Exactly.Hmm... Live fee or die... usually doesn't follow a sentence that starts with "if it was up to me we would still be allowed"
Exactly.Hmm... Live fee or die... usually doesn't follow a sentence that starts with "if it was up to me we would still be allowed"
Listen shithead,
If it was up to me we would still be allowed to ride in the back of a pickup truck and ride a bike without a helmet.
Live free or die.
I ride a bike without a helmet all the timeI have done both of those in the last year.
I ride a bike without a helmet all the time
Help!You are, obviously, a deeply disturbed individual that cries out for help constantly. It must give you some comfort to come in here and vent with others much like you, the victims, the aggrieved, the emotionally stunted.
I agree. I've never said otherwise.We should look to eliminate all the causes of unnatural deaths shouldn't we? Even the the "1% to 2%".
Daffy doing that projecting thing....You are, obviously, a deeply disturbed individual that cries out for help constantly. It must give you some comfort to come in here and vent with others much like you, the victims, the aggrieved, the emotionally stunted.
I agree. I've never said otherwise.
But for some, running around screaming the sky is falling when it's not, is pathetic.
Pointing your fingers at 1% - 2% of gun deaths while ignoring the vast majority of those deaths is daffy.
The crisis is in the inner cities, it's been going on for decades. Yet the Daffy Ducks on the left and in the media ignore it and scream assault rifles...
Back ground checks are fine but society needs to take a long hard look at where we are.
People have become more isolated, more depressed and less forgiving.
Better parenting, additional mental health availability and maybe more moral and religious teachings all things that have fallen by the wayside for to many folks.
Have a great day Duck.
I ride a bike without a helmet all the time
Including "assault rifles" .... you tell me Magoo.How many straw men is that?
Including "assault rifles" .... you tell me Magoo.
We've always had semi automatic rifles & pistols in my life time....we've never had mass shootings and killings or the contempt for life we have now.
If those are "straw men" to you, look in the mirror and you'll see a straw man staring back at you...
You must be old and have lost your mind.You must be young, or have selective memory. Semi-automatic weapons known as "assault weapons" were banned by Federal law from 1994 to 2004, but many similar weapons were not banned even then due to quirks in how "assault weapons" were defined in the law, and subsequent redesign actions by gun manufacturers to evade the law made the whole thing moot. Political action by the NRA (heavily influenced by the manufacturers and dealers - have you noticed?) has so far defeated any attempt to extend or renew the ban.
I will withdraw my statement about your straw men if you will describe what exactly it is that you are arguing against.
You must be old and have lost your mind.
I'm talking about the 60's, 70's, 80's before the so called assault weapons ban.
California has an assault weapons ban. Has since about 1989. It's also against the law to murder people & assault folks.
Pass all the laws and ban certain weapons, but until society addresses why folks would want to kill innocent people, innocent folks will continue to be killed.
I'm not arguing for or against anything, you are. I'm simply pointing out facts. Pass more laws and ignore where we are as a nation, nothing will change.
Pass another law...How do you suggest that society address that?
Pass another law...
You never come off as very creative or able to provide answers to the actual questions you are asked.Pass another law...
Pass another law...
Are you suggesting there were no laws against making terrorist threats?
Are you suggesting there were no laws against making terrorist threats?
You implied the law was a new one.The video makes it clear that there are.