Bruddah IZ
DA
And?
Donald J Trump Enemy of the People
- Thread starter Hüsker Dü
- Start date
Hüsker Dü
DA
Why do you conti,he to support a man who won through voter suppression with the help of Putin? 77,000 votes over three states that had voter turn out nunberswell well below 2008 and 2012. Putin got what he wanted and America got the rise of white nationalist terror groups. Enjoy.
DEMOCRATS = WHITE NATIONALIST TERROR GROUPS
Rodent belongs to both groups above....Imagine that...!
Baltimore is a shit hole, and Im not from LA, San Francisco, Fontana or San Bernadino.
(the most obvious California shitholes that come to mind)
Actually, Oceanside is the shithole. Rivals Oxnard but at least Oxnard started to upgrade over by the beaches.
BULLSHIT...you ignorant fucking parrot.
Voter supression? Where exactly did that happen?
July 25, 2019
WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee concluded Thursday that election systems in all 50 states were targeted by Russia in 2016, an effort more far-reaching than previously acknowledged and one largely undetected by the states and federal officials at the time.
The report — the first volume of several to be released from the committee’s investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference — came 24 hours after the former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III warned that Russia was moving again to interfere “as we sit here.”
While details of many of the hackings directed by Russian intelligence, particularly in Illinois and Arizona, are well known, the committee described “an unprecedented level of activity against state election infrastructure” intended largely to search for vulnerabilities in the security of the election systems.
It concluded that while there was no evidence that any votes were changed in actual voting machines, “Russian cyberactors were in a position to delete or change voter data” in the Illinois voter database. The committee found no evidence that they did so.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/us/politics/russian-hacking-elections.html
Tons of voter suppression, you idiot.
Interesting.
Try shitting on the street in Oceanside and see what happens.
More like try to avoid the shit in the street in Oceanside.
Shithole?
Its not San Francisco or LA.
People use toilets here.
Sacramenthole and San Franshithole.
The shit comes from San Franshithole
and plops down in Sacramenthole aka ( The Home of the Northern Mexican Cartel )...
KGB out in front of polling places? Pffftttt...
Where did tons of voter suppression happen, ya arrogant dickwad?
Take your time, hell get on the tele with Daffy, he can repeat what you said.
A new poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and The Atlantic has uncovered evidence of deep structural barriers to the ballot for black and Latino voters, specifically in the 2016 election. More than that, the survey finds that the deep wounds of Jim Crow endure, leaving America’s democratic promise unfulfilled.
The real extent of voter suppression in the United States is contested. As was the case for poll taxes and literacy tests long ago, restrictive election laws are often, on their face, racially neutral, giving them a sheen of legitimacy. But the new data from PRRI and The Atlantic suggest that the outcomes of these laws are in no way racially neutral. The poll, conducted in June, surveyed Americans about their experiences with voting, their assessments of the country’s political system, and their interfaces with civics. The results, especially when analyzed by race, are troublesome. They indicate that voter suppression is commonplace, and that voting is routinely harder for people of color than for their white counterparts.
research indicating that frequent changes to polling-site locations hurt minority voters more. Additionally, more than one in 10 blacks and Hispanics missed the registration deadline to vote in 2016, as opposed to just 3 percent of whites. And black and Hispanic respondents were twice as likely as white respondents to have been unable to get time off work for voting.
There are informal roadblocks as well. Under the specter of alleged voter fraud by noncitizens—which was based more on anti-immigrant sentiment than any data or other evidence—and amid increasingly incendiary rhetoric about Latinos, Hispanic voters found 2016 especially difficult. “Roughly one in 10 Hispanics said that the last time they or someone in their household tried to vote, they were bothered at the polls,” Dan Cox, the research director at PRRI, told me. “If you think about the idea of a stolen election, it fits easily into this broader narrative of cultural threat, where perceived outsiders are taking something away from people who were already there.”
These results add credence to what many critics of restrictive voting laws have long suspected. First, voter-ID laws and other, similar statutes aren’t passed in a vacuum, but rather in a country where people of color are significantly less likely to be able to meet the new requirements. Whether intended to discriminate or not, these laws discriminate in effect, and while there is no evidence that they’ve averted any kind of fraud, there is plenty of data detailing just how they’ve created Republican advantages. In that way, Trump’s chances in 2016 may have turned not only on the approval or disapproval of white voters, but also on how effectively state laws, access issues, and social penalties conspired to keep black and Hispanic voters away from polling places.
I see. So you're there as a business decision.
I'm in LA; people use lawyers here.