Somewhat on point I'd say. I have an almost eiditic memory but it's beginning to fail over the years, and I have found myself struggling harder through the number sheets recently. In any case, you are right I couldn't produce the underlying math, but I'm competent enough to read the MBAs' analysis of it and make projections based on it. Though you caught me, it's not my favorite thing to do and I groan when I have to see it.
I undersand what "not statistically significant means". You are making the opposite fallacy though and assuming that because there is a difference, it means its significant. That's not how anyone interpreted the study, and I even showed you an exposition (from an MD no less) showing you why you are wrong. I also showed you in the same interpetation why that's a very bad place to even start the inquiry. Because the study started with instructions given to people on how to wear the mask. Because the study handed out surgical masks and the instruction was to replace often. And because the study didn't take into account the cloth masks and bandanas that people wear. The acutal real world circumstance are WORSE than the study, so if you are starting from not statistically significant it's bad. That's why all you blue pillers are so anxious to dunk on the study, and everyone outside your bubble knows it. And that's from a middle of the road, fair critique that I cited...I could cite others but you'd dismiss them as partisan sources.
But that's the problem with you. You are clinging for dear life so terrified to that blue pill that you engage in goalpost moving, straw men, mischaracterizing others statements, and even cry ad hominem when you yourself start engaging in it (and started it). You are so terrified of losing your blue pill and the illusion of control that you'll do anything and everything to alter the reality around you and preserve your illusion. It's sad.