Strong exit strategy.
It beats circling around the drain playing word games like a JaP junior trainee.
Strong exit strategy.
Ostensibly.It beats circling around the drain playing word games like a JaP junior trainee.
Ostensibly.
q.e.d.
Not long enough apparently.What does that have to do with Canada?
Canadian government has a long history of interfering with Canadian industry, ostensibly to help the Canadian workers and investors - agriculture, railroads, aircraft, automobiles, lumber, mining, fishing...
Not long enough apparently.
Sure.Starting before 1700 and continuing until today. Is that long enough?
Can you tell us what the Canadian government did to "interfere" with Canadian industry?Canadian government has a long history of interfering with Canadian industry, ostensibly to help the Canadian workers and investors - agriculture, railroads, aircraft, automobiles, lumber, mining, fishing...
Sure.
Can you tell us what the Canadian government did to "interfere" with Canadian industry?
How did that interfere or contribute to zero financial crisis for Canada?How about the Automotive Products Trade Agreement of 1965?
...presumably because she believes that competition causes suppliers (in this case K-12 schools) to worsen their service to customers.
Competition for customers is good for customers. Especially the poor.If your premise is wrong, your conclusion will be.
Are you one of those that feel everything should be privatized?Competition for customers is good for customers. Especially the poor.
Competition for customers is good for customers. Especially the poor.
No.Are you one of those that feel everything should be privatized?
Roads?
Where it makes $ense, yes.Roads?
Hospitals?Where it makes $ense, yes.
Where it makes $ense, yes.
Who is offering the bond?Does it make $ense to allow private businesses to compete in the tax-free bond market? Or giving them eminent domain power to confiscate private land?
Again where it makes $ense.Hospitals?