Donald J Trump Enemy of the People

Hüsker Dü said:
Why do you conti,he to support a man who won through voter suppression with the help of Putin? 77,000 votes over three states that had voter turn out nunberswell well below 2008 and 2012. Putin got what he wanted and America got the rise of white nationalist terror groups. Enjoy.
Click to expand...
Lol! Bernie and James suppressed the Democratʻs voters. Not to mention the ones that were too stupid according to Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber.
 
messy said:
A new poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and The Atlantic has uncovered evidence of deep structural barriers to the ballot for black and Latino voters, specifically in the 2016 election. More than that, the survey finds that the deep wounds of Jim Crow endure, leaving America’s democratic promise unfulfilled.

The real extent of voter suppression in the United States is contested. As was the case for poll taxes and literacy tests long ago, restrictive election laws are often, on their face, racially neutral, giving them a sheen of legitimacy. But the new data from PRRI and The Atlantic suggest that the outcomes of these laws are in no way racially neutral. The poll, conducted in June, surveyed Americans about their experiences with voting, their assessments of the country’s political system, and their interfaces with civics. The results, especially when analyzed by race, are troublesome. They indicate that voter suppression is commonplace, and that voting is routinely harder for people of color than for their white counterparts.

research indicating that frequent changes to polling-site locations hurt minority voters more. Additionally, more than one in 10 blacks and Hispanics missed the registration deadline to vote in 2016, as opposed to just 3 percent of whites. And black and Hispanic respondents were twice as likely as white respondents to have been unable to get time off work for voting.

There are informal roadblocks as well. Under the specter of alleged voter fraud by noncitizens—which was based more on anti-immigrant sentiment than any data or other evidence—and amid increasingly incendiary rhetoric about Latinos, Hispanic voters found 2016 especially difficult. “Roughly one in 10 Hispanics said that the last time they or someone in their household tried to vote, they were bothered at the polls,” Dan Cox, the research director at PRRI, told me. “If you think about the idea of a stolen election, it fits easily into this broader narrative of cultural threat, where perceived outsiders are taking something away from people who were already there.”

These results add credence to what many critics of restrictive voting laws have long suspected. First, voter-ID laws and other, similar statutes aren’t passed in a vacuum, but rather in a country where people of color are significantly less likely to be able to meet the new requirements. Whether intended to discriminate or not, these laws discriminate in effect, and while there is no evidence that they’ve averted any kind of fraud, there is plenty of data detailing just how they’ve created Republican advantages. In that way, Trump’s chances in 2016 may have turned not only on the approval or disapproval of white voters, but also on how effectively state laws, access issues, and social penalties conspired to keep black and Hispanic voters away from polling places.
Click to expand...
Suckers gonna keep sucking.
 
messy said:
Actually, Oceanside is the shithole. Rivals Oxnard but at least Oxnard started to upgrade over by the beaches.
Click to expand...

The Oceanside City Council is hoping to sell off all the city-owned property near the beach before it disappears in the next 100-year storm.
 
messy said:
A new poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and The Atlantic has uncovered evidence of deep structural barriers to the ballot for black and Latino voters, specifically in the 2016 election. More than that, the survey finds that the deep wounds of Jim Crow endure, leaving America’s democratic promise unfulfilled.

The real extent of voter suppression in the United States is contested. As was the case for poll taxes and literacy tests long ago, restrictive election laws are often, on their face, racially neutral, giving them a sheen of legitimacy. But the new data from PRRI and The Atlantic suggest that the outcomes of these laws are in no way racially neutral. The poll, conducted in June, surveyed Americans about their experiences with voting, their assessments of the country’s political system, and their interfaces with civics. The results, especially when analyzed by race, are troublesome. They indicate that voter suppression is commonplace, and that voting is routinely harder for people of color than for their white counterparts.

research indicating that frequent changes to polling-site locations hurt minority voters more. Additionally, more than one in 10 blacks and Hispanics missed the registration deadline to vote in 2016, as opposed to just 3 percent of whites. And black and Hispanic respondents were twice as likely as white respondents to have been unable to get time off work for voting.

There are informal roadblocks as well. Under the specter of alleged voter fraud by noncitizens—which was based more on anti-immigrant sentiment than any data or other evidence—and amid increasingly incendiary rhetoric about Latinos, Hispanic voters found 2016 especially difficult. “Roughly one in 10 Hispanics said that the last time they or someone in their household tried to vote, they were bothered at the polls,” Dan Cox, the research director at PRRI, told me. “If you think about the idea of a stolen election, it fits easily into this broader narrative of cultural threat, where perceived outsiders are taking something away from people who were already there.”

These results add credence to what many critics of restrictive voting laws have long suspected. First, voter-ID laws and other, similar statutes aren’t passed in a vacuum, but rather in a country where people of color are significantly less likely to be able to meet the new requirements. Whether intended to discriminate or not, these laws discriminate in effect, and while there is no evidence that they’ve averted any kind of fraud, there is plenty of data detailing just how they’ve created Republican advantages. In that way, Trump’s chances in 2016 may have turned not only on the approval or disapproval of white voters, but also on how effectively state laws, access issues, and social penalties conspired to keep black and Hispanic voters away from polling places.
Click to expand...
Tear.
 
“Nominate me,” says Mayor Pete, and I will stand next to Trump and ask, “Mr. President, I served. Why did you pretend to be disabled so you could avoid your duty?”
 
messy said:
Classy place, that Oceanside “boardwalk!”
Hard to tell who was more obnoxious, the kids or the narc with the camera.
Ricky, you gotta move.
Click to expand...

I stumbled onto Ron Hinton's youtube videos years ago. He attracted me to go the Pier in the first place, after watching some of his videos where he campaigns to keep Oceanside clean by catching people not doing anything. I think the backstory is that he is a Marine retired on disability whose garage door got tagged, and after the neighbor kids laughed at him he had a MISSION!

Another taste --
 
messy said:
Classy place, that Oceanside “boardwalk!”
Hard to tell who was more obnoxious, the kids or the narc with the camera.
Ricky, you gotta move.
Click to expand...
I love Oceanside.
Those vids are old.

Its on the upswing.
Unlike west LA and San Franshithole which are on the decline.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I love Oceanside.
Those vids are old.

Its on the upswing.
Unlike west LA and San Franshithole which are on the decline.
Click to expand...
There ya go, then. I think Oceanside is what it is and it ain’t no more. But nice hotels; flip a coin among the best western, days inn and holiday inn. LOL.
I’m just messy-ing around. I’m sure Oceanside is a cool place to be a local. Good ol’ fashioned beach town...has its charms.
Decline? You looked at housing and rental prices and occupancy in West LA or SF? We all should be in such decline.
 
I used to like the beach there when there was sand that ran all the way down to Carlsbad. Now the South Strand is held up by rock seawalls starting a few hundred yards south of the pier.
 
I guess it's obvious what t's latest orders from putin were . . . the dismantling of America continues as those at t rallies cheer it on the Moscow bitch.
 
messy said:
There ya go, then. I think Oceanside is what it is and it ain’t no more. But nice hotels; flip a coin among the best western, days inn and holiday inn. LOL.
I’m just messy-ing around. I’m sure Oceanside is a cool place to be a local. Good ol’ fashioned beach town...has its charms.
Decline? You looked at housing and rental prices and occupancy in West LA or SF? We all should be in such decline.
Click to expand...
It's no wonder you can't see anything, what with looking down that fucking nose of yours.

Look like occupancy is full in downtown LA
800.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top