Climate and Weather

The underlying inevitability of the situation is that water levels have continued to rise, leading many to ponder the impact on ocean levels by global warming. From 1996 to 2015, water levels for Miami Beach for high and low tide rose about 4.2 inches, according to data from the University of Miami.

https://weather.com/news/news/miami-beach-state-florida-sand-shortages
The University of Miami Hurricanes you say? Interesting. The Insurance companies will let us know where Florida is at and, whether (NPI) or not rising seas are manageable.
 
The University of Miami Hurricanes you say? Interesting. The Insurance companies will let us know where Florida is at and, whether (NPI) or not rising seas are manageable.
Yes, yes, the "market" will work it all out, nothing to see here, nothing to worry about, the "market" cures all evils . . . eventually.
 
Yes, yes, the "market" will work it all out, nothing to see here, nothing to worry about, the "market" cures all evils . . . eventually.
On the contrary. The market is not there to cure climate change but rather to put a price on that change. But again, the government is bailing out yet another industry, Tourism:

From your article:

Before Hurricane Matthew struck, a $13.5 million project was underway to replenish Jacksonville area beaches with 650,000 thousand cubic yards of sand over seven miles. Local officials were certain that the same amount of sand was lost from the hurricane and the amount of sand needed for the project will likely double.

The Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University has cataloged erosion and beach nourishment programs through the years and has stood at the forefront of understanding for popular beach destinations such as Miami Beach that are quickly losing sand.
Miami Beach specifically has had only one completed nourishment episode – paid for the by federal government – that supplemented the beach with 350,000 cubic yards of sand in 1987, the program reported.

The single project alone carried a $5 million price tag, or more than $10 million in 2016.

The entire state of Florida is faced with a similar dilemma. With 495 different nourishment projects listed, $1.4 billion has been spent to keep sand on the beaches of Florida.
 
On the contrary. The market is not there to cure climate change but rather to put a price on that change. But again, the government is bailing out yet another industry, Tourism:

From your article:

Before Hurricane Matthew struck, a $13.5 million project was underway to replenish Jacksonville area beaches with 650,000 thousand cubic yards of sand over seven miles. Local officials were certain that the same amount of sand was lost from the hurricane and the amount of sand needed for the project will likely double.

The Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University has cataloged erosion and beach nourishment programs through the years and has stood at the forefront of understanding for popular beach destinations such as Miami Beach that are quickly losing sand.
Miami Beach specifically has had only one completed nourishment episode – paid for the by federal government – that supplemented the beach with 350,000 cubic yards of sand in 1987, the program reported.

The single project alone carried a $5 million price tag, or more than $10 million in 2016.

The entire state of Florida is faced with a similar dilemma. With 495 different nourishment projects listed, $1.4 billion has been spent to keep sand on the beaches of Florida.


Husky poo and Weezy could learn a thing or two by just reading your posts and the intent there in instead of automatically disputing the subject matter.
 
Husky poo and Weezy could learn a thing or two by just reading your posts and the intent there in instead of automatically disputing the subject matter.

Yea, BIZ cut and pastes are an endless rabbit hole, I listen to experts and mock fools like you, I'm good with that.
 
Yea, BIZ cut and pastes are an endless rabbit hole, I listen to experts and mock fools like you, I'm good with that.
I do cut and paste. But what I enjoy most is cutting and pasting from the articles that HD post to make the opposite point of what he assumes I am trying to make. "Ehhh, What's up doc?"
 
I do cut and paste. But what I enjoy most is cutting and pasting from the articles that HD post to make the opposite point of what he assumes I am trying to make. "Ehhh, What's up doc?"

Yea, if that's the case, you haven't done a good job showing it.
 
Yea, BIZ cut and pastes are an endless rabbit hole, I listen to experts and mock fools like you, I'm good with that.


Weezy, if what he " Cut and Pastes " supports his premise then you're the fool for falling down some adjoining rabbit hole that has no bearing on his subject matter.

I doubt very much you have the patience to listen to an expert. Your attention span is most likely equivalent to the time frame from your couch to your refrigerator and back.

You say you " Tease " fools, but I suspect it is you who has been mocked.

Case in point :

Why would you feed alcohol to an animal, or endorse it as you have with your avatar. Only a weak minded individual would bring potential harm to an animal.
 

Case in point :

Why would you feed alcohol to an animal, or endorse it as you have with your avatar. Only a weak minded individual would bring potential harm to an animal.
It's a marinade, marinade from the inside . . . it softens the meat . . . do you know anything beyond info wars?
 
Why would you feed alcohol to an animal, or endorse it as you have with your avatar. Only a weak minded individual would bring potential harm to an animal.

Oddly enough, the chicken requested it after reading a few of your posts...
 
Back
Top