted to confirm both of them.
This shit is definitely getting old....

Republicans voted 5 yes, 36 no on the confirmation of Elena Kagan.

https://projects.propublica.org/represent/votes/111/senate/2/229

Republicans voted 9 yes, 31 no on the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor.

https://projects.propublica.org/represent/votes/111/senate/1/262
 
As I recall, the Republicans did not let anyone say anything about Garland.

Did Sotomayor and Kagan have anything in their pasts that would have put them in the gutter?
Kavanaugh had nothing in his past (6 FBI back ground checks) to warrant the attacks he was exposed to.
A non corroborated unsubstantiated charge should not put even you in the gutter Magoo.
 
Kavanaugh had nothing in his past (6 FBI back ground checks) to warrant the attacks he was exposed to.
A non corroborated unsubstantiated charge should not put even you in the gutter Magoo.

Nothing in his past? Where have you been the last few weeks?

And why all the petty provable lies and resistance by K and his supporters?
 
As I recall, the Republicans did not let anyone say anything about Garland.

Did Sotomayor and Kagan have anything in their pasts that would have put them in the gutter?

If Sotomayor & Kagen had (R) at the end of their names, I'm sure they would find something "in the gutter".
 
A non corroborated unsubstantiated charge...
I was talking about the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee...fuckin Magooooooooo

The Republicans on the judiciary committee, while disagreeing with Sotomayer & Kagen never tried to destroy their reputations or drag them through the gutter.
Those Republicans then voted to confirm both of them.
 
Back
Top