Bruddah IZ
DA
Why do you do it than?Protecting fossil fuel industry profits through the promotion of junk Science and denial is foolish.
Why do you do it than?Protecting fossil fuel industry profits through the promotion of junk Science and denial is foolish.
Why do you do it than?The burning of fossil fuels is dirty and possibly dangerous to our environment.
Okay. What would you suggest we do during "Discovery"?We should prioritize the discovery of cleaner more efficient sources of power, like Fusion.
Okay. What would you suggest we do during "Discovery"?
Why do you do it than?
In the mean time what NEW policy would you like to implement that doesn't deny others access to fossil fuels?Listen to Scientists, form policy based on educated evaluations and reasonable assumptions going forward. Not deny that AGW is a possibility and that it could be harmful.
Yes, and you partake of both while enjoying a rising standard of living that includes an increase in life expectancy.Why do we eat bad foods and drink alcohol? It's part of the world we live in.
In the mean time what NEW policy would you like to implement that doesn't deny others access to fossil fuels?
Iʻve seen, first hand, government waste in action for nearly 30 years. Iʻd say that billions more could be cut from all government agencies. We are an administrative state and I am not surprised by the cost. Cutting all subsidies to fossil fuels cuts all subsidies, indirectly, to ALL industries as well. But please go beyond your proposal to address short and long term outcomes.Discontinue all fossil fuel subsidies and cut the DoD budget by $125B and put that money to work in Fusion research and Space Exploration.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...b0774c1eaa5_story.html?utm_term=.65704a7c013d
But please go beyond your proposal to address short and long term outcomes.
You going to let that stop you from opining? Iʻm quite sure your opinion wonʻt affect current policy for better or worse. How ʻbout it?Not my field of expertise
Which industries "were powered by wood, water, wind and animals"?
Again, I don't make policy. Has steam and animals become unreliable?
The burning of fossil fuels is dirty and possibly dangerous to our environment. We should prioritize the discovery of cleaner more efficient sources of power, like Fusion. Protecting fossil fuel industry profits through the promotion of junk Science and denial is foolish.
You going to let that stop you from opining? Iʻm quite sure your opinion wonʻt affect current policy for better or worse. How ʻbout it?
Short term:
Conservative outrage, reduced fossil fuel profits and an increase in alternative energy jobs as they become more competitive, loss of DoD jobs offset by gains in Fusion research and space exploration sectors.
Long term:
Fossil fuels usage would be a smaller percentage of our energy needs. The long term benefits of actually creating useable Fusion would change humankind in dramatic ways. Jobs lost in the energy sector would be more than made up for by new industries and technologies that would allow us to finally reach for the stars. Ideally we would do that worldwide instead of fighting over religions and natural resources.
Top 3?Before the widespread use of fossil fuels, all of them.
We?Why do we eat bad foods and drink alcohol? It's part of the world we live in.
That would be eat bad food...I gotta stop drinkin'.We?
We don't all drink bad food.
We don't all drink alcohol.
We?
We don't all drink bad food.
We don't all drink alcohol.