Perhaps other people disagree with you about whether zero covid is possible?
After all, you begin by assuming that 1/3 to 2/3 of us refuse to wear masks, get vaccinated, or move social events outside. Under those assumptions, covid spreads widely. But that is not the only possible choice we have for our behavior.
A high vax rate and moderate mask/distance/outside norms are enough to drive hospitalizations near zero. Vermont is averaging one hospitalized covid patient right now. SF is around 25. Both have fewer than one covid death per day.
Now, if you want to open schools, burn your masks, and ban vaccine requirements, then you’re in Louisiana/Arkansas/Missouri territory, with around 1000 hospitalizations and 10 deaths per day.
But that is our choice. We don’t have to pick the stupid option.
Wow, I always thought you were one of the more level headed pro lockdowners. You actually believe zero COVID is possible in the foreseeable future??? You also were relatively thinking that this shouldn't be put on the children but now in the parade of horribles you list "open schools". You would really deprive children of another year of education and another year of their childhood? And when is the offramp for you: we were waiting for 14 days to slow the spread, then a month, then until the hospitals were ready, then until treatments were available, then until the elderly vaxxed, then until everyone offered a vax....what are we waiting for now?
I gotta say you were one of the more level headed blue pillers here. If you are representative of where the level headed ones are at, we are in for big problems here in around 6 weeks.