Hüsker Dü
DA
"The tides comes in and the tide goes out, you can't explain THAT!"Don't leave us hanging. Where?
"The tides comes in and the tide goes out, you can't explain THAT!"Don't leave us hanging. Where?
Shitstain, if you could finish that Associates Degree at Trump University you might be considered for their Platinum level classes for only $30K a year.
Don't leave us hanging. Where?
The one thing I donʻt ignore is the lack of details regarding erosion and the magnitudes of. People like Buffet and Trump Insure others or their interest against the unknown while you ignorantly opine about the unknown as if it is known. Both hope that the policy will expire without a claim albeit one more than the other.Didn't read much of the article eh?
The application, which was filed on May 10 and available online, states that there are a number of environmental reasons to allow the wall; to protect the "very serious loss of habitat" that has been caused by the "retreat of the coastline."
"The majority of the Irish dune system and virtually all west of Ireland systems are retreating (due to sea level rise and increased Atlantic storminess)," a report connected to the application states. "The evidence for increased storm activity associated with climate change suggests that erosion will accelerate," it said, estimating that if the current rate of erosion is allowed continue "it will result in a significant loss of habitat, and infrastructure."
. . . but of course you living a purely partisan existence void of reasoning you will ignore that as well.
If it was clear he wouldnʻt be Insuring it genius.One thing was definitely clear and that's Buffet/Berkshire's awareness of climate change. That issue is resolved all over the world.
Leave this up to the actuaries. Lol!Makes sense. Insurance isn't worried about its exposure to climate-change-related claims because those would be largely excluded from coverage.
The tides dont play a major role in sand production or distribution."The tides comes in and the tide goes out, you can't explain THAT!"
Their ass. Theyʻve been told to pack it so much.I wonder if they know where sand comes from?
Oh he's insuring climate change? Remind me where he says that? I wonder how that works. But good point!If it was clear he wouldnʻt be Insuring it genius.
At the shareholders meetings. The particular one I quoted was from 2015 that Espola read.Oh he's insuring climate change? Remind me where he says that? I wonder how that works. But good point!
It works by taking in more premiums than claims paid.Oh he's insuring climate change? Remind me where he says that? I wonder how that works. But good point!
I read that, too. Berkshire acknowledges the significant loss of natural habitat and infrastructure that will ensue from climate change. Tough to understand when your head is filled with your own noise. You're the guy who thinks Russia is communist.
One thing was definitely clear and that's Buffet/Berkshire's awareness of climate change.
No, not now and not evah.Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
No, not now and not evah.
Lets just follow the money and that will bear fruit.
You think I'm going to debate with scientific consensus? Can I tell you the Earth revolves around the sun because of my research? No. As Joe points out, follow the money. The reason there is an anti-science side to the debate is because we are a fossil-fuel based economy and the oil companies' money has created a fake "debate."Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
Yes, the science side has no need or want for money.You think I'm going to debate with scientific consensus? Can I tell you the Earth revolves around the sun because of my research? No. As Joe points out, follow the money. The reason there is an anti-science side to the debate is because we are a fossil-fuel based economy and the oil companies' money has created a fake "debate."
Yes, the science side has no need or want for money.
There will always be research, folks. When it reveals issues (such as the NFL concussion research and climate change and tobacco) that threaten massive corporate profits, there are no limits to the lengths that those threatened will go to via media campaigns, character assassination, falsifying its own research, etc., to protect their position. For some reason, the right now believes, as I have stated, that the scientific research side as the power. Somehow we find conservative politics telling us that while telling us that the white hetero male is the oppressed, labor (in an economy where wages are stagnant) wields too much power over management, etc. SMH.Science needs funding like anything else, difference is, it doesn't rely on a false narrative to further it's profits.