An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

espola said:
So, nothing then?

I unrescind my statement about your straw men.
Click to expand...
That seems to be your answer, just pass more laws.
What would you do Magoo?
Obviously you'd pass more laws...
Confiscate weapons?
What else?
Take your time
 
Last edited:
Hüsker Dü said:
You never come off as very creative or able to provide answers to the actual questions you are asked.
Click to expand...
I'm asking the question to promote thought, in this case deeper than simply passing another law.
More laws won't change what is wrong with many folks in our country.
The fact that you don't get it is a surprise to no one.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I'm asking the question to promote thought, in this case deeper than simply passing another law.
More laws won't change what is wrong with many folks in our country.
The fact that you don't get it is a surprise to no one.
Click to expand...
And again you make something up to be against.
 
Lion Eyes said:
And again you lack the ability to comprehend the conversation or you're simply projecting...

Exactly what did I "make up to be against"?
Click to expand...
Hunker Dunker is just a dingaling.
You hit the nail on the head.
We dont need more laws.
If someone goes online and says he is gonna shoot people, we should believe him and send in the white coats.
We already have laws against making terrorist threats.
Its not rocket science.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Hunker Dunker is just a dingaling.
You hit the nail on the head.
We dont need more laws.
If someone goes online and says he is gonna shoot people, we should believe him and send in the white coats.
We already have laws against making terrorist threats.
Its not rocket science.
Click to expand...
Joe recently said he was "gonna kill that bitch" in reference to Kamala Harris what did you do about that?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Joe recently said he was "gonna kill that bitch" in reference to Kamala Harris what did you do about that?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to do anything.
My job is to protect the health of the nation by installing top notch plumbing systems.
I protect my own home.
If someone tries to kill me or my family, they might wake up dead.
If you feel it was a terrorist threat, do what you think you need to do.
I'm sure any threat to an elected official is monitored.





Madaonna said she thought alot about blowing up the White House.
What happened there?
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I'm not going to do anything.
My job is to protect the health of the nation by installing top notch plumbing systems.
I protect my own home.
If someone tries to kill me or my family, they might wake up dead.
If you feel it was a terrorist threat, do what you think you need to do.
I'm sure any threat to an elected official is monitored.





Madaonna said she thought alot about blowing up the White House.
What happened there?
Click to expand...
Coward.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I'm asking the question to promote thought, in this case
deeper than simply passing another law.
More laws won't change what is wrong with many folks
in our country.
The fact that you don't get it is a surprise to no one.
Click to expand...

The " Rodent " is incapable of serious deep thought, that would
be contrary to the Lemming order he abides by....

Regurgitation is much easier on his " Frontal Lobe "..!
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Coward.
Click to expand...


Your comment is to be directed at your own mirror...

95546581-cartoon-framed-old-mirror.jpg
 
Ricky Fandango said:
You implied the law was a new one.
We dont need more laws.
Click to expand...

I implied nothing. I asked the previous poster if this is the type of law to which he was referring. As we have discovered, this law exists already in some form in some areas, but I'm not sure from LE's responses what his position about that law is,

Here is a position for you - we need just enough laws so that everyone can have what they want as long as they don't fail a numbnuts discovery procedure. Not being able to answer a simple question might mark one as a failing that process.
 
espola said:
I implied nothing. I asked the previous poster if this is the type of law to which he was referring. As we have discovered, this law exists already, but I'm not sure from LE's responses what his position is.

Here is a position for you - we need just enough laws so that everyone can have what they want as long as they don't fail a numbnuts discovery procedure. Not being able to answer a simple question might mark one as a failing that process.
Click to expand...
"Like this one" -when asked about new laws.
-espola-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top