There’s an anti Pfizer whisper campaign afoot in Europe. It’s based on the claims that the mRNA vaccines cause myocarditis. Some are blaming the Russian government which is trying to push its Sputnik vaccines. Others say it’s az which had a study leaked showing incidents of deaths (not necessarily correlated) were greater with the Pfizer vaccine than with the az vaccine.
Bad News Thread
- Thread starter kickingandscreaming
- Start date
If we agree that a people per square foot standard survives, then we can stop with the “all restrictions are illegal” line of reasoning.
At most, we can say that Newsom wrote his restrictions the wrong way. He should have just said 5 people per 1000 square feet, plus 6 feet distance and a minimum air cycling standard.
Good vs Evil: The Two Doors of Life
Door #1 is Jesus Christ The Winner. Freedom, forgiveness, mercy, grace, love, joy, peace & happiness, no more disease, no more fear, no more hate and just a fun guy to be around.
Door #2 is Lucifer The Loser. Slave, hate, division, murder, abortion, harvest baby parts, torture baby and then drink blood from Pineal Gland and eat that too for the ultimate high on earth. Have the world and everything the world brings: Sex, drugs and rock and roll. Cheating and more cheating so one can look good all the time, abuse kids in foster care, steal kids for human trafficking, drink more blood to get high, sell soul, rape, lie and more lies. Live a life of a Big Lie. Lie and more lie and just die. That is not a good life and brings heart ache to one's soul.
I hear it's going to get really scary soon. It's going to get dark. Lean on Him and He will take good care of you. Love you all, regardless of what door you choose. I know someone who is atheist and he just told me that he believes in UFOs now. I told him those are Angels bro and he got all mad at me. I love my pal
That would have survived if he applied it equally across all establishments and not singled out churches. But schools would still be shut, no?
The other thing which might have survived at the time and could have peeled off some cons is very narrowly defining essential as necessary for survival. But that would have meant schools must close, dentists limited to emergency care, no weed or alcohol shops open, no takeout....only grocery fire police medical and pharmacies and the blm stuff would have complicated things
...or that it didn’t matter how the restrictions were written because by the time they were challenged though the court system the surge or peak would have passed.
A. But the precedent has now been set of it needs to be used again and
B. It most definitely impacted the way newsom was able to manage the winter surge and it also forced him into settlements with religious schools in some areas keeping them open.
If there is a pandemic in the future, there will be a much quicker rush to the courts than what happened this time, because of the beating the restrictions took in the court.
Are we seriously arguing about the volume of air in Costcos and churches? Whatever standard of occupancy is set is speculative at best and largely irrelevant. It seems we're completely missing the bigger picture. The virus doesn't give a shit about micromanagement. Staying 6 feet away from non-household members is probably the best we can do.
For the next pandemic are we going to get epidemiologist decoder rings, so we know which ones to believe vs. the ones to ignore?
For the next pandemic are we going to get epidemiologist decoder rings, so we know which ones to believe vs. the ones to ignore?
Bruddah IZ
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Doesn't Costco have more daily Masses than a Church? Can I get an Amen??
Desert Hound
DA
The virus was going to spread no matter what. The reality is people had to go to the store, get gas, etc. A significant amount of people had to work, etc. When you look at that, the virus was going to spread.
At best maybe people learn to stay home when they don't feel well.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Always good for a laugh.
C+C+P+Dr. F+Abortion+HC+Vax+Vax Booster x pie+Billy Boy x Tommy Boy= WMD+Evil= Satan or some like to call Lucifer!!! He's captured folks. Think about that for a moment. My sources and rumor mill is backing me up 100%. Clean up time has been going on. Arrest too so sit back and watch with your eyes. God really does love us all. Jesus came to save, not judge you. He knows way more then Santa and the NSA combined. He knows motive as well. Bad people can become good, trust me. Bad people WHO become evil is not good. Look, if you got caught with kick back and hand in cookie jar, stop doing that and be good from now on. It's a choice If you get confronted and you know you cheated, stop cheating and say sorry. Dont get all defensive and act like you did nothing wrong.
If you get confronted and you know you cheated, stop cheating and say sorry. Dont get all defensive and act like you did nothing wrong.Amen Bruddah!!!
Desert Hound
DA
Yep.
And over the past couple of months his story on the lab in China has changed. Last year he was telling us this was a naturally occurring virus. The press happily went along and was not curious as to the origin of the virus be it natural or man made.
Now that it doesn't matter any more, suddenly it isn't some conspiracy story any more. Hell the Wash Post just the other day basically said their reporting early on was partisan. Since Trump said it may have came from a lab, the Post and others took the other position.
We would be far better off if people realized that the press is highly partisan in this country. Most support one party. Most in their reporting help to create divisions in this country that would normally not be there.
Hey Hound, we've all been lied too. Natural virus my ass bro. This is game on!!!
[QUOTE="Desert Hound, post: 395372, member: 175"
At best maybe people learn to stay home when they don't feel well.
[/QUOTE]
This 100%. Unfortunately, in many respects the policies for the healthy and the sick were effectively the same. This lack of differentiation I believe caused more problems than it solved.
At best maybe people learn to stay home when they don't feel well.
[/QUOTE]
This 100%. Unfortunately, in many respects the policies for the healthy and the sick were effectively the same. This lack of differentiation I believe caused more problems than it solved.
Desert Hound
DA
This 100%. Unfortunately, in many respects the policies for the healthy and the sick were effectively the same. This lack of differentiation I believe caused more problems than it solved.
[/QUOTE]
It was a blanket approach that as you said treated various groups the same despite the fact that the vast majority of the population has little to no risk from covid.
Life expectancy in the US is 78. The average age of people dying due to covid is also 78
Desert Hound
DA
And from the latest study that came out this week regarding masks...
By the way you notice there are studies coming out showing a lack of effectiveness over the course of the pandemic? And you notice that the major governmental agencies have also posted they still need further studies to determine if masks actually work? If it were such a slam dunk that masks worked, there would be an abundance of studies showing just that. And yet there are not. Politically these various orgs here and abroad have to keep recommending masks.
"New findings reported Tuesday in a University of Louisville study challenge what has been the prevailing belief that mask mandates are necessary to slow the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus. The study notes that "80% of US states mandated masks during the COVID-19 pandemic" and while "mandates induced greater mask compliance, [they] did not predict lower growth rates when community spread was low (minima) or high (maxima)." Among other things, the study--conducted using data from the CDC covering multiple seasons--reports that "mask mandates and use are not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread among US states."
"Our findings do not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates decrease with greater public mask use," notes the U of L report. Researchers stated that "masks may promote social cohesion as rallying symbols during a pandemic, but risk compensation can also occur"...
By the way you notice there are studies coming out showing a lack of effectiveness over the course of the pandemic? And you notice that the major governmental agencies have also posted they still need further studies to determine if masks actually work? If it were such a slam dunk that masks worked, there would be an abundance of studies showing just that. And yet there are not. Politically these various orgs here and abroad have to keep recommending masks.
"New findings reported Tuesday in a University of Louisville study challenge what has been the prevailing belief that mask mandates are necessary to slow the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus. The study notes that "80% of US states mandated masks during the COVID-19 pandemic" and while "mandates induced greater mask compliance, [they] did not predict lower growth rates when community spread was low (minima) or high (maxima)." Among other things, the study--conducted using data from the CDC covering multiple seasons--reports that "mask mandates and use are not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread among US states."
"Our findings do not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates decrease with greater public mask use," notes the U of L report. Researchers stated that "masks may promote social cohesion as rallying symbols during a pandemic, but risk compensation can also occur"...