I think this is a very interesting topic, even though it only touches tangentially to soccer. When comparing the two lists, the obvious difference is the Forbes includes the smaller liberal arts schools and the service academies, so most schools drop a bit from US News to Forbes. But here are the biggest drops:Or - why I don't like US News ranking...Part I It is less about like and more - what list applies most to a player and parents.
Full disclosure, both my kid's schools look better on Forbes list. But I wanted to know why. Of course there are other lists, but I'm just looking at these two (although US News is really 4). I'm really more posting about the nuances of the US News ranking that is the most often quoted and used.
So here are the lists:
Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/#tab:rank
US News: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...ges/rankings/national-universities?int=9ff208
Here is the Methodology:
Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/carolin...nking-2016-the-full-methodology/#459b237b59a8
US News: http://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-us-news-calculated-the-rankings
Thought #1 - Four Lists vs One based on two things.
Right off the bat you see US News splits the groups into National Universities and Liberal Arts, Regional Universities and Regional colleges. So a student/parent needs to figure that out which list is important. I don' think (guess) most soccer parents are choosing schools on grad programs or National or Liberal Arts. But, that is how they are divided.
National vs Liberal Arts
"National Universities offer a full range of undergraduate majors, plus master's and doctoral programs, and emphasize faculty research. National Liberal Arts Colleges focus almost exclusively on undergraduate education. They award at least 50 percent of their degrees in the arts and sciences."
US News has four factors (grad vs non-grad AND >50% BS vs <50% BS) but two lists. And it puts some science only (BS degrees only) schools as Liberal Arts schools.
It is combining both the need for BS degrees (STEM) and offering masters/doctoral into being called a National University that is a bit confusing. Schools that only offer BS degrees, like the service academies (West Point, Navy, USAFA) or big SAT scoring and science focused Harvey Mudd or Pomona, to name a few, are Liberal Arts schools.
Forbes just ranks them all together.
As most parents are not so interested in grad work at this time (just a guess), the Forbes ranking of putting all together seems to be a better list. Suffice it to say by putting all in the same list a US News #X could be a Forbes X/2 (or X/4 but the Regional s usually are not of the same rank). For example (just an example) National list US News has Berkeley as #20. You might have heard or think that is a top 20 school, and it may be. But is Berkeley better than #1-#20 National Liberal Arts schools? Put them in one list and that changes rankings. People don't like going from #20 to #30 something. So while folks may like things the way they are both/all 4 US News lists in common speak have inflate rankings quoted - by a whole bunch.
More to discuss:
US News Ranking criteria
Financial resources (10 percent) -
Graduation rate performance (7.5 percent)
Student selectivity (12.5 percent)
Undergraduate academic reputation (22.5 percent)
Retention (22.5 percent)
Alumni giving rate (5 percent)
Faculty resources (20 percent)
Johns Hopkins (from 11 to 66)
Emory (from 21 to 67)
NYU (from 32 to 77)
Washington U (from 17 to 60)
Carnegie Mellon (from 23 to 63)
USC (from 25 to 65)
Cal Tech (from 10 to 39)
These are schools that seem to be dropping out of the elite category, even when factoring in the additions of the liberal arts schools. There weren't that many big gainers, Boston College moved up from 30 to 22, and Tufts moved from 27 to 18, but none really jumped from non-elite to elite. So my question is, why the big drop for some pretty prestigious schools? Especially Johns Hopkins, which by reputation is one of the elite research institutions in the country. Is it really #66? Is Caltech really #39? I was always surprised to see Washington U in the top 20 anyways, so that one didn't surprise me as much.