While I don't have any experience with United myself, we do know a lot of players who have played in the program over the years (I believe our area may have been one of the first to start it) and it seems like a good option for the lower level player. If your kid is only good enough to play on the C or D team on a big club why not do United and pay way less in fees? Especially kids who don't want to step down to rec, but want a bit more flexibility than a lot of clubs give.
Looking at the rosters of the age groups we know, I'm seeing players who we've known or played with in club. Most of those were benchwarmers on the "A-team" or maybe starters on their B or C team.
That being said, my only issue with United is that coaches are almost always parents and all the possible problems that come with that.
Looking at the rosters of the age groups we know, I'm seeing players who we've known or played with in club. Most of those were benchwarmers on the "A-team" or maybe starters on their B or C team.
That being said, my only issue with United is that coaches are almost always parents and all the possible problems that come with that.