Wasn't it Davis who gave state workers (prison guards?) HUGE pensions that we can't pay for?The other guy before the puss-enator was just as bad, but he got nixed before he could do a Jerry Brown.
Wasn't it Davis who gave state workers (prison guards?) HUGE pensions that we can't pay for?The other guy before the puss-enator was just as bad, but he got nixed before he could do a Jerry Brown.
Things have definitely changed, they take out 10% of my boy's pay to put toward his pension, not sure how much he will make after retirement and how it all pencils out, but I know it won't be 90%.The pension gap
It was a deal that wasn’t supposed to cost taxpayers an extra dime. Now the state’s annual tab is in the billions, and the cost keeps climbing.
By JACK DOLAN SEPT. 18, 2016
With the stroke of a pen, California Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation that gave prison guards, park rangers, Cal State professors and other state employees the kind of retirement security normally reserved for the wealthy.
More than 200,000 civil servants became eligible to retire at 55 — and in many cases collect more than half their highest salary for life. California Highway Patrol officers could retire at 50 and receive as much as 90% of their peak pay for as long as they lived.
Proponents sold the measure in 1999 with the promise that it would impose no new costs on California taxpayers. The state employees’ pension fund, they said, would grow fast enough to pay the bill in full.
They were off — by billions of dollars — and taxpayers will bear the consequences for decades to come.
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-pension-crisis-davis-deal/
Has this been addressed and corrected by the folks in Sacramento?
The other guy before the puss-enator was just as bad, but he got nixed before he could do a Jerry Brown.
Things have definitely changed, they take out 10% of my boy's pay to put toward his pension, not sure how much he will make after retirement and how it all pencils out, but I know it won't be 90%.
Things have definitely changed, they take out 10% of my boy's pay to put toward his pension, not sure how much he will make after retirement and how it all pencils out, but I know it won't be 90%.
They all take turns being Fire Chief and their pension is based off their highest paying year. Nice cushy set-up if you can get . . . tell your son congrats, if he stays healthy and flies right, once retired he will be sucking up tax payer dollars for decades! Good for him!Things have definitely changed, they take out 10% of my boy's pay to put toward his pension, not sure how much he will make after retirement and how it all pencils out, but I know it won't be 90%.
They all take turns being Fire Chief and their pension is based off their highest paying year. Nice cushy set-up if you can get . . . tell your son congrats, if he stays healthy and flies right, once retired he will be sucking up tax payer dollars for decades! Good for him!
PrivatizeThey all take turns being Fire Chief and their pension is based off their highest paying year. Nice cushy set-up if you can get . . . tell your son congrats, if he stays healthy and flies right, once retired he will be sucking up tax payer dollars for decades! Good for him!
So, you don't believe moon beam and his 9 billion $ surplus projection? He has never been wrong before.The pension gap
It was a deal that wasn’t supposed to cost taxpayers an extra dime. Now the state’s annual tab is in the billions, and the cost keeps climbing.
By JACK DOLAN SEPT. 18, 2016
With the stroke of a pen, California Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation that gave prison guards, park rangers, Cal State professors and other state employees the kind of retirement security normally reserved for the wealthy.
More than 200,000 civil servants became eligible to retire at 55 — and in many cases collect more than half their highest salary for life. California Highway Patrol officers could retire at 50 and receive as much as 90% of their peak pay for as long as they lived.
Proponents sold the measure in 1999 with the promise that it would impose no new costs on California taxpayers. The state employees’ pension fund, they said, would grow fast enough to pay the bill in full.
They were off — by billions of dollars — and taxpayers will bear the consequences for decades to come.
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-pension-crisis-davis-deal/
Has this been addressed and corrected by the folks in Sacramento?
He told me to tell you Thank you.They all take turns being Fire Chief and their pension is based off their highest paying year. Nice cushy set-up if you can get . . . tell your son congrats, if he stays healthy and flies right, once retired he will be sucking up tax payer dollars for decades! Good for him!
Capitalist.Privatize
So like back in the day if you haven't paid your mordida they let it burn? Would they fight forest fires or let them burn until they get close to a clients property?Privatize
So like back in the day if you haven't paid your mordida they let it burn? Would they fight forest fires or let them burn until they get close to a clients property?
No and Yes.So like back in the day if you haven't paid your mordida they let it burn? Would they fight forest fires or let them burn until they get close to a clients property?
Ignorance rears it's ugly head once again....They all take turns being Fire Chief and their pension is based off their highest paying year. Nice cushy set-up if you can get . . . tell your son congrats, if he stays healthy and flies right, once retired he will be sucking up tax payer dollars for decades! Good for him!
Yes, and Jerry Brown started the ball rolling with state employee unions way back in his first go 'round as guv.Wasn't it Davis who gave state workers (prison guards?) HUGE pensions that we can't pay for?