From Russia With Love

GODWIN, you people are desperate.
Keep grinding, rat.
You're fertilizing the base.
OUR base.
There’s only 5-6 people in your base here. They all live in California. Exactly how will 6 motivated racist California voters affect any election from President to dog catcher?
 
View attachment 2412 Most right-wing nuts on this forum don’t know this. Believe me, believe me. I know, right?

So here’s two conflicting accounts of the same evening. At least one is a lie.

1. Former director of Oval Office relations [and Trump bodyguard] Keith Schiller [testified to] Congress [that] before the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant ― a Russian participant offered to “send five women” to Trump’s hotel room.

Schiller ... discussed the conversation with Trump while walking him to his hotel room that night and they both laughed about it before Trump went to bed alone. Caporegime Schiller and/or lifelong Republican Federal Prosecutor and FBI Director Comey?

Though Schiller testified he stood outside Trump’s room for an unspecified amount of time ... [he] Schiller “could not say for sure what happened during the remainder of the night.”

2. Trump told Comey he had checked with associates and was reminded “that he didn’t stay overnight in Russia” on the trip, during which he presided over the Miss Universe contest. After flying into Moscow in the morning, he “departed for New York that same night,” Trump told Comey.
Who cares?
 
There’s only 5-6 people in your base here. They all live in California. Exactly how will 6 motivated racist California voters affect any election from President to dog catcher?
This pathetic band of idiots, (you and I included) is a microcosm of the general population.
Any generalizations I make regarding "bases" or "groups" are simply extrapolations, with little, if any, basis in reality.
You, of course, play with the exact same deck of cards.
 
This pathetic band of idiots, (you and I included) is a microcosm of the general population.
Any generalizations I make regarding "bases" or "groups" are simply extrapolations, with little, if any, basis in reality.
You, of course, play with the exact same deck of cards.
My cards are the Constitution, 250 years of jurisprudence, reality, ethics, honor, empathy, compassion, active listening skills, history, the respect for an educated and civil debate, and a good eye for spotting hypocrites and satirically rubbing their noses in the shit they drop that they have complete conviction emits no odor and otherwise doesn’t actually exist.
 
My cards are the Constitution, 250 years of jurisprudence, reality, ethics, honor, empathy, compassion, active listening skills, history, the respect for an educated and civil debate, and a good eye for spotting hypocrites and satirically rubbing their noses in the shit they drop that they have complete conviction emits no odor and otherwise doesn’t actually exist.
Your shoes are untied.
 
Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.

There is a sociological effect called Godwin's Law that the plumber may have been referring to, but there are also many derivative threads of meaning that have been derived from that. I'm just wondering which definition he has in mind.
 
There is a sociological effect called Godwin's Law that the plumber may have been referring to, but there are also many derivative threads of meaning that have been derived from that. I'm just wondering which definition he has in mind.
Not hard to figure out if you understand context.
Do you need me to draw a picture?
 
Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage that asserts that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6]where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
 
Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage that asserts that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6]where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
Around here it is the starting point.
 
Around here it is the starting point.
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
 
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
Fake News.
 
Back
Top